Skip to content
Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Vision statement: icadv envisions a statewide community committed to exposing the root causes of domestic abuse and ensuring safety for families by supporting the voices of all survivors.mission statement: icadv builds networks of support for and with survivors, and advances statewide policies and practices that transform societal…

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
56
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$425k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$107MHuman Services$14MHealth$738kHousing & Shelter$515kArts & Culture$126kEducation$107kCommunity Improvement$54k
02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k36 grants · $5.4M
  • $250k+16 grants · $5.1M
$186,653
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS$424,529
FAMILY RESCUE$404,376
SOJOURN SHELTER & SERVICES INC$380,286
HARBOR HOUSE$330,140
CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF ABUSE$328,101
FAMILY RESOURCES INC$327,641
LIFE SPAN$321,413
REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES$319,277
FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE$316,743
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES$311,913
ANEW$302,707
CRISIS CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBURBIA$293,022
CAIRO WOMEN'S SHELTER INC$286,552
COURAGE CONNECTION$267,839
GUARDIAN ANGEL COMMUNITY SERVICES$260,124
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $50.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $606k → 7%MUTUAL GROUND INC: $475k → 8%HOPE OF OGLE COUNTY: $376k → 9%CRISIS CENTER FOUNDATION: $368k → 12%SAFE PASSAGE: $655k → 13%KANKAKEE CO COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $389k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $639k → 14%STOPPING WOMAN ABUSE NOW: $399k → 15%MUTUAL GROUND INC: $451k → 8%HOPE OF OGLE COUNTY: $360k → 9%SAFE PASSAGE: $647k → 13%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $623k → 14%STOPPING WOMAN ABUSE NOW: $374k → 15%MUTUAL GROUND INC: $411k → 8%SAFE PASSAGE: $623k → 13%KANKAKEE CO COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $378k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $462k → 14%STOPPING WOMAN ABUSE NOW: $373k → 15%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $426k → 7%MUTUAL GROUND INC: $378k → 8%SAFE PASSAGE: $565k → 13%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $370k → 14%STOPPING WOMAN ABUSE NOW: $364k → 15%FAMILY SHELTER SERVICE: $406k → 7%MUTUAL GROUND INC: $370k → 8%SAFE PASSAGE: $535k → 13%CRISIS CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBURBIA: $553k → 14%CRISIS CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBURBIA: $499k → 14%CRISIS CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBURBIA: $497k → 14%CRISIS CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBURBIA: $403k → 14%CRISIS CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBURBIA: $403k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $511k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $472k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $408k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $622k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $593k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $513k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $503k → 14%SARAH'S INN: $474k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $363k → 14%MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $360k → 14%FAMILY RESCUE: $999k → 14%FAMILY RESCUE: $953k → 14%FAMILY RESCUE: $953k → 14%FAMILY RESCUE: $940k → 14%FAMILY RESCUE: $861k → 14%FAMILY RESCUE: $404k → 14%FAMILY RESCUE: $400k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$122M · 62 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +115% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

62 repeat relationships: 55 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
4

Total granted

$122M
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
-12%

Still filing today

95%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    FAMILY RESCUE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +171%
  • SS
    SOJOURN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +257% · 49% of their budget
  • CC
    COURAGE CONNECTION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +40% · 37% of their budget

Funded once

  • PC
    PILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $252k · revenue +93%
  • PA
    PEOPLE AGAINST VIOLENT ENVIRONMENTS
    one grant, 2017 · $37k
  • PC
    PHOENIX CRISIS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
2
Crisis Care Line

Domestic violence victim services

—
3
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
4
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
5
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
6
Domestic Abusesexual Assault Services Inc

To provide free, confidential, and empowering services to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking while raising awareness and prevention efforts throughout our communities.

Human Services
7
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
8
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
9
Domestic Violence Intervention Services

See schedule oadvancing physical and emotional safety by reducing the impact and occurrence of sexual and domestic violence, human trafficking and stalking through inclusive intervention and prevention services for children, youth, and…

Human Services
10
Crisis Intervention & Advocacy Center

Crisis intervention & advocacy center is an advocacy program designed to respond to victims of domestic abuse, sexual assualt, stalking, dating violence, and homelessness in adair, adams, clarke, dallas, decatur, guthrie, madison,…

Human Services
11
Community Beyond Violence

CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.

