Skip to content
International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH at a glance

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH

To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$194kEducation$177kMembership Benefit$41kCivil Rights$40kPhilanthropy$25kHousing & Shelter$15kCommunity Improvement$6k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $70,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $167,284 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $96,784 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Teamsters Scholarship Fund$35,000
LAANE$15,000
Worker Solidarity and Defense$15,000
OC Labor Federation AFL-CIO$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OC Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $23k → 10%All Charities Teamsters: $6k → 10%Inland Empire Labor Council: $10k → 11%No on Prop 22spnrd by Labor: $40k → 12%Teamsters Joint Council 42: $10k → 14%Teamsters Scholarship Fund: $85k → 14%Worker Solidarity and Defense: $15k → 9%OC Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $7k → 10%JC 42 Charity Fund: $8k → 14%Teamsters Scholarship Fund: $35k → 14%Orange County Labor Federatio: $6k → 10%JC 42 Charity Fund: $6k → 14%JRHMS: $25k → 14%OC Labor Federation AFL-CIO: $6k → 10%JC 42 Charity Fund: $6k → 14%JRHMS: $12k → 14%Colettes Childrens Home: $15k → 10%Teamsters Local 986 Charity F: $6k → 14%JRHMS: $10k → 14%LA County Federation of Labor: $20k → 14%LA County Federation of Labor: $14k → 14%LA County Federation of Labor: $8k → 14%LA County Federation of Labor: $6k → 14%LA County Federation of Labor: $6k → 14%LA County Federation of Labor: $6k → 14%LAANE: $16k → 14%LAANE: $15k → 14%LAANE: $14k → 14%LAANE: $14k → 14%LAANE: $13k → 14%LAANE: $13k → 14%LAANE: $10k → 14%LAANE: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 6 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$386k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+27%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyEmploymentHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +19%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO
    6× · 2017–2023 · $59k · revenue +19%
  • JR
    JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $47k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • NO
    No on Prop 22spnrd by Labor
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • CC
    COLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -10%
  • IB
    International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Councilgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
2
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
3
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

—
4
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
5
Laborers International Union Local 4

Improvement of Workers Conditions, wages and benefits

—
6
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

—
7
The Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition

to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…

Employment
8
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
9
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 342

Labor union representing the electrical worker force

—
10
Laborers International Union of State of Mi

Collective bargaining and representation

—
11
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 957

Labor union

—
12
Intl Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 252

The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund; the most unlike its peers is Colette's Children's Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $120,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS S…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $46,500 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND …PEGGY BROWNING FUND: $10,000 · EducationPEGGY BROWNING FUNDLOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO: $58,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABO…ORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CIO: $41,050 · OtherORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CI…No on Prop 22spnrd by Labor: $40,000 · OtherNo on Prop 22spnrd by LaborInternational Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council: $10,000 · OtherInternational Brotherhood of 42 Joint…INLAND EMPIRE LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE COUNTIES: $10,000 · OtherINLAND EMPIRE LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO S…+1 more: $5,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $100,500 · HealthLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE F…The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $19,000 · PhilanthropyWORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EmploymentCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterTeamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc: $6,100 · Community Improvement
Education$176,500Other$165,050Health$100,500Philanthropy$19,000Employment$15,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Community Improvement$6,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $120,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $100,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO: $58,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $46,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CIO: $41,050 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetThe Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc: $19,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetWORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE COUNTIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTeamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc: $6,100 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTeamsters All Charities Fund: $5,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Teamsters Local 1932International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…Teamsters Local 986 C…International Brother…International Brother…Sanitary Truck Driver…International Brother…Teamsters Union Local…
Teamsters Local 1932CA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Teamsters Local 1932 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · International Brotherhood of 911 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers · Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San · International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical · Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home