Skip to content

· Private foundation

In His Name Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$166k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$455kReligion$340kHealth$100kInternational$88kCivil Rights$59kEducation$43kHuman Services$17kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$12,050
Median grant
2
States reached
$345k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PB&J FOODS INC$110,000
OPERATION MOBILIZATION$25,000
HIGHER ROCK FOUNDATION$12,510
Nkhoma Hospital$12,050
CAREPOSSIBLE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$215
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 90% of grant dollars ($1.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 10% that went abroad ($113k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ACRES OF LOVE: $3k → 10%ACRES OF LOVE: $3k → 10%ACRES OF LOVE: $3k → 10%ACRES OF LOVE: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
SC
OK
GA

Beyond the US: 10% of all-years giving ($113k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Malawi$98k · 8 grants
Zambia$15k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$927k · 14 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
21

Total granted

$927k
$334k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-12%
+25%

Still filing today

29%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PB&J Foods Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $565k · revenue -24% · 60% of their budget
  • NH
    Nkhoma Hospital
    4× · 2020–2025 · $87k
  • OM
    OPERATION MOBILIZATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $84k

Funded once

  • WB
    Walk By Faith Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -98% · 32% of their budget
  • MA
    Mary Ann Van Fossan
    one grant, 2019 · $49k
  • MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
2
Transform Ministries
—
3
Follow Him Media Inc
Religion
4
Explore God Network
—
5
Relationship With Jesus Inc
Religion
6
The Rock Ministries

To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations

Human Services
7
Upreach Ministry International Inc
—
8
Practical Christianity Foundation
Religion
9
Crosswater Ministries
Religion
10
Cry from the Wilderness Ministries
Religion
11
Global Mission

To bring the gospel of jesus christ to those who have never heard it and take care of orphans

Religion
12
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Faithwalk Leadership; the most unlike its peers is Higher Rock Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PB&J Foods Inc: $565,148 · InternationalPB&J Foods IncNkhoma Hospital: $86,900 · OtherNkhoma HospitalOPERATION MOBILIZATION: $83,505 · OtherOPERATION MOBILIZATIONTHE FREEDOM CHALLENGE: $68,275 · OtherTHE FREEDOM CHALLENGEMary Ann Van Fossan: $48,800 · OtherMary Ann Van FossanY MALAWI: $20,000 · OtherSAN CLEMENTE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherTHE CHIEFS MINISTRY: $17,045 · Other+17 more: $112,694 · Other+17 moreWalk By Faith Foundation: $150,000 · PhilanthropyWalk By Faith …HIGHER ROCK FOUNDATION: $12,510 · PhilanthropyHIGHER ROCK FO…MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 · HealthTrinity Ranch Ministries Inc: $8,250 · HealthCAREPOSSIBLE INC: $5,000 · HealthAIRO: $17,500 · ReligionCrossTalk Global: $7,725 · ReligionREACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · Religion+2 more: $1,250 · ReligionACRES OF LOVE: $10,500 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR FAITHWALK LEADERSHIP: $10,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $250 · Public BenefitBBL Ministries Inc: $5,000 · Employment
International$565,148Other$457,219Philanthropy$162,510Health$38,250Religion$31,475Human Services$10,500Public Benefit$10,250Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPB&J Foods Inc: $565,148 over 7y, 60% of budgetWalk By Faith Foundation: $150,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAIRO: $17,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHIGHER ROCK FOUNDATION: $12,510 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetACRES OF LOVE: $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAITHWALK LEADERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTrinity Ranch Ministries Inc: $8,250 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCrossTalk Global: $7,725 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetREACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBBL Ministries Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCAREPOSSIBLE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFor The Global Glory of God: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDANCE 4 JOY MINISTRIES: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PB&J Foods Inc ↗
  • Who funds Walk By Faith Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AIRO ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER ROCK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACRES OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAITHWALK LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Trinity Ranch Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds CrossTalk Global ↗
  • Who funds REACHING SOULS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BBL Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAREPOSSIBLE INC ↗
  • Who funds For The Global Glory of God ↗
  • Who funds DANCE 4 JOY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA14.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Servant Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization In His Name Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from In His Name Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to In His Name Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to In His Name Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on In His Name’s filings →

    More from the funding graph