Skip to content

California · Public charity

In a Perfect World

We empower young people with the tools, skills, and opportunities they need to succeed and thrive. Iapw programs improve academic outcomes, develop critical life skills, and unlock the potential of youth to lead transformational change.

$35k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
Organizations funded FY2022
50%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$22,244
Largest grant, FY2022
$22,244
Organizations funded a year
2 to 20
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
2
Total assets, FY2022
$2.8M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 50% of the organizations In a Perfect World funded were first-time grantees, receiving 37% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
PhilanthropyEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20222$35k50%
FY20214$18k50%
FY20206$35k67%
FY201720$145kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

International$150kYouth Development$31kArts & Culture$25kEducation$22kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$2kHuman Services$400Civil Rights$370Other$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
CT
CA
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Buildon Inc$67,00010%
School the World Inc$51,67022%
Horton's Kids Inc$25,00011%
Free Arts Minnesota$20,0591n/a
Donorschooseorg$18,96620%
Formidable Joy$12,79416%
Race to Erase Ms$2,00010%
Kids for Peace$1,93011%
Ladylike Foundation$1,70020%
Friends of the Grantsburg Library Inc$1,1001n/a
Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of In a Perfect World by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Buildon Inc$67,00010%
School the World Inc$51,67022%
Horton's Kids Inc$25,00011%
Free Arts Minnesota$20,0591n/a
Donorschooseorg$18,96620%
Formidable Joy$12,79416%
Race to Erase Ms$2,00010%
Kids for Peace$1,93011%
Ladylike Foundation$1,70020%
Friends of the Grantsburg Library Inc$1,1001n/a
Adopt-A-Classroom Inc$1,00010%
Books Between Kids Inc$1,00010%
Save The Children Federation Inc$78830%
Indigenous Impact Fund$40010%
Foundation for Ethnic Understanding$37010%
Jazz Foundation of America Inc$25010%
Amnesty International of the USA Inc$25010%
Points of Light Foundation$10010%
United States Fund for Unicef$6010%
Dare America$5010%

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($26k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget In a Perfect World supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBuildon Inc: $67,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSchool the World Inc: $51,670 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHorton's Kids Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDonorschooseorg: $18,966 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFormidable Joy: $12,794 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetRace to Erase Ms: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKids for Peace: $1,930 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLadylike Foundation: $1,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAdopt-A-Classroom Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBooks Between Kids Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $788 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIndigenous Impact Fund: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Ethnic Understanding: $370 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJazz Foundation of America Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmnesty International of the USA Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPoints of Light Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Fund for Unicef: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDare America: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare In a Perfect World with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to In a Perfect World?

Find your warmest path to In a Perfect World through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About In a Perfect World

How much does In a Perfect World give?
In a Perfect World reported 2 grants totaling $35,038 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 20 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does In a Perfect World fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are International (64%), Youth Development (13%), Arts & Culture (11%).
Who are In a Perfect World's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Buildon Inc ($67k), School the World Inc ($52k), Horton's Kids Inc ($25k).
Does In a Perfect World fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as In a Perfect World?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Blackbaud Giving Fund, Paypal Charitable Giving Fund, Jpmorgan Chase Foundation.
Where is In a Perfect World based?
In a Perfect World is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on In a Perfect World’s filings →

More from the funding graph