Skip to content

· Private foundation

Institute for Law & Systems Research

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$501kEnvironment$155kYouth Development$27kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$4kCommunity Improvement$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$537k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST SCHOOL OF WOODEN BOAT BUI$100,000
SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM$25,950
SYNERGY ARTS FOUNDATION$5,025
VOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION$3,000
COMMUNITY BOAT PROJECT$2,000
KPBS$1,200
ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Children of the Nations: $480 → 10%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%Elderhelp: $2k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $1k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 51% of Institute for Law & Systems Research’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 41%.

Institute for Law & Systems Researchlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$626k · 12 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$626k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+5%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding
    8× · 2017–2024 · $337k · revenue +82%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $143k · revenue +48%
  • VM
    VOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +513%

Funded once

  • CC
    Canebrake County Water District
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
  • SJ
    SOUTHWESTERN JUNIOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -32% · 49% of their budget
  • DO
    DIGNITY OF MAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -89%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nature Collective

Nature collective's mission is to drive a passion for nature for all. we think inclusively and diversely when serving those devoid of nature those who remember nature and want to connect back to it and those who have an affinity with…

Environment
2
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
3
San Diego Habitat Conservancy

Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.

Arts & Culture
4
Zoological Society of San Diego

San diego zoo wildlife alliance is committed to saving species worldwide by uniting our expertise in wildlife care and conservation science with our dedication to inspiring passion for nature.

Animals
5
San Diego Bird Alliance

Together we defend the regions birds, unique biodiversity and threatened habitats through advocacy, education and restoration.

Environment
6
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
7
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
8
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
9
California Institute of Environmental Studies

The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.

Animals
10
San Diego Canyonlands Inc

To promote, protect and restore the natural habitats in San Diego County's canyons and creeks. We do this by fostering education and ongoing community involvement in stewardship and advocacy, and by collaborating with other organizations.

Environment
11
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
12
Schmidt Ocean Institute
Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Society of Natural History; the most unlike its peers is Dignity of Man Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding: $336,825 · Arts & CultureNorthwest School of Wooden BoatbuildingSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $143,485 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureVOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherVOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUND…Canebrake County Water District: $39,726 · OtherCanebrake County Wate…Community Boat Project: $22,000 · OtherCommunity Boat Projec…DIGNITY OF MAN FOUNDATION: $6,500 · OtherKPBS: $6,400 · OtherSYNERGY ARTS FOUNDATION: $5,025 · Other+11 more: $11,512 · Other+11 moreSOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL: $32,500 · EnvironmentWILDCOAST: $5,000 · EnvironmentTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $29,050 · PhilanthropySOUTHWESTERN JUNIOR FOUNDATION: $20,232 · Recreation & SportsELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $6,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $480 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,666 · Housing & Shelter
Arts & Culture$481,310Other$136,163Environment$37,500Philanthropy$29,050Recreation & Sports$20,232Human Services$6,980Housing & Shelter$2,666

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding: $336,825 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $143,485 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetVOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetSOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL: $32,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION: $29,050 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN JUNIOR FOUNDATION: $20,232 over 1y, 49% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWILDCOAST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC: $2,666 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $2,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $1,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILD FISH CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAcademy of Music for the Blind: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $480 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Northwest School of Wooden Boatbuilding ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds VOLCAN MOUNTAIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOLAR ENERGY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN JUNIOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds DIGNITY OF MAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILDCOAST ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE ACTION CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds WILD FISH CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Academy of Music for the Blind ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Sempra Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Institute for Law & Systems Research funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Institute for Law & Systems Research. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Institute for Law & Systems Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph