Skip to content
If Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

If Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.6MCivil Rights$1.4MHealth$713kPublic Benefit$695kHuman Services$655kCommunity Improvement$653kCrime & Legal$476kYouth Development$470kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $835k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $280k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$80,000
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
FESTIVAL CENTER$25,000
GATEWAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$25,000
MOTHERS OUTREACH NETWORK INC$25,000
LEADERSHIP GREATER WASHINGTON$25,000
CRITICAL EXPOSURE$20,000
HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFIT DEVELOPERS$20,000
CONCERNED CITIZENS NETWORK OF ALEXANDRIA$20,000
FESTIVAL CENTER$20,000
PROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND$20,000
ST LUKE LEGACY CENTER FOUNDATION INC$20,000
LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $770k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER: $20k → 17%MOTHER'S OUTREACH NETWORK INC: $25k → 14%TAKE RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 16%MOTHERS OUTREACH NETWORK INC: $25k → 14%MOTHER'S OUTREACH NETWORK INC: $20k → 14%MOTHER'S OUTREACH NETWORK INC: $10k → 14%VIRGINIA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT: $20k → 6%VIRGINIA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $20k → 6%VIRGINIA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $15k → 6%VIRGINIA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $15k → 6%WELL COLLECTIVE THE: $20k → 22%EL PODER DE SER MUJER: $5k → 8%COMMUNITY MINISTRY OF PRINCE GEORGES CO: $20k → 11%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $25k → 14%CENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $20k → 6%COMMUNITY MINISTRY OF PRINCE GEORGE'S CO INC: $15k → 11%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $25k → 14%COMMUNITY MINISTRY OF PRINCE GEORGE'S CO INC: $15k → 11%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $25k → 14%NORTHERN VIRGINIA FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 6%THE HIVE: $20k → 22%THE HIVE: $20k → 22%COMMUNITY MINISTRY OF PRINCE GEORGE'S CO INC: $15k → 11%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $25k → 14%PRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE: $20k → 11%ASIAN AMERICAN LEAD: $20k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION: $25k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION: $25k → 14%INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION: $20k → 14%HIPS: $15k → 14%EVERYONE HOME DC: $15k → 14%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ADVOCACY: $15k → 14%FESTIVAL CENTER: $25k → 14%FESTIVAL CENTER: $20k → 14%FESTIVAL CENTER: $20k → 14%LIFE ASSET: $15k → 14%ASIAN AMERICAN LEAD: $15k → 14%ASIAN AMERICAN LEAD: $5k → 14%ASIAN AMERICAN LEAD: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 75 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +51% for those funded once.

75 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
68

Total granted

$5.4M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+51%

Still filing today

76%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $193k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthCivil