Skip to content

· Private foundation

International Impact Ministries In

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$201k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$436kReligion$432kHuman Services$173kPhilanthropy$136kFood & Nutrition$79kEducation$41kHealth$25kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
$3,600
Median grant
7
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$66,080
HOSANNA INSTITUTE OF SAHEL$35,000
ISTORIA MINISTRIES$21,000
NEW HOPEDALE MENNONITE CHURCH$20,000
TOUCH INDIA MINISTRIES$10,000
REACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC$6,000
YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH$6,000
ADOPT TOGETHER$5,000
OKLA BAPTIST DISASTER RELIEF$5,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$3,600
MISSION TO THE WORLD INC$3,600
WORLD TEAM JON CASSEL$3,600
LOAVES AND FISHES OF OKLAHOMA$3,000
JOURNEY WOMEN'S CENTER$3,000
RELIANT MISSIONS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($1.2M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($199k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RISING VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%ADOPT TOGETHER: $5k → 6%HOPE OUT REACH: $500 → 16%HOPE OUT REACH: $500 → 16%HOPE OUT REACH: $250 → 16%YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 16%YWCA ENID: $1k → 16%YWCA ENID: $1k → 16%YWCA ENID: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
AR
TN
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($199k)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
OC$126k · 5 grants
United Kingdom$39k · 3 grants
Indonesia$16k · 3 grants
Poland$10k · 1 grant
Senegal$8k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of International Impact Ministries In’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 70% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 67%.

International Impact Ministries Inlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 37 repeat orgs$323k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
38

Total granted

$1.1M
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+28%

Still filing today

27%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionEducationEmploymentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE SAHEL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $332k · revenue +14%
  • RS
    REACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $47k · revenue +66%
  • IM
    Istoria Ministries Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $31k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • AS
    ASOCIATIA SURSA VETII- LIVIU
    one grant, 2022 · $41k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
2
Kings Commission Ministries

Our mission is to carry out the commands of our Lord Jesus Christ to take the Good News of the gospel to the whole world teaching people to obey everything He commanded. We work among mostly low-literacy populations so we do this by…

—
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
4
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
7
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
8
Rejoice Ministries International

RMI provides pastoral care ministry and support globally, with conferences, seminars, retreats, meetings and individual counseling.

Civil Rights
9
Partners in Development Worldwide

Train ministers, lay people and students who are involved at any level of ministry in small or large churches at local, national, and international levels. We train to go into the world and spread the gospel by helping people meet their…

International
10
Contagious Disciple Making

Helping the hardest to reach people of North America Develop a relationship with Christ

Human Services
11
Reaching Indians Ministries International Inc

mission is to transform the spiritual, social, and economic conditions of the unreached people groups of South Asia with the message of Jesus Christ by developing indigenous leaders.

Religion
12
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sonset Solutions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Minding the Gap Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ZOMI CHARITY FOUNDATION: $126,400 · OtherZOMI CHARITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $66,080 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASOCIATIA SURSA VETII- LIVIU: $40,500 · OtherOBA: $40,000 · OtherSTAN FAMILY MINISTRIES: $36,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $33,715 · Other+59 more: $390,386 · Other+59 moreHOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE SAHEL INC: $332,320 · EmploymentHOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE S…+1 more: $2,500 · EmploymentFJ MINISTRIES: $76,000 · ReligionFJ MINISTRIE…REACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC: $47,000 · ReligionREACHING SOU…Istoria Ministries Inc: $31,000 · ReligionIstoria Mini…+2 more: $360 · ReligionHIS PURPOSE FOUNDATION: $112,340 · Human ServicesHIS PURPOS…HOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human Services+4 more: $8,750 · Human Services+4 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $7,800 · Youth Development4R Kids Foundation: $7,500 · PhilanthropyONE COLLECTIVE: $4,750 · International4D Ministries: $1,000 · International
Other$783,081Employment$334,820Religion$154,360Human Services$126,090Youth Development$7,800Philanthropy$7,500International$5,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE SAHEL INC: $332,320 over 9y, 16% of budgetHIS PURPOSE FOUNDATION: $112,340 over 8y, 18% of budgetFJ MINISTRIES: $76,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetREACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC: $47,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetIstoria Ministries Inc: $31,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $7,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budget4R Kids Foundation: $7,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetONE COLLECTIVE: $4,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $3,059 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEXT LIFE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetRISING VILLAGE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetENID ARTS & SCIENCES FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE OUTREACH INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLEADING EDGE INTERNATIONAL LTD: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSARAH MCLEAN FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget4D Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRYAN COLLEGE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDownline Ministries: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT ASSOCIATIO: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSANNA INSTITUTE OF THE SAHEL INC ↗
  • Who funds HIS PURPOSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FJ MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds REACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Istoria Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds 4R Kids Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Oklahoma Osteopathic FoundationOK13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Oklahoma Osteopathic Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Impact Ministries In funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Impact Ministries In. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Youth and Family Services Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Community Development Support Associatio: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on International Impact Ministries In’s filings →

More from the funding graph