Skip to content
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$107kEmployment$91kPhilanthropy$57kCivil Rights$23kYouth Development$21kInternational$14kMembership Benefit$8kHealth$7k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $63,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $75,450 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,450 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL CHARITIES AND SCHOLARSHIP FUND$20,000
Teamsters Scholarship Fund$20,000
ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS$10,000
Teamster National Black Caucus$6,500
LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Central Coast Labor Council: $8k → 10%ALL CHARITIES AND SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $20k → 10%JOINT COUNCIL 7: $44k → 10%Joint Council 42 Charity: $6k → 14%Teamsters Scholarship Fund: $35k → 14%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $16k → 10%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $10k → 10%LAANE: $14k → 14%James R Hoffa Memorial Scholarship Fund: $22k → 14%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $9k → 10%LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $7k → 14%Teamsters Scholarship Fund: $20k → 14%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $8k → 10%LAANE: $6k → 14%JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10k → 14%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $8k → 10%UNITED STUDENTS AGAINS SWEATSHOPS: $14k → 14%SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 54%.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$221k · 7 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$221k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Teamsters All Charities Fund
    5× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +137%
  • JR
    JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $32k · revenue +107%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY
    3× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • TJ
    Teamsters' Joint Council No 7graduated
    one grant, 2020 · $44k · revenue +45%
  • Alliance for Global Justice Corp
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +3%
  • SF
    San Francisco Labor Councilgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
2
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
3
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 330

To organize workers for their moral, economic and social advancement.

—
4
Teamsters Local 1932

It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…

—
5
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffers Warehousemen Local No 554

The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.

—
6
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No 238

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
7
The Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition

to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…

Employment
8
Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 313

The Local Union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights;involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is treated…

—
9
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

—
10
International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

—
11
General Teamstersprofessional & Technical Employees Local Union 916

To provide support for its members through labor negotiations, collective bargaining agreements and by working towards eliminating unfair labor practices.

—
12
International Brotherhood of 856 Tcwh Freight Checkers Clerical

Labor Union

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund; the most unlike its peers is Youth Helpers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Teamsters All Charities Fund: $50,500 · OtherTeamsters All Charities FundTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $44,196 · OtherTeamsters' Joint Council No 7INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010: $20,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010TEAMSTERS NATIONAL BLACK CAUCUS: $16,500 · OtherTEAMSTERS NATIONAL BLACK CAUCUSSan Francisco Labor Council: $7,846 · OtherCENTRAL COAST LABOR COUNCIL: $7,500 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $6,700 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $55,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTER…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $32,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FU…PEGGY BROWNING FUND: $20,000 · EducationPEGGY BROWNING FUNDLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $26,200 · HealthLOS ANGEL…YOUTH HELPERS INC: $20,960 · ReligionAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $13,500 · InternationalThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$153,242Education$107,000Health$26,200Religion$20,960International$13,500Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $55,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTeamsters All Charities Fund: $50,500 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $44,196 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $32,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $26,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH HELPERS INC: $20,960 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTEAMSTERS NATIONAL BLACK CAUCUS: $16,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $13,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSan Francisco Labor Council: $7,846 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL COAST LABOR COUNCIL: $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Brother…Sanitary Truck Driver…Teamsters Local 1932Teamsters Local 986 C…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…Teamsters Automotive …International Brother…
International Brotherhood of 063 TCWHCA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH · Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San · Teamsters Local 1932 · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical · Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home