Skip to content
Igm Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Igm Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$125kAnimals$91kHealth$62kFood & Nutrition$22kHuman Services$18kPublic Benefit$10kEducation$5kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$31k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES$5,000
MAKE A WISH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $22k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $20k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $15k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $15k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $15k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $14k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $11k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $2k → 12%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $2k → 12%ALPHA HOUSE: $1k → 12%DAYSTAR LIFE CENTER: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$295k · 23 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
22

Total granted

$295k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+3%

Still filing today

65%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +131%
  • TK
    The Kind Mouse Productions Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +24%
  • SL
    Seal Legacy Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF NATURE COAST
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +125%
  • HH
    HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
3
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
4
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
5
Humane Society of Greater Miami-Dade for Pocta Aap

Matching furry friends with their purr-fect homes & offering affordable spay/neuter.

Animals
6
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
7
Tampa Bay Strays Inc

Animal rescue and adoption facilitator to permanent homes.

Animals
8
Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

To prevent the suffering and death of companion animals and to enrich the human-animal bond by providing excellent, accessible, and affordable spay/neuter and veterinary care.

Animals
9
Gulf Coast Humane Society Inc

Our mission at gulf coast humane society is to care for companion pets in need by offering safe refuge, providing medical care and facilitating adoptions.

Animals
10
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Wake County Inc

Located in raleigh, nc, the spca of wake county works in over half the state of north carolina through collaborative partnerships that save pets and help people. significant activities include: decreasing the number of animals entering…

Animals
11
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
12
Houston Pets Alive

Houston Pets Alive!s (HPA!) mission is to save the lives of at-risk companion cats and dogs and find them loving homes.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Love Thy Neighbor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $116,500 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC+4 more: $8,165 · Human Services+4 moreMOFFITT CANCER CENTER: $38,600 · OtherMOFFITT CANCER CENTERMAKE A WISH: $12,000 · OtherMAKE A WISHHUMANE SOCIETY: $10,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETYHUMANE SOCIETY OF NATURE COAST: $10,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF NATURE COASTPET PAL ANIMAL SHELTER: $8,000 · OtherPET PAL ANIMAL SHELTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 · OtherRINGLING COLLEGE: $4,500 · Other+13 more: $20,000 · Other+13 moreSAVE OUR STRAYS INC: $25,000 · AnimalsSAVE OUR STRAYS INCTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,200 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY…SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS TAMPA BAY FLORIDA INC: $7,000 · AnimalsSOCIETY FOR THE PREV…Humane World for Animals Inc: $6,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Ani…HOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIE…Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $3,500 · AnimalsHumane Society of Ta…+5 more: $8,000 · Animals+5 moreST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,500 · HealthTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · HealthHOPE HEALTH AND SUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthLOVE THY NEIGHBOR: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthThe Kind Mouse Productions Inc: $15,000 · Community ImprovementSeal Legacy Foundation Inc: $8,500 · Public BenefitFeeding America: $5,500 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$124,665Other$108,600Animals$62,700Health$17,000Community Improvement$15,000Public Benefit$8,500Food & Nutrition$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $116,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE OUR STRAYS INC: $25,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetThe Kind Mouse Productions Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSeal Legacy Foundation Inc: $8,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $8,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS TAMPA BAY FLORIDA INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASOLO THEATRE INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSociety of St Vincent De Paul Council of Upper Pinellas County: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEASIDE SEABIRD SANCTUARY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPCA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PINELLAS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA HOUSE OF PINELLAS COUNTY INC: $1,165 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Duke Energy FoundationPinellas Community Fo…Westphal Family Found…Francis and Gertrude …J Crayton Pruitt Foun…Catalina Marketing Ch…Publix Super Markets …The Bank of America C…Baird Foundation IncEnterprise Holdings F…The Pfizer Foundation…
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Westphal Family Foundation Inc · Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation · J Crayton Pruitt Foundation Inc · Catalina Marketing Charitable Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Igm Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Igm Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Alpha House of Pinellas County Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Spca Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Seaside Seabird Sanctuary: 0% of income from government
  • The Kind Mouse Productions Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Igm’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home