How much did RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL grant in FY2025?

Human Services$2.5MCrime & Legal$1.3MInternational$703kHousing & Shelter$575kReligion$548kCommunity Improvement$224kEducation$59kArts & Culture$20kOther$841k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

prevention restorationrestoration safe

2022

prevention researchresearch educationeducation advocacyadvocacy restoration

2023

prevention researchresearch educationeducation advocacyadvocacy restoration

2024

prevention researchresearch educationeducation advocacyadvocacy restoration

2025

prevention researchresearch educationeducation advocacyadvocacy restoration

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k19 grants · $472k
$50k–250k10 grants · $877k

$40,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

EverFree$219,679
International Generosity Foundation$158,800
Justice Ventures International$102,500
Hosea's Heart$61,500
Starfish Project$60,000
Street Grace$60,000
Hope's Cry International$58,400
Seven Sisters International$56,500
Restore NYC$50,000
The Well House$50,000
Ancora TN$45,000
EPIK Project$45,000
Engedi Refuge Ministries$40,389
ALIGHT Mobilizing Justice$40,000
Tides Center$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 49% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.9M · 21 repeat orgs$881k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.9M

$611k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%

+564%

Still filing today

95%

14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $270k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesInternationalReligionCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

E
Everfree
3× · 2023–2025 · $607k · revenue +672%
SG
Street Grace
4× · 2022–2025 · $468k · revenue +419%
RN
Restore NYC
4× · 2022–2025 · $458k · revenue +97%

Funded once

1T
10 Thousand Windows
one grant, 2022 · $88k · revenue -78%
RN
Restore NYC
one grant, 2021 · $61k
SG
Street Grace
one grant, 2021 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Harriets House

Providing shelter for victims of human trafficking

Housing & Shelter

Center to Combat Human Trafficking

—

California Human Trafficking

Crime & Legal

Not Abandoned

To prevent and end sex slavery worldwide

Crime & Legal

Eden Ministry

To give shelter counsel education and work to women and men caught in human trafficking

Religion

Freed Life

Freed Life exists to eradicate human trafficking through empowering survivors, equipping communities and changing systems.

—

Prevention Now Inc

Prevention now leverages data and technology to stop human trafficking before it starts.

Human Services

Redeem and Restore Center Inc

Prevention, intervention, and restoration of women that have been trapped into the sex trafficking industry

Health

Mission 89 Inc

Fight human trafficking

—

Nightlight International

Nightlight is an international organization compelled by love to reach out to, rescue, and restore all those who are negatively impacted by sex trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation.

Crime & Legal

Safety Compass

Offer support for survivors of commercial sexual exploitation and sex-trafficking.

Human Services

Call to Freedom

To provide supportive services to victims of human trafficking and sexual exploitation.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Refuge for Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tides Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/39

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,526

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

35/37

Grantees still filing

31/37

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$2,508,300Crime & Legal$1,259,589Other$919,938International$702,731Housing & Shelter$575,107Religion$547,533Community Improvement$223,882

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jensen Project IncTX15.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jensen Project Inc · Human Investment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Dressember Foundation · Safe House Project Inc · Stewardship Foundation · Serving USA Inc · Servant Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Rain Collective.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue held over 3 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 871158957 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Rain Collective, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 62% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Rescue- Freedom International?

Find your warmest path to Rescue- Freedom International through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rescue- Freedom International?

More from the funding graph

RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

37 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Rescue- Freedom International?

More from the funding graph