Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$59k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
23
Grants FY2025
21
Organizations funded FY2024
24%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$5,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 22
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$914k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 24% of the organizations Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable funded were first-time grantees, receiving 20% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving23$59k17%
FY202421$59k24%
FY202322$61k23%
FY202221$75k14%
FY202116$64k19%
FY202013$53k54%
FY201913$54k31%
FY201814$58k57%
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$149kHousing & Shelter$99kHealth$55kYouth Development$43kEducation$38kCrime & Legal$38kFood & Nutrition$35kArts & Culture$13kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 28 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 21 recipients with no EIN on record ($180k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAnother Chance House: $38,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetDowntown Women's Center Inc: $35,624 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetHigh Plains Children's Home and Family Services Inc: $35,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetOpportunity School Inc: $31,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Bridge: $21,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBuckner Children & Family Services Inc: $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCoalition of Health Services Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMarch of Dimes Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMaverick Boys & Girls Club of Amarillo Inc: $12,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAmarillo Area Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc: $11,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAmarillo Wesley Community Center Inc: $11,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPresbyterian Home for Children: $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHigh Plains Food Bank: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Success Project: $8,500 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetMeals on Wheels: $8,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetThe Parc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWindow on a Wider World Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTyler Street Resource Center Inc: $7,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMission Amarillo: $7,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetTurn Center: $5,420 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hope and Healing Place Inc: $4,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDon Harrington Discovery Center Foundation Inc: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHidden Falls Ranch: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEastridge Mission Center: $4,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHoodoo Art Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPanhandle Breast Health: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX54.9× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Kimble Foundation Trust · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Mary E Bivins Foundation · William & Louise Mullins Foundation · Cj and Syble Fowlston Charitable Trust · Mays Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Amarillo Business Foundation · The Don & Sybil Harrington Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable with peer funders

About Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable

How much does Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable give?
Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable reported 23 grants totaling $58,850 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 22 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (28%), Housing & Shelter (18%), Health (10%).
Who are Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Another Chance House ($38k), Downtown Women's Center Inc ($36k), High Plains Children's Home and Family Services Inc ($35k).
Does Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 24% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amarillo Area Foundation Inc, Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation, Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust.
Where is Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable based?
Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ned O and Linda Miller’s filings →

More from the funding graph