Skip to content
Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Food & Nutrition$83kCrime & Legal$53kHuman Services$51kArts & Culture$29kHealth$27kEducation$13kYouth Development$10kMembership Benefit$9kOther$0
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$327k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS$7,500
GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES$7,000
TRALEE CRISIS CENTER$3,500
DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER$3,000
PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER$3,000
PANHANDLE BREAST HEALTH$2,500
BRIDGES TO LIFE$2,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $11k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $10k → 17%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 20%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $8k → 17%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 20%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 20%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $7k → 17%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 20%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $7k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $6k → 17%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $5k → 20%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 20%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 20%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 20%THE BRIDGE - CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $3k → 20%GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$249k · 11 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$249k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+1%

Still filing today

55%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BRIDGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +74%
  • PM
    PAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    4× · 2023–2026 · $30k · revenue +6%
  • WO
    WINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • SP
    SNAK PAK 4 KIDS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • PY
    PAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • PH
    PAMPA HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Panhandle Behavioral Services Inc
Health
2
Hendrick Home for Children
—
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Texas Battered Women's Center Inc

Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.

Human Services
5
Pampa Senior Citizens Inc

The pampa senior citizens, inc's mission is to help senior citizens of pampa and the surrounding area maintain independence, wellness, and quality of life.

—
6
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
7
Lone Star Circle of Care

Lone star circle of care provides exceptional and accessible patient centered healthcare for our texas neighbors, focusing on the underserved.

Health
8
Amarillo Area Mental Health Consumers Inc

Provide peer-support, referrals & advocacy to mental health consumers.

Human Services
9
Panhandle Crisis Center Inc

To provide adequate quality of protection, shelter and other services to victims of family violence and sexual assault, provide short-term counseling and emotional support, to help empower victims to become and remain self-supporting &…

—
10
Achievement Center of Texas Inc

Provide day care, day habilitation (life skills training), arts exploration, educational assistance and community inclusion for children and young adults with special needs.

Human Services
11
Presbyterian Home for Children

Amarillo children's home provides safe, nurturing, 24-hour care to children from backgrounds of abuse and neglect. our mission is to restore the identity of children so they can realize their great value and be a blessing to others.

Human Services
12
Panhandle Services for Children

Provides mental health services, case management, and placement services and prevention and educaiton programs to youth and families in the oklahoma panhandle.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge; the most unlike its peers is Downtown Women's Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRALEE CRISIS CENTER: $34,000 · OtherTRALEE CRISIS CENTERPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $21,000 · OtherPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTERGRAYCARES LIVING AT HOME INC: $16,500 · OtherGRAYCARES LIVING AT HOME INCFAIRVIEW CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $9,000 · OtherFAIRVIEW CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONPAMPA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $7,800 · OtherPAMPA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTSNAK PAK 4 KIDS: $5,000 · OtherPAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,000 · OtherPAMPA HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherPAMPA OPTIMIST YOUTH CLUB: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $6,000 · OtherGood Samaritan Christian Services Inc: $52,600 · Human ServicesGood Samaritan Christian Services I…THE BRIDGE: $35,500 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGEPAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionPAMPA MEALS …WINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC: $17,500 · Arts & CultureWINDOW ON …DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureDON HARRIN…BRIDGES TO LIFE: $17,300 · Crime & LegalPANHANDLE BREAST HEALTH: $2,500 · HealthTURN CENTER: $2,500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO: $1,000 · Health
Other$114,300Human Services$88,100Food & Nutrition$30,000Arts & Culture$25,500Crime & Legal$17,300Health$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGood Samaritan Christian Services Inc: $52,600 over 7y, 9.4% of budgetTHE BRIDGE: $35,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $30,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetWINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC: $17,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE: $17,300 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetDON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAMPA OPTIMIST YOUTH CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCREATE A BEAT: $3,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURN CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Good Samaritan Christian Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds PAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PAMPA OPTIMIST YOUTH CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CREATE A BEAT ↗
  • Who funds PANHANDLE BREAST HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TURN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundat…M K Brown Foundation …David D & Nona S Payn…Josephine Anderson Ch…Mary E Bivins Foundat…Dr Kent Roberts & Ile…Xcel Energy FoundationNed O and Linda Mille…Gray-Pampa Foundation…Bruckner Family Found…Brumley FoundationKimble Foundation Tru…
Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · M K Brown Foundation Inc · David D & Nona S Payne Foundation Inc · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable · Gray-Pampa Foundation Inc · Bruckner Family Foundation Inc · Brumley Foundation · Kimble Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Inez B & He McCarley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home