Skip to content
Institute for Mental Health & Wellness at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Institute for Mental Health & Wellness

AS EXPRESSIONS OF GOD'S HEALING LOVE, WITNESSED THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF JESUS, WE ARE STEADFAST IN SERVING ALL, ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO ARE POOR AND VULNERABLE.

$1.2M
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$27MHousing & Shelter$1.6MPhilanthropy$998kCommunity Improvement$854kHuman Services$810kEducation$402kArts & Culture$268kPublic Benefit$150kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION$1,200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CAMBODIAN FAMILY COMMUNITY CENTER: $510k → 10%NORCAL OUTREACH PROJECT: $150k → 14%SANTA ROSA VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $300k → 9%MIND OC: $400k → 10%MIND OC: $250k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
MO
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Institute for Mental Health & Wellness’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 55%.

Institute for Mental Health & Wellnesslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25M · 19 repeat orgs$6.1M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
29

Total granted

$25M
$6.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+24%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - SO CALIFORNIA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $5.0M · revenue +20%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $4.3M · revenue +15%
  • PA
    PROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2022 · $1.4M · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • AH
    ALIADOS HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $799k · revenue +169%
  • QO
    QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $682k
  • THE CAMBODIAN FAMILYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $510k · revenue +85% · 41% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Providence St Joseph Health Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Philanthropy
2
Providence Health & Services

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
3
Pacmed Clinics

Our mission is to provide respectful, high-quality, patient-focused healthcare to each person and to the communities we serve. pacmed welcomes patients from the well insured to those who cannot afford healthcare.

Health
4
St Joseph Home Care Network

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Human Services
5
Covenant Health System Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
6
Srm Alliance Hospital Services

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
7
St Joseph Hospital of Eureka

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
8
St Patrick Hospital Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
9
Providence Trinitycare Hospice

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

—
10
Providence Saint John's Medical Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
11
Covenant Health System

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
12
Providence Portland Medical Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence Saint John's Health Center; the most unlike its peers is Fannie E Rippel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
38/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM: $5,315,652 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEMPROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - SO CALIFORNIA: $4,975,656 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - SO CALIFORNIAST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC: $4,266,029 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLCPROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION: $1,350,000 · HealthPROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATIONMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $1,210,580 · HealthPROVIDENCE SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER: $1,176,168 · HealthALIADOS HEALTH: $799,103 · Health+13 more: $3,855,776 · Health+13 morePROVIDENCE MEDICAL INSTITUTE: $686,538 · OtherPROVIDENCE …QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $681,818 · OtherQUEEN OF TH…COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $500,000 · OtherCOMMITTEE O…EMOTIONAL WELL-BEING INITIATIVE: $183,573 · OtherEMOTIONAL W…AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION: $125,000 · OtherBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC: $400,000 · OtherBIPARTISAN …Prevention Institute: $196,301 · OtherPrevention …+7 more: $364,000 · Other+7 moreMIND OC: $650,000 · Human ServicesTHE CAMBODIAN FAMILY: $509,844 · Human ServicesThe Santa Rosa Veterans Memorial Foundation Inc: $300,000 · Human ServicesNORCAL OUTREACH PROJECT: $150,000 · Human ServicesInst for People Place Possibility: $1,039,600 · Community ImprovementNONPROFIT FINANCE FUND: $150,000 · Community ImprovementENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $125,000 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK: $75,000 · Community ImprovementPROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION: $938,323 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyFANNIE E RIPPEL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $7,650 · PhilanthropyTRUST FOR AMERICAS HEALTH: $660,600 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $301,893 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $100,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $481,526 · Civil Rights
Health$22,948,964Other$3,137,230Human Services$1,609,844Community Improvement$1,389,600Philanthropy$1,145,973Education$1,062,493Civil Rights$481,526

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM: $5,315,652 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM - SO CALIFORNIA: $4,975,656 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LLC: $4,266,029 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE ALASKA FOUNDATION: $1,350,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $1,210,580 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER: $1,176,168 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE LITTLE COMPANY OF MARY FOUNDATION: $938,323 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH: $799,103 over 1y, 19% of budgetPROVIDENCE MEDICAL INSTITUTE: $686,538 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER: $681,818 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRUST FOR AMERICAS HEALTH: $660,600 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetST MARY MEDICAL CENTER: $655,852 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIND OC: $650,000 over 2y, 50% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES FOUNDATION SAN FERNANDO & SANTA CLARITA VALLEYS SA: $619,812 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE CAMBODIAN FAMILY: $509,844 over 1y, 41% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS: $500,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER: $489,200 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $481,526 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPROVIDENCE ST JOSEPH HEALTH: $425,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED STATES OF CARE CAMPAIGN: $425,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetBIPARTISAN POLICY CENTER INC: $400,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $301,893 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $250,506 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH HOSPITAL OF ORANGE: $247,073 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON: $233,333 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInseparable Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetPrevention Institute: $196,301 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetCovenant Health: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNONPROFIT FINANCE FUND: $150,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION: $125,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICYLINK: $75,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOWN INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGROWTH PHILANTHROPY NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerica Walks Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $7,650 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…California Physicians…The Robert Wood Johns…East Bay Community Fo…The Kresge FoundationThe Commonwealth FundCalifornia Community …The California Wellne…Kaiser Foundation Hos…WK Kellogg FoundationNational Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…
The California EndowmentCA18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · The Commonwealth Fund · California Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · WK Kellogg Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Institute for Mental Health & Wellness funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Institute for Mental Health & Wellness. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc: 22% of income from government
  • National Association of Community Health Centers Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Institute for Mental Health & Wellness’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home