—
12
Domestic Violence Shelter and Services Inc

We will work toward the elimination of domestic violence and provide emergency and support services for survivors of domestic violence.For over 38 years, Domestic Violence Shelter and Services, Inc. (DVSS) has advanced its work to prevent…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Crisis Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital and Care Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/64
Grantees still filing
56/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY RESCUE INC: $5,681,630 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESCUE INCSAFE PASSAGE INC: $3,740,416 · Human ServicesSAFE PASSAGE INCSARAH'S INN: $3,287,925 · Human ServicesSARAH'S INNCrisis Center for South Suburbia: $3,016,754 · Human ServicesCrisis Center for South SuburbiaMetropolitan Family Services: $2,973,599 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Family ServicesVIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2,909,442 · Human ServicesBETWEEN FRIENDS: $2,620,305 · Human ServicesMUTUAL GROUND INC: $2,466,209 · Human ServicesStopping Woman Abuse Now (SWAN): $2,322,157 · Human ServicesFamily Shelter Service Inc: $2,221,765 · Human ServicesCRISIS CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,010,703 · Human ServicesHOPE OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS NFP: $1,891,194 · Human Services+19 more: $19,642,001 · Human Services+19 moreSOJOURN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $4,574,659 · OtherSOJOURN SHELTER AND SERVICES INCTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $3,886,262 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSELAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $3,658,199 · OtherLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTERANEW BUILDING BEYOND VIOLENCE AND ABUSE: $3,654,843 · OtherANEW BUILDING BEYOND VIOLENCE AND ABUSEDOVE INC: $3,448,806 · OtherDOVE INCGUARDIAN ANGEL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3,439,519 · OtherGUARDIAN ANGEL COMMUNITY SERVICESCairo Women's Shelter Inc: $3,248,745 · OtherCairo Women's Shelter IncYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY: $3,099,825 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE…YWCA EvanstonNorth Shore: $2,920,438 · OtherYWCA EvanstonNorth ShorePILLARS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2,788,359 · OtherPILLARS COMMUNITY SERVICESSURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC: $2,595,340 · OtherSURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INCFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $2,014,549 · Other+10 more: $6,774,983 · Other+10 moreCOURAGE CONNECTION: $3,903,850 · Housing & ShelterWINGS PROGRAM INC: $2,374,458 · Housing & ShelterAPNA GHAR INC: $2,068,263 · Housing & ShelterFREEDOM HOUSE INC: $1,090,797 · Housing & ShelterREMEDIES RENEWING LIVES: $3,215,675 · HealthCROSSPOINT: $1,991,878 · HealthSCHWAB REHABILITATION HOSPITAL AND CARE NETWORK: $336,483 · HealthPILLARS COMMUNITY HEALTH: $252,119 · Health+1 more: $186,340 · HealthLIFE-SPAN: $3,699,815 · Crime & LegalRiverview Center Inc: $1,361,538 · EducationWESTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL COUNCIL - COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $994,480 · EducationBLUE TOWER SOLUTIONS INC: $72,312 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,353 · Philanthropy
Human Services$54,784,100Other$46,104,527Housing & Shelter$9,437,368Health$5,982,495Crime & Legal$3,699,815Education$2,356,018Philanthropy$74,665

