· Private foundation
Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS | $7,500 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN CHRISTIAN SERVICES | $7,000 |
| TRALEE CRISIS CENTER | $3,500 |
| PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER | $3,000 |
| DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER | $3,000 |
| PANHANDLE BREAST HEALTH | $2,500 |
| BRIDGES TO LIFE | $2,500 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–26, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2026, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BRIDGE9× · 2017–2025 · $36k · revenue +74%
- PMPAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS INC4× · 2023–2026 · $30k · revenue +6%
- WOWINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC5× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- PYPAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INCone grant, 2025 · $5k · revenue 0%
- SPSNAK PAK 4 KIDSone grant, 2024 · $5k
- POPAMPA OPTIMIST YOUTH CLUBgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.
The pampa senior citizens, inc's mission is to help senior citizens of pampa and the surrounding area maintain independence, wellness, and quality of life.
When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…
Lone star circle of care provides exceptional and accessible patient centered healthcare for our texas neighbors, focusing on the underserved.
Provide peer-support, referrals & advocacy to mental health consumers.
To provide adequate quality of protection, shelter and other services to victims of family violence and sexual assault, provide short-term counseling and emotional support, to help empower victims to become and remain self-supporting &…
Provide day care, day habilitation (life skills training), arts exploration, educational assistance and community inclusion for children and young adults with special needs.
Amarillo children's home provides safe, nurturing, 24-hour care to children from backgrounds of abuse and neglect. our mission is to restore the identity of children so they can realize their great value and be a blessing to others.
Provides mental health services, case management, and placement services and prevention and educaiton programs to youth and families in the oklahoma panhandle.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge and the most unlike its peers is Downtown Women's Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Good Samaritan Christian Services Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds PAMPA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds WINDOW ON A WIDER WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
- Who funds DON HARRINGTON DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PAMPA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PAMPA OPTIMIST YOUTH CLUB ↗
- Who funds CREATE A BEAT ↗
- Who funds PANHANDLE BREAST HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TURN CENTER ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF AMARILLO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · M K Brown Foundation Inc · David D & Nona S Payne Foundation Inc · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ned O and Linda Miller Charitable · Gray-Pampa Foundation Inc · Bruckner Family Foundation Inc · Brumley Foundation · Kimble Foundation Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust?
Find your warmest path to Inez B & He McCarley Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.