· Public charity
Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt
To organize all workers eligible for membership, regardless of religion, race, creed, color, national origin, age or sex.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $79,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $669,759 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $590,259 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $35,000 |
| WORKERS SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION | $14,500 |
| TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC | $10,000 |
| HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC | $10,000 |
| TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174 | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IBINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC3× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue +26%
- TLTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC7× · 2017–2024 · $60k · revenue +113% · 36% of their budget
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $18k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $15k
- JGJENNIFERS GIFT OF HOPE INCone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -89%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.
The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.
The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.
To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.
To provide financial assistance to members of teamsters local 830 who are employed by participating employers and to the members' dependent children who have demonstrated scholastic ability, good character and qualities of leadership and…
The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
Teamsters local 1205 timothy lynch memorial scholarship fund exists for the purpose of making college education more easily accessible to the children and dependents of international brotherhood of teamsters local 1205 by providing…
To organize all workers eligible for membership, regardless of religion, race, creed, color, national origin, age or sex. to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organization, negotiation…
To provide scholarships for families of local union members.
To organize workers and to secure improved wages, benefits and working conditions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund and the most unlike its peers is Thomas R O'donnell Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
- Who funds INTL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 174 ↗
- Who funds NEUROFIBROMATOSIS INC NORTHEAST ↗
- Who funds WORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JENNIFERS GIFT OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS R O'DONNELL SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 10 NEW ENGLAND SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds TEAMSTERS LOCAL 299 COMMUNITY SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WORCESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Teamsters All Charities Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Club of Worcester Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.