How much did TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 grant in FY2024?

Education$105kReligion$69kEmployment$45kYouth Development$27kHealth$21kPhilanthropy$20kCivil Rights$18kHousing & Shelter$16kHuman Services$13kOther$126k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

childrentraining educationskills

2020

—

2023

teamsterfinancialclasstriple negativenegative breastbreast cancerunion

2024

teamsterclassfinancialtriple negativenegative breastbreast cancerworking

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2 grants · $14k
$10k–50k6 grants · $63k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$12,250
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 63 CHARITY$10,515
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 CHARITY$10,000
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 848 ALL CHARITIES FUND$10,000
JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC$8,000
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF 42 JOINT COUNCIL$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$357k · 12 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$357k

$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%

+6%

Still filing today

92%

78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationEmploymentYouth DevelopmentReligionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

YH
Youth Helpers
4× · 2019–2023 · $69k · revenue +88%
TJ
Teamsters Joint Council 42
5× · 2018–2024 · $54k · revenue +17%
JR
James R Hoffa Memorial Schol
4× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +29%

Funded once

TL
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 TRAINING CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +17845%
LT
LA Trade Tech College
one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue -81%
WW
We Will Foundation
one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Southern California & Southern

To provide donations to other charities in communities where Teamster families reside and scholarships to family members of Teamsters.

Philanthropy

Teamsters Local 1205 Timothy Lynch

Teamsters local 1205 timothy lynch memorial scholarship fund exists for the purpose of making college education more easily accessible to the children and dependents of international brotherhood of teamsters local 1205 by providing…

Education

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

To improve and promote the welfare and working conditions of its membership.

—

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—

Teamsters' Joint Council No 7

To promote better working conditions for members.

—

International Bro of Teamsters Local 991

Perform labor union duties and services

—

California Trucking Association

To promote the common interests of those engaged in california's trucking industry.

—

General Teamstersprofessional &

To provide support for members through labor negotiations, collective bargaining agreements and by working to eliminate unfair labor practices.

—

International Brotherhood of

Labor Union

—

Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 252

The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…

—

Teamsters Local 1932

The negotiation and maintenance of labor contracts for members.

—

California State Council of Service

Coordinate affiliated local unions to better the working conditions of its members.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of and the most unlike its peers is Teamsters Local 1932 Training Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 21% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/26

the rest of the field

13%

10,371/78,141

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/23

Grantees still filing

17/23

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$172,155Education$105,000Religion$68,835Employment$45,125Youth Development$27,181Health$21,325Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Brotherhood of 063 TCWHCA18.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · City Employees Union Local 237 Ibt Afl-C · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 CHARITY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 811520679 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 CHARITY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Teamsters Local 1932?

Find your warmest path to Teamsters Local 1932 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Teamsters Local 1932?

More from the funding graph

TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

23 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Teamsters Local 1932?

More from the funding graph