Skip to content
Innogroup Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Innogroup Foundation Inc

To support organizations whose purpose is to improve community resources such as water, housing, education, and job opporunities in poverty stricken communities.

$193k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$666kCommunity Improvement$373kCrime & Legal$359kEducation$193kReligion$172kHuman Services$26kEnvironment$25kPhilanthropy$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $94,602, the rows itemized in this filing. The $192,572 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $97,970 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $81k
$16,045
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mission of Hope$39,265
Outdoor Discovery Network$25,223
Pioneers USA$16,045
Compassion International$8,069
All Shores Wesleyan Church$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 46% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%QUEST INSTITUE FOR QUALITY: $14k → 8%Baptist Haiti Mission: $224k → 6%ISM NZ NORTH AMERICA: $20k → 16%Pioneers USA: $16k → 13%Make-A-Wish Michigan: $11k → 5%IGLESIA ALAS DE AGUILA: $10k → 8%Innocademy Allegan: $17k → 10%PARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $205k → 11%come over and help: $12k → 15%Presbyterian Reformed Ministries Int: $20k → 12%Samaritan's Purse: $11k → 21%Compassion International: $8k → 9%Multiplication Network Ministries: $10k → 14%Teen Challenge - Mid Atlantic: $6k → 17%THE CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HAITI MISSION SOCIETY INC: $30k → 15%MISSION OF HOPE HAITI: $150k → 6%ISM NZ North AM: $10k → 16%Iglesia Alas DeAguila: $10k → 8%Outdoor Discovery Network: $25k → 10%PARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $186k → 11%New Horizons Foundation: $5k → 9%Mission of Hope: $140k → 6%Global Outreach Ministries: $21k → 8%Community Action House: $14k → 10%Partners Worldwide: $104k → 11%Mission of Hope: $136k → 6%CORNERSTONE UNITED REFORMED CHURCH: $17k → 8%Calvary Schools of Holland: $7k → 10%Partners Worldwide: $33k → 11%Baptist Haiti Mission: $15k → 6%Jenison Christian School: $11k → 8%ACTS Holland: $7k → 10%Partners Worldwide: $29k → 11%Michigan Fire Juniors: $9k → 8%Partners Worldwide: $22k → 11%Jenison Christian School: $10k → 8%National Christian Foundation: $8k → 11%LOVE INC: $6k → 8%Uptown Church: $10k → 11%All Shores Wesleyan Church: $6k → 8%Tisbest: $8k → 11%All Shores Wesleyan Church: $6k → 8%Tent Schools Int: $6k → 11%ICADEMY GLOBAL: $100k → 8%INNOCADEMY PARENT ORGANIZATION: $31k → 8%INNOCADEMY PARENT ORGANIZATION (IPO): $20k → 8%Love For A Child: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
CA
CO
KY
VA
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Innogroup Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 41%.

Innogroup Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 9 repeat orgs$509k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
20

Total granted

$1.3M
$459k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+20%

Still filing today

56%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalEducationCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PARTNERS WORLDWIDE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $578k · revenue +37%
  • MO
    Mission of Hope
    4× · 2021–2024 · $359k · revenue -29% · 42% of their budget
  • BH
    Baptist Haiti Mission
    2× · 2019–2020 · $239k

Funded once

  • MO
    MISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue -34%
  • IG
    ICADEMY GLOBAL
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • TC
    THE CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HAITI MISSION SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
4
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
5
Joy in the Harvest

To serve Christ by providing expertise, resources, and leadership to help the church make Christian Disciples in foreign lands, and to render assistance to the poor, sick, and needy in our places of service.

Religion
6
New Churches Now Inc

To spread the love of christ by providing physical, mental and spiritual aid to people in countries around the world through estalbishing churches and biblically faith-based communities.

International
7
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
8
MissionNext Inc

To connect God's people with the good works He is preparing them to do for Kingdom impact. We accomplish this through our Web-based matching services known as MissionNext Journey and MissionNext Education and and by working closely with…

—
9
Indigenous Ministries International Inc

The purpose of IMI is reaching nationals through nationals in ministry.

Religion
10
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
11
Across Nations

Across nations is dedicated to spreading the gospel through establishing, developing and promoting all aspects of church ministry.

Religion
12
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission of Hope Inc Mission of Hope Haiti Inc; the most unlike its peers is Come Over & Help Organization. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $577,820 · InternationalPARTNERS WORLDWIDE+3 more: $25,272 · InternationalBaptist Haiti Mission: $238,923 · OtherBaptist Haiti MissionICADEMY GLOBAL: $100,000 · OtherICADEMY GLOBALInnocademy Parent Organization: $50,650 · OtherInnocademy Parent OrganizationTHE CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST HAITI MISSION SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · OtherOUTDOOR DISCOVERY NETWORK: $25,223 · OtherGlobal Outreach Ministries: $21,280 · OtherIGLESIA ALAS DE AGUILA - EAGLES WIN GS CHURCH: $20,200 · Other+9 more: $103,327 · Other+9 moreMission of Hope: $358,823 · Crime & LegalMission of HopeMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $150,000 · ReligionMISSION OF HOP…ISM NZ NORTH AMERICA: $30,000 · ReligionISM NZ NORTH A…PRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $29,704 · ReligionPRESBYTERIAN R…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,783 · ReligionMULTIPLICATION NETWORK MINISTRIES: $10,000 · ReligionJENISON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $20,510 · EducationTHE QUEST INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUC: $14,385 · EducationCALVARY SCHOOLS OF HOLLAND: $7,200 · EducationNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyTISBEST PHILANTHROPY: $7,725 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $5,228 · PhilanthropyGEORGETOWN RANGERS SOCCER CLUB: $8,500 · Recreation & SportsWET FEET - ACTS: $6,800 · Youth Development
International$603,092Other$589,603Crime & Legal$358,823Religion$230,487Education$42,095Philanthropy$20,953Recreation & Sports$8,500Youth Development$6,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $577,820 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetMission of Hope: $358,823 over 4y, 42% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE INC MISSION OF HOPE HAITI INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetInnocademy Parent Organization: $50,650 over 2y, 19% of budgetISM NZ NORTH AMERICA: $30,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $29,704 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetOUTDOOR DISCOVERY NETWORK: $25,223 over 1y, 13% of budgetJENISON CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $20,510 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE QUEST INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUC: $14,385 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $13,680 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOME OVER & HELP ORGANIZATION: $11,703 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,783 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLICATION NETWORK MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGETOWN RANGERS SOCCER CLUB: $8,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTISBEST PHILANTHROPY: $7,725 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLove Your Neighbor of West Michigan: $5,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTent Schools International: $5,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $5,228 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barnabas FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Raymond James Charita…Renaissance Charitabl…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…The Bank of America C…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Barnabas FoundationIL19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barnabas Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Innogroup Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Innogroup Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Innogroup Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Innogroup Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Innogroup’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home