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY RESCUE INC: $5,681,630 over 9y, 24% of budgetSOJOURN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC: $4,574,659 over 9y, 49% of budgetCOURAGE CONNECTION: $3,903,850 over 9y, 37% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $3,886,262 over 9y, 10% of budgetSAFE PASSAGE INC: $3,740,416 over 9y, 23% of budgetLIFE-SPAN: $3,699,815 over 9y, 17% of budgetLAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER: $3,658,199 over 9y, 14% of budgetANEW BUILDING BEYOND VIOLENCE AND ABUSE: $3,654,843 over 9y, 29% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGEL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $3,439,519 over 9y, 8.9% of budgetSARAH'S INN: $3,287,925 over 9y, 21% of budgetCairo Women's Shelter Inc: $3,248,745 over 9y, 45% of budgetREMEDIES RENEWING LIVES: $3,215,675 over 9y, 11% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY: $3,099,825 over 9y, 26% of budgetCrisis Center for South Suburbia: $3,016,754 over 9y, 12% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services: $2,973,599 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetYWCA EvanstonNorth Shore: $2,920,438 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetVIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS: $2,909,442 over 9y, 21% of budgetPILLARS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2,788,359 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetBETWEEN FRIENDS: $2,620,305 over 9y, 35% of budgetSURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC: $2,595,340 over 9y, 21% of budgetMUTUAL GROUND INC: $2,466,209 over 9y, 17% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $2,374,458 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetStopping Woman Abuse Now (SWAN): $2,322,157 over 9y, 15% of budgetFamily Shelter Service Inc: $2,221,765 over 6y, 20% of budgetAPNA GHAR INC: $2,068,263 over 9y, 17% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCES INC: $2,014,549 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetCRISIS CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,010,703 over 9y, 37% of budgetCROSSPOINT: $1,991,878 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetHOPE OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS NFP: $1,891,194 over 9y, 28% of budgetARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $1,811,946 over 9y, 17% of budgetHOPE OF OGLE COUNTY: $1,748,084 over 9y, 33% of budgetOASIS WOMENS CENTER: $1,690,020 over 9y, 26% of budgetCOMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC: $1,689,889 over 9y, 10% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN: $1,637,248 over 9y, 9.8% of budgetMUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION: $1,607,591 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetTurning Point Inc: $1,562,275 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetMID CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $1,465,362 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetRiverview Center Inc: $1,361,538 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetNEOPOLITAN LIGHTHOUSE: $1,282,820 over 9y, 19% of budgetKAN-WIN: $1,201,474 over 9y, 14% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services DuPage: $1,200,644 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE INC: $1,090,797 over 9y, 8.7% of budgetQUINCY AREA NETWORK AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $1,064,585 over 9y, 14% of budgetFulton-Mason Crisis Service: $1,000,165 over 9y, 24% of budgetWESTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL COUNCIL - COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $994,480 over 9y, 3.2% of budgetSAFE HARBOR FAMILY CRISIS CENTER LTD: $985,008 over 9y, 28% of budgetVOICES OF STEPHENSON COUNTY: $915,022 over 9y, 15% of budgetMERCER COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $863,028 over 9y, 29% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURN SHELTER AND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COURAGE CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PASSAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE-SPAN ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ANEW BUILDING BEYOND VIOLENCE AND ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIAN ANGEL COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S INN ↗
  • Who funds Cairo Women's Shelter Inc ↗
  • Who funds REMEDIES RENEWING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE SAUK VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Center for South Suburbia ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds YWCA EvanstonNorth Shore ↗
  • Who funds VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER OF SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds PILLARS COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BETWEEN FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds SURVIVOR EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MUTUAL GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Stopping Woman Abuse Now (SWAN) ↗
  • Who funds Family Shelter Service Inc ↗
  • Who funds APNA GHAR INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPOINT ↗
  • Who funds HOPE OF EAST CENTRAL ILLINOIS NFP ↗
  • Who funds ARAB AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HOPE OF OGLE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OASIS WOMENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR ABUSED WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION ↗
  • Who funds Turning Point Inc ↗
  • Who funds MID CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Riverview Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEOPOLITAN LIGHTHOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Network Advocatin…United Way of Metropo…Illinois Coalition Ag…Mary Kay Ash Foundati…Chicago Foundation fo…Arie and Ida Crown Me…Michael Reese Health …Alphawood FoundationBlowitz-Ridgeway Foun…The Chicago Community…All Chicago Making Ho…Polk Bros Foundation …
The Network Advocating Against Domestic ViolenceIL47.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Chicago Foundation for Women · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Michael Reese Health Trust · Alphawood Foundation · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · All Chicago Making Homelessness History · Polk Bros Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home