Skip to content

· Public charity

INTEGRIS Health INC

Partnering with people to live healthier lives.

$298k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$47MEducation$1.5MPhilanthropy$639kCommunity Improvement$588kArts & Culture$533kRecreation & Sports$191kHuman Services$55kEmployment$15k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
$12,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER$100,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC$85,000
Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation$50,000
GREAT 100 NURSES FOUNDATION$15,000
FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION$12,500
American Heart Association$11,740
STATE CHAMBER OF OKLAHOMA$10,000
OKLAHOMA NURSES ASSOCIATION$5,000
Oklahoma County Medical Society$5,000
University of Central Oklahoma Foundation$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED INC: $111k → 16%YMCA: $11k → 16%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED: $136k → 16%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED: $129k → 16%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED: $122k → 16%CALM WATERS CTRFOR CHILDREN &FAMILIESINC: $19k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%AMERICAN INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100k → 16%OKLAHOMA CITY BOATHOUSE FOUNDATION: $40k → 16%FIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $13k → 16%ITN CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 14 repeat orgs$30M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$20M
$30M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IH
    INTEGRIS Health Edmond Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16M · revenue +140%
  • WV
    Western Village Academy Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $1.5M · revenue +48% · 25% of their budget
  • UW
    United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc
    6× · 2019–2025 · $629k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IR
    INTEGRIS Rural Health Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $30M · revenue +19%
  • RF
    RIVERSPORT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +69%
  • SP
    SCISSORTAIL PARK FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
2
Oklahoma Hospital Association Inc

The mission of the Oklahoma Hospital Association is to promote the welfare of the public by representing its members and advocating on their behalf, providing services to assist its members in meeting the health care needs of their…

—
3
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

—
4
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
6
Osteopathic Founders Foundation

The mission of the osteopathic founders foundation is to support osteopathic medical education, to enhance the public's understanding of osteopathic medicine, and to improve the health of the community through projects consistent with the…

Health
7
Oklahoma Optometric Association

The oklahoma association of optometric physicians is a professional association dedicated to advocacy, education, and other resources for oklahoma optometric physicians. mission statement: unite. empower. advocate.

—
8
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
9
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
10
Oklahoma Association of Realtors

The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…

—
11
Oklahoma Dental Association

Fosters an awareness of the obligations and responsibilities of the dental profession to society, to help advance the art and science of dentistry, and to promote public health and health services in the state of oklahoma.

—
12
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yukon Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTEGRIS Rural Health Inc: $30,000,000 · HealthINTEGRIS Rural Health IncINTEGRIS Health Edmond Inc: $16,000,000 · HealthINTEGRIS Health Edmond Inc+5 more: $262,190 · HealthWestern Village Academy Inc: $1,500,000 · Education+2 more: $44,000 · EducationHealth Alliance for the Uninsured: $497,055 · Human ServicesFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $412,500 · Human ServicesRIVERSPORT FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Human Services+3 more: $50,450 · Human ServicesGREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $552,905 · OtherJIM THORPE ASSOCIATION INC: $126,000 · OtherThe State Chamber Research Foundation: $29,454 · OtherSCISSORTAIL PARK FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Other+3 more: $15,240 · OtherUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $629,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $110,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED ARTS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGREAT 100 NURSES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EmploymentTRI-STATE FAMILY YMCA: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$46,262,190Education$1,544,000Human Services$1,000,005Other$748,599Philanthropy$639,000Arts & Culture$120,000Employment$15,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTEGRIS Rural Health Inc: $30,000,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetINTEGRIS Health Edmond Inc: $16,000,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWestern Village Academy Inc: $1,500,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetUnited Way of Central Oklahoma Inc: $629,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $552,905 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHealth Alliance for the Uninsured: $497,055 over 4y, 10% of budgetFIRST AMERICANS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $412,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $131,250 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetJIM THORPE ASSOCIATION INC: $126,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY NATIONAL MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $110,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $56,740 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSPORT FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $34,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe State Chamber Research Foundation: $29,454 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetVariety Care Foundation Inc: $27,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetITNCENTRAL OKLAHOMA: $20,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetFoundation for a Healthy Oklahoma: $12,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $11,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYukon Chamber of Commerce: $5,240 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA NURSES ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTRI-STATE FAMILY YMCA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Arvest Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization INTEGRIS Health INC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from INTEGRIS Health INC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • First Americans Museum Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on INTEGRIS Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph