Skip to content

Arizona · Public charity

Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley

In partnership with the pga tour, to raise funds through its operation of a pga tour- sanctioned golf tournament. Net proceeds of the tournament are distributed to various charities.

$285k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2024
7
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$60,000
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$1.0M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$100kHuman Services$90kYouth Development$75kPhilanthropy$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kAnimals$40kPublic Benefit$20kRecreation & Sports$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees
All grantees of Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Boys Club of Napa Inc Boys & Girls Club of Napa Valley$60,00011%
Queen of the Valley Medical Center Foundation$50,00020%
Ole Health Foundation$50,00011%
The Dragon Club$50,0002n/a
Jameson Animal Rescue Ranch$40,00021%
News$40,00021%
Keller Restaurant Relief Fund$30,000290%
The Jim and Tabitha Furyk Foundation$20,00010%
Weir Foundation$20,0001n/a
Cameron Champ Foundation$15,00012%
The Napa Communities Firewise Foundation$15,00010%
Ncga Foundation$10,00010%
Silverado Junior Golf Organization Inc$10,000116%

Where it is load-bearing

Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 11 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys Club of Napa Inc Boys & Girls Club of Napa Valley: $60,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetQueen of the Valley Medical Center Foundation: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOle Health Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJameson Animal Rescue Ranch: $40,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNews: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKeller Restaurant Relief Fund: $30,000 over 2y, 90% of budgetThe Jim and Tabitha Furyk Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCameron Champ Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe Napa Communities Firewise Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNcga Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSilverado Junior Golf Organization Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 16% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McNabb FoundationDE17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McNabb Foundation · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Pga Tour Inc · Robert Lee Hudson Foundation · Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund · Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley?

Find your warmest path to Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley

How much does Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley give?
Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley reported 12 grants totaling $285,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (22%), Human Services (20%), Youth Development (17%).
Who are Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Boys Club of Napa Inc Boys & Girls Club of Napa Valley ($60k), Queen of the Valley Medical Center Foundation ($50k), Ole Health Foundation ($50k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include McNabb Foundation, Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation, Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation.
Where is Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley based?
Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Impact Through Golf Foundation Napa Valley’s filings →

More from the funding graph