Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

In a Perfect World

We empower young people with the tools, skills, and opportunities they need to succeed and thrive.

$35k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

International$150kYouth Development$31kArts & Culture$25kEducation$22kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$400Civil Rights$370Other$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$22,244
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOOL THE WORLD$22,244
FORMIDABLE JOY$12,794
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $400) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRUE SIOUX HOPE: $400 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
CT
CA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 36% of In a Perfect World’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 8% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 3% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

In a Perfect Worldlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$73k · 4 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
22

Total granted

$73k
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+37%

Still filing today

100%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22
InternationalPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SCHOOL THE WORLD INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $52k · revenue +76%
  • D
    DONORSCHOOSEORG
    2× · 2020–2021 · $19k · revenue +1%
  • LF
    LADYLIKE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • BUILDON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $67k · revenue +39%
  • HK
    HORTON'S KIDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +66%
  • FA
    FREE ARTS MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2017 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Kids in Need Foundation

We believe every child in america should have equal opportunity and resources to engage in a quality education. by partnering with teachers and students in under-resourced schools, we provide the support needed to create equitable learning…

Education
3
National Office the Duke of Edinburgh's International Award Usa

The duke of edinburgh's international award use transforms individuals, communities,and societies around the world, helping young people exceed expectations. it allows their achievements to be recognized consistently worldwide through a…

Youth Development
4
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
5
Childhood Education International

To promote innovative solutions to education challenges and inspire action that creates positive, sustainable futures for children and youth worldwide

6
World Vision Inc

World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…

International
7
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
8
Achieve Now

Achieve now is a philadelphia-based social justice organization that sees literacy as a mechanism to effect social change. our mission is to provide k-2 school children in greater philadelphia with high-quality, culturally competent…

Education
9
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
10
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Formidable Joy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HORTON'S KIDS INC — $25,000 · OtherHORTON'S KIDS INCFREE ARTS MINNESOTA — $20,059 · OtherFREE ARTS MINNESOTAPROJECT HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $15,000 · OtherPROJECT HOPE INTERNATIONALBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA — $5,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICAPAINTS INSITUTE LLC — $5,000 · OtherPAINTS INSITUTE LLC+6 more — $4,398 · Other+6 moreBUILDON INC — $67,000 · InternationalBUILDON INC+4 more — $3,028 · InternationalSCHOOL THE WORLD INC — $51,670 · PhilanthropySCHOOL THE WORLD INCFORMIDABLE JOY — $12,794 · PhilanthropyFORMIDABLE JOY+3 more — $720 · PhilanthropyDONORSCHOOSEORG — $18,966 · EducationDONORSCHOO…ADOPT-A-CLASSROOM INC — $1,000 · EducationBOOKS BETWEEN KIDS INC — $1,000 · EducationLADYLIKE FOUNDATION — $1,700 · Food & NutritionINDIGENOUS IMPACT FUND — $400 · Human ServicesDARE AMERICA — $50 · Health
Other$74,457International$70,028Philanthropy$65,184Education$20,966Food & Nutrition$1,700Human Services$400Health$50

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBUILDON INC — $67,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSCHOOL THE WORLD INC — $51,670 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHORTON'S KIDS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $18,966 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFORMIDABLE JOY — $12,794 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetRACE TO ERASE MS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKids for Peace — $1,930 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLADYLIKE FOUNDATION — $1,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetADOPT-A-CLASSROOM INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS BETWEEN KIDS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $788 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINDIGENOUS IMPACT FUND — $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ETHNIC UNDERSTANDING — $370 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJazz Foundation of America Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDARE AMERICA — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization In a Perfect World funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to In a Perfect World?

Find your warmest path to In a Perfect World through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph