Skip to content

· Private foundation

Incline Equity Partners Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$87k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$130kEducation$80kYouth Development$70kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$7kInternational$5k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $79k
$14,761
Median grant
2
States reached
$618
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEEL CITY SQUASH INC$25,000
CHALLENGE PROGRAM INC$20,000
THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$19,371
THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$14,761
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC$2,500
BROTHERS BROTHER FOUNDATION$2,500
CRISIS CENTER NORTH INCORPORATION$1,400
INSPIRED HEARTS AND HANDS INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%INSPIRED HEARTS AND HANDS INC: $1k → 9%CRISIS CENTER NORTH INCORPORATION: $3k → 11%CRISIS CENTER NORTH INCORPORATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Incline Equity Partners Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Incline Equity Partners Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$283k · 5 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$283k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+46%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    STEEL CITY SQUASH INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $130k · revenue +235%
  • SF
    STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP
    3× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +78%
  • TC
    THE CHALLENGE PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • NY
    NEW YORK CARES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -11%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
2
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
3
Partners in Child Development Inc

To provide educational and therapeutic services, at a professional level, for infants, toddlers and preschool children up to 12 years and their families through supporting the family unit and working with each child to develop his or her…

Human Services
4
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
5
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
8
Bear Creek Community Charter School

Our mission is to embrace a diverse student body and student success through an innovative an innovative curriculum, the cultivation of environmental stewardship, and accountability.

Education
9
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Indiana Inc

The big brothers big sisters mission is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Youth Development
10
Compass Charter School

Compass charter school is a safe and nurturing educational environment that honors the individuality of each learner. by engaging in a process of inquiry, our graduates will be equipped with the necessary skills to lead fulfilling personal…

Education
11
Challenge Success

Challenge Success partners with schools, families, and communities to embrace a broad definition of success and implement research-based strategies that promote student well-being and engagement with learning.

Education
12
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc; the most unlike its peers is Inspired Hearts and Hands Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEEL CITY SQUASH INC: $130,000 · EducationSTEEL CITY SQUASH INCSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $79,564 · EducationSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIPTHE CHALLENGE PROGRAM INC: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHALLENGE PROGRAM INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WE…NEW YORK CARES INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $5,000 · InternationalCRISIS CENTER NORTH INC: $3,900 · Human ServicesInspired Hearts and Hands Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC: $2,500 · Other
Education$209,564Youth Development$70,000Philanthropy$10,000International$5,000Human Services$4,900Other$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTEEL CITY SQUASH INC: $130,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $79,564 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHALLENGE PROGRAM INC: $65,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROTHER'S BROTHER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS CENTER NORTH INC: $3,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SAN DIEGO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInspired Hearts and Hands Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard King Mellon FoundationPA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Incline Equity Partners Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Incline Equity Partners Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Incline Equity Partners Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Incline Equity Partners Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Incline Equity Partners’ filings →

    More from the funding graph