Skip to content
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson at a glance

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson

Joined together as a union to ensure not only that members receive fair compensation for their contributions to the enterprise, but that members also have a strong voice in the workplace, particularly with respect to safety and matters of professional expertise.

$622k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$466k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Philanthropy$544kEmployment$235kEducation$116kInternational$33kCommunity Improvement$31kHuman Services$29kHealth$25kPublic Benefit$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $537,852, the rows itemized in this filing. The $622,289 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $84,437 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $46k
  • $250k+1 grant · $466k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GILLIG LLC$466,402
TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$15,000
SAN FRANCISCO BLDG CNST TRADES COUNCIL$11,400
ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS$10,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL$10,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY BLDG CNST TRADES COUNCIL$7,000
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 986 CHARITY FUND INC$6,500
TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 42$6,000
SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL$5,550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Davis Street Community Center Inc: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$495k · 12 repeat orgs$548k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$495k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+22%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $479k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEducationHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Teamsters All Charities Fund
    7× · 2018–2024 · $111k · revenue +4%
  • TJ
    Teamsters' Joint Council No 7
    2× · 2020–2023 · $58k · revenue +45%
  • DS
    Davis Street Foundation
    3× · 2018–2020 · $31k · revenue +271%

Funded once

  • TL
    TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +22%
  • TD
    The Davis Street Community Center Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +62%
  • WF
    WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
2
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

—
3
Contra Costa Labor Council Afl-Cio

The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…

—
4
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
5
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 330

To organize workers for their moral, economic and social advancement.

—
6
International Brotherhood of 856 Tcwh Freight Checkers Clerical

Labor Union

—
7
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

—
8
American Federation of Labor

To encourage all workers to share equally in the full benefits of union organization and to promulgate the principles ennunciated by the AFL-CIO to encourage workers to promote the principle of free collective bargainin

—
9
Teamsters Local 1932

It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…

—
10
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
11
Washington State Labor Council Afl-Cio

To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.

—
12
Laborers Afl-Cio Local 1035

To organize all workers for the economic, moral, and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund; the most unlike its peers is Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GILLIG LLC: $466,402 · OtherGILLIG LLCTeamsters All Charities Fund: $110,705 · OtherTeamsters All Charities FundAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL: $83,100 · OtherAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCILTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $58,323 · OtherTeamsters' Joint Council No 7+7 more: $108,072 · Other+7 moreINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $60,000 · EducationINTERNATIONA…PEGGY BROWNING FUND: $35,700 · EducationPEGGY BROWNI…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $20,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFF…Davis Street Foundation: $31,250 · Community ImprovementSan Francisco Transit Riders: $7,500 · Community ImprovementTeamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc: $6,500 · Community ImprovementTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $25,000 · HealthThe Davis Street Community Center Inc: $14,650 · Human ServicesWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsTeamsters' Assistance Program: $6,000 · Employment
Other$826,602Education$115,700Community Improvement$45,250Health$25,000Human Services$14,650Civil Rights$10,000Employment$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeamsters All Charities Fund: $110,705 over 7y, 18% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL: $83,100 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $58,323 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $35,700 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetDavis Street Foundation: $31,250 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSan Francisco Labor Council: $23,848 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS 431: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSF BLDG & CONST TRADES COUNCIL: $17,800 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThe Davis Street Community Center Inc: $14,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $14,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Francisco Transit Riders: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTeamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetInternational Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeamsters' Assistance Program: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Federation of Labor & CIO Monterey Bay Central Labor Council: $5,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…Sanitary Truck Driver…International Brother…Teamsters Local 1932Amazonsmile Foundation
International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers ClericalCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · Teamsters Local 1932 · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home