How much does Ingram Foundation Inc give?

Ingram Foundation Inc reported 12 grants totaling $88,300 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 28 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.

What does Ingram Foundation Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Youth Development (67%), Animals (8%), Health (7%).

Who are Ingram Foundation Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Lake Berkeley Chapel Inc ($5k), Lifeline Animal Project Inc ($4k), NAMI National ($3k).

Does Ingram Foundation Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Ingram Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as Ingram Foundation Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Verizon Foundation, The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc, Jpmorgan Chase Foundation.

Where is Ingram Foundation Inc based?

Ingram Foundation Inc is based in GA.

Ingram Foundation Inc

Ingram Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Ingram Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$75k

Largest

01What it funds

0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$99kAnimals$11kHealth$11kReligion$10kEnvironment$5kEducation$4kHuman Services$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0

02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k11 grants · $13k
$50k–250k1 grant · $75k

$1,500

Median grant

States reached

$509k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION	$75,000
CENTRAL GEORGIA COUNCIL 96 BOY SCOU	$2,500
FLINT RIVER COUNCIL BSA	$2,500
NAMI	$1,500
ALPHA-1 FOUNDATION	$1,500
LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT	$1,500
AUBURN ALUMNI ASSOCIATION	$1,500
CHATTAHOOCHEE COUNCIL BSA	$1,000
PLANNED PETHOOD OF GEORIGA	$1,000
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY	$100
ASCPA	$100
AARP FOUNDATION	$100

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$41k · 24 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$41k

$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%

+40%

Still filing today

71%

34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

AnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LA
LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT INC
5× · 2019–2024 · $4k · revenue +89%
NN
NAMI National
4× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue +411%
AF
ALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC
4× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +26%

Funded once

CB
COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS
one grant, 2019 · $10k
LB
LAKE BERKELEY CHAPEL INC
one grant, 2019 · $5k
TA
TUKABATCHEE AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +31%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment

American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals

National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment

Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals

Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International

Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals

Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals

The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals

Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Wilderness Society; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

30/30

Grantees still filing

24/30

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$119,399Health$9,400Animals$7,800Environment$4,550Education$3,250Human Services$2,050Recreation & Sports$350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ13.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ingram Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ingram Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Ingram’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home