Skip to content
Inland Empire Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Inland Empire Community Foundation

Strengthening the Inland Empire through Philanthropy.

$25M
Granted FY2025still arriving
293
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$33MEducation$27MHuman Services$15MEnvironment$10MHealth$9.2MCommunity Improvement$8.6MPhilanthropy$8.5MArts & Culture$7.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 293 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 293 grants below total $21,919,684, the rows itemized in this filing. The $24,530,991 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,611,307 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $265k
  • $10k–50k166 grants · $3.2M
  • $50k–250k65 grants · $6.6M
  • $250k+26 grants · $12M
$20,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$169M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Partners$1,000,000
Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services Inc (NPHS)$980,000
GRID Alternatives Inland Empire$765,942
Northwest Arkansas Food Bank$750,000
JobWorks Education and Training Systems (JETS)$716,646
Congregations Organized for Prophetic Engagement$650,420
Blu Educational Foundation$566,420
PCC Hydrogen$501,000
Voltu Motor Inc$500,000
Inland Empire Labor Institute$486,262
Ryvid Inc$453,729
Inland Congregations United For Change$437,361
Manufacturers' Council of the Inland Empire$410,000
Starting Over Inc$350,000
City of Moreno Valley$325,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Episcopal Relief and Development: $1.0M → 17%Rockwall County Helping Hands Helping Hands: $150k → 5%Second Helpings: $99k → 10%World Food Program USA: $1.0M → 14%Youth in Need: $250k → 5%Adopt A Native Elder: $100k → 8%American Indian Youth Running Strong Inc: $100k → 6%Episcopal Relief and Development: $1.0M → 17%Rockwall County Helping Hands: $100k → 5%Episcopal Relief and Development: $990k → 17%Faith in Action of San Gorgonio Pass: $78k → 11%Inland Caregivers Resource Center: $125k → 14%Homeless Health Care Los Angeles: $250k → 14%California Family Life Center: $125k → 11%Children's Fund Inc: $160k → 14%Cathedral City Senior Center: $80k → 11%Regional Access Project Foundation: $376k → 11%Regional Access Project Foundation: $292k → 11%Regional Access Project Foundation: $100k → 11%Cove Communities Senior Association: $93k → 11%Cove Communities Senior Association dba The Joslyn Center: $70k → 11%Jewish Family Service of the Desert: $599k → 11%Family Health & Support Network: $95k → 11%IE Rebound: $70k → 14%Janet Goeske Foundation: $100k → 11%Altavita Village Community Foundation: $257k → 11%San Bernardino Fatherhood: $70k → 14%OPARC: $186k → 14%Hope Through Housing Foundation: $246k → 14%Operation New Hope: $155k → 14%Centro Del Inmigrante Inc: $72k → 11%Academy for Grassroots Organizations: $315k → 14%Victor Valley Family Resource Center: $134k → 14%Victor Valley Family Resource Center: $93k → 14%Galilee Center: $110k → 11%Hemet Hospice Volunteers IncCommunity Hospice Services: $206k → 11%Operation Safe House Inc: $161k → 11%God's Fan Club: $100k → 11%Kamali'i Foster Family Agency Inc: $70k → 11%TODEC Legal Center: $367k → 11%TODEC Legal Center: $164k → 11%TODEC Legal Center: $128k → 11%TODEC Legal Center: $68k → 11%Martha's Village and Kitchen Inc: $177k → 11%Martha's Village and Kitchen Inc: $135k → 11%Martha's Village and Kitchen Inc: $90k → 11%About Families Inc: $90k → 11%Martha's Village and Kitchen Inc: $89k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Inland Empire Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Inland Empire Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130M · 479 repeat orgs$33M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

479 repeat relationships: 214 still active in FY2025, 265 since wound down; 62 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

479
704

Total granted

$130M
$26M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+31%

Still filing today

87%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
    5× · 2018–2024 · $6.9M · revenue +40%
  • OREGON FOOD BANK
    5× · 2018–2024 · $6.9M · revenue +62%
  • AC
    ALTURA CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $5.7M · revenue +74% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • NW
    NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue +37%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF MY FAMILY
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M · revenue -208%
  • CO
    CITY OF FULLERTON
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
2
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

—
3
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
4
Inland Temporary Homes

Aims to reduce countywide homelessness while addressing each family's personal struggle with perpetuating homelessness and poverty in their children. Provides both transitional shelter and rapid re-housing options in addition to…

—
5
Interfaith Food Center

The mission of the interfaith food center is to provide nutritious food to our neighbors in an environment that nurtures dignitiy and respect.

Education
6
The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce

The Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce is a regional chamber formed in 2016 to support a diverse business community that spans nearly forty-five miles and serves the needs of nearly 500,000 visitors each year. As a business…

Community Improvement
7
Inland Behavioral & Health Services Inc

IBHS is dedicated to helping the community achieve and maintain general good health, education and welfare through commitment in providing excellent service in the areas of physical health care, substance abuse treatment, mental health…

Health
8
Inland Counties Legal Services

Inland Counties Legal Services (ICLS) mission is to pursue justice and equality for low-income individuals through counsel, advice, advocacy, and community education, treating all with dignity and respect. Over the last six decades, ICLS…

Crime & Legal
9
The Samaritan Center-Simi Valley

The mission of the Samaritan Center-Simi Valley is to offer people experiencing housing and food insecurity supportive services essential to human dignity.

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Food Bank of San Benito County

Our mission is to provide food, nutritional education, and advocacy for those in need within san benito county, while pursuing our ultimate vision that no resident will suffer from hunger or malnutrition in san benito county.

Education
11
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
12
San Fernando Valley Interfaith Council Inc

With compassion, collaboration and commitment to action, vic provides services and program that engage and enrich the lives of older adults, families, and youth through a lens of inclusion to strengthen diverse communities in the valley

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Sol Neighborhood Educational Center; the most unlike its peers is Bordando Nuestras Raices. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

1013 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1013 of the 1,264 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

101
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
340
Early backer (in before they grew)
965/1013
Grantees still filing
694/1013
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $6,930,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKOREGON FOOD BANK: $6,890,169 · OtherOREGON FOOD BANKTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,186,000 · OtherSAN BERNARDINO RIVERSIDE COUNTIES UNION SERVICES: $3,327,629 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $2,907,273 · Other+101 more: $57,645,809 · Other+101 moreALTURA CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION: $5,661,541 · EducationALTURA CREDIT U…ONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $2,889,804 · EducationONEFUTURE COACH…BLU Educational Foundation: $2,673,589 · EducationBLU Educational…DESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,047,958 · EducationDESERT SCHOLARS…UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORPORATION AT CSUSB: $767,766 · EducationWOODCREST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SYSTEM: $696,269 · EducationMT San Jacinto Community College Foundation: $631,294 · Education+14 more: $4,419,453 · Education+14 moreEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $2,989,975 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL…FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS O…Todec Legal Center Perris: $843,683 · Human ServicesTodec Leg…REGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION: $822,900 · Human ServicesREGIONAL …MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $785,853 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S …JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF THE DESERT: $628,955 · Human ServicesACADEMY FOR GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATIONS: $425,800 · Human Services+19 more: $4,695,204 · Human Services+19 moreKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $1,250,000 · Food & NutritionHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $1,025,000 · Food & NutritionMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $946,080 · Food & NutritionTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $922,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES: $784,500 · Food & NutritionFEEDING KENTUCKY INC: $590,000 · Food & NutritionVITAMIN ANGEL ALLIANCE INC: $525,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding the Gulf Coast: $499,261 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY: $380,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $365,000 · Food & Nutrition+8 more: $1,931,255 · Food & NutritionFONTANA FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $3,500,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $680,657 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $625,000 · PhilanthropyThe Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc: $531,850 · PhilanthropyCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $457,539 · PhilanthropyStreams in the Desert Foundation Inc DBA High Desert Community Foundation Inc: $406,777 · PhilanthropyINLAND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 211: $380,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $202,509 · PhilanthropySEASHARE: $1,755,000 · Community ImprovementYouth Action Project Inc: $1,402,835 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,120,479 · Community ImprovementIDYLLWILD HELP CENTER: $526,660 · Community ImprovementMANUFACTURERS' COUNCIL OF THE INLAND EMPIRE: $410,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: $221,855 · Community Improvement+1 more: $170,000 · Community ImprovementNeuro Vitality Foundation: $913,732 · HealthReach Out: $613,331 · HealthCommunity Health Action Network: $536,712 · HealthAutism Society Inland Empire Inc: $347,245 · HealthClay Counseling Foundation: $336,750 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation: $250,000 · HealthPHELAN MCDERMID SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $217,000 · HealthMICHELLES PLACE CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $196,006 · HealthREDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $195,000 · HealthInspire Life Skills Training Inc: $185,000 · HealthST MARY MEDICAL CENTER: $175,000 · HealthRIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $157,400 · HealthCITY OF HOPE: $151,964 · HealthRiverside University Health System Foundation: $150,000 · Health
Other$81,886,880Education$18,787,674Human Services$12,192,370Food & Nutrition$9,218,596Philanthropy$6,784,332Community Improvement$5,606,829Health$4,425,140

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $6,930,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $6,890,169 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetALTURA CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION: $5,661,541 over 3y, 29% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,186,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFONTANA FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $3,500,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO RIVERSIDE COUNTIES UNION SERVICES: $3,327,629 over 5y, 51% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $2,989,975 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $2,907,273 over 5y, 67% of budgetONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $2,889,804 over 9y, 23% of budgetBLU Educational Foundation: $2,673,589 over 8y, 43% of budgetJURUPA MOUNTAINS CULTURAL CENTER: $2,456,027 over 9y, 55% of budgetInland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc: $2,224,892 over 7y, 16% of budgetCONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED FOR PROPHETIC ENGAGEMENT: $2,061,717 over 7y, 18% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMIZELL CENTER: $1,944,797 over 8y, 27% of budgetSEASHARE: $1,755,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $1,750,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetARTS CONNECTION: $1,746,198 over 7y, 59% of budgetJOBWORKS INC: $1,463,292 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetYouth Action Project Inc: $1,402,835 over 5y, 32% of budgetWarehouse Worker Resource Center: $1,387,946 over 7y, 21% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $1,269,159 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $1,250,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTime For Change Foundation: $1,209,792 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,120,479 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $1,109,766 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $1,082,038 over 9y, 11% of budgetDESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $1,047,958 over 2y, 20% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $1,029,924 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC: $1,025,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS: $985,314 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP HOUSING SERVICES INC: $980,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetMISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC: $946,080 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC: $922,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetNeuro Vitality Foundation: $913,732 over 2y, 55% of budgetStroke Recovery Center dba Neuro Vitality Center: $894,488 over 6y, 58% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris: $843,683 over 6y, 20% of budgetUNITED NETWORK FOR ORGAN SHARING: $836,208 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetREGIONAL ACCESS PROJECT FOUNDATION: $822,900 over 5y, 11% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $785,853 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES: $784,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES CORPORATION AT CSUSB: $767,766 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE INC: $760,846 over 7y, 30% of budgetSTARTING OVER INC: $706,182 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetWOODCREST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SYSTEM: $696,269 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $680,657 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMT San Jacinto Community College Foundation: $631,294 over 9y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALTURA CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FONTANA FOUNDATION OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds SAN BERNARDINO RIVERSIDE COUNTIES UNION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
  • Who funds ONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BLU Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JURUPA MOUNTAINS CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Inland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED FOR PROPHETIC ENGAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds MIZELL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEASHARE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds JOBWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Action Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Warehouse Worker Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Time For Change Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MY FAMILY ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DESERT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF ALABAMA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL RELIEF TEAMS ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI FOOD NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RIVER FOOD PANTRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Regional Access Proje…Bighorn Golf Club Cha…Anderson Childrens Fo…The Grace Helen Spear…HN and Frances C Berg…The Coeta and Donald …The Champions Volunte…IEHP FoundationHouston Family Founda…Inland Southern Calif…The Auen FoundationWestern Wind Foundati…
Regional Access Project FoundationCA133.3× affinity84 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Regional Access Project Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Anderson Childrens Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · IEHP Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · Inland Southern California United Way · The Auen Foundation · Western Wind Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Inland Empire Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Inland Empire Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
91report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1264 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Inland Empire’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home