Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Institute for Survivor Care Inc

The institute for shelter care equips christian ministries with the knowledge, skills, tools, and community needed to provide exemplary restorative care to the sexually exploited.

$378k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $249,157 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $378,165 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $129,008 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $227k
$25,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE MOBILIZATION INC$25,000
STARFISH PROJECT INCORPORATED$25,000
COMPASSION FIRST$25,000
WILLOW INTERNATIONAL$25,000
NOMI NETWORK$25,000
RAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC$25,000
LIFE FOR THE INNOCENT$25,000
EL POZO DE VIDA$25,000
PROJECT SUMA INC$14,129
EMBERS INTERNATIONAL$13,254
MUKTI$7,867
HOPE'S CRY INTERNATIONAL$7,199
HOSEAS HEART INC$6,708
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WILLOW INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 10%STARFISH PROJECT INCORPORATED: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MO
LA
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $119k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$45k · 38% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TO PROVIDE CHRISTIAN COUNTER-TRAFFICKING ORGANIZATIONS UNRESTRICTED FUNDING TO PURSUE THEIR MISSION TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND/OR CARE FOR SURVIVORS

South Asia$31k · 26% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TO PROVIDE CHRISTIAN COUNTER-TRAFFICKING ORGANIZATIONS UNRESTRICTED FUNDING TO PURSUE THEIR MISSION TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND/OR CARE FOR SURVIVORS · COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND/OR CARE FOR SURVIVORS

North America (Canada and Mexico)$25k · 21% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO PROVIDE CHRISTIAN COUNTER-TRAFFICKING ORGANIZATIONS UNRESTRICTED FUNDING TO PURSUE THEIR MISSION TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND/OR CARE FOR SURVIVORS

East Asia and the Pacific$18k · 15% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TO PROVIDE CHRISTIAN COUNTER-TRAFFICKING ORGANIZATIONS UNRESTRICTED FUNDING TO PURSUE THEIR MISSION TO COMBAT HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND/OR CARE FOR SURVIVORS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Untrafficked Inc
Human Services
2
Mukti International

Mukti is a Sanskrit word that means "freedom from oppression and exploitation". Our goal is to see women and children find pathways to freedom. We partner with organizations around Asia that are on the frontlines helping to rescue and…

Crime & Legal
3
Joy International

JOY International is dedicated to the prevention of child trafficking and to the freedom, healing, and empowerment of trafficked children, teens, and young adults worldwide.

Human Services
4
Eden Ministry

Eden Ministry seeks to advocate for trafficked victims in Asia to reach rescue and restore them from exploitation

Religion
5
Seven Sisters International

Seven Sisters International provides rehabilitative care to girls who have been rescued from trafficking and sexual abuse by offering medical and psychological services, social work, education, life skills training, job preparation, and…

Human Services
6
California Human Trafficking Investigators and Prosecuters Asso
Crime & Legal
7
Love Justice International

The mission of love justice international is driving the downfall of slavery by disrupting human trafficking in transit.

International
8
Mission 89 Inc

Fight human trafficking

9
Frontline Response International Inc

In the 21st century, far too many people are trapped in the darkness of sex trafficking and homelessness. frontline response is on the frontlines every day rescuing these individuals and preventing the most vulnerable in society, our…

Religion
10
Stichting Womens Initiatives for Gender Justice

Ending impunity for conflict related sexual violence

International
11
Sojourn House Inc

Sojourn House exists to defend, restore, and liberate women who have been trafficked or exploited.

Human Services
12
Angels Joy

Support victims of human trafficking.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nomi Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hoseas Heart Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOPE MOBILIZATION INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalHOPE MOBILIZATION INCRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INCNOMI NETWORK INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalNOMI NETWORK INCStarfish Project Incorporated — $25,000 · Human ServicesStarfish Project Incor…Willow International Everfree — $25,000 · Human ServicesWillow International E…COMPASSION FIRST — $25,000 · InternationalCOMPASSION FIRSTProject Suma Inc — $14,129 · InternationalProject Suma IncHOSEAS HEART INC — $6,708 · InternationalHOSEAS HEART INCLIFE FOR THE INNOCENT — $25,000 · ReligionLIFE FOR THE INNOCEN…Embers International — $13,254 · ReligionEmbers InternationalHOPE'S CRY INTERNATIONAL — $7,199 · ReligionHOPE'S CRY INTERNATI…El Pozo de Vida — $25,000 · PhilanthropyEl Pozo de …MUKTI — $7,867 · Other
Crime & Legal$75,000Human Services$50,000International$45,837Religion$45,453Philanthropy$25,000Other$7,867

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIFE FOR THE INNOCENT — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEl Pozo de Vida — $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rescue- Freedom InternationalWA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rescue- Freedom International · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Institute for Survivor Care Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Institute for Survivor Care Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Institute for Survivor Care Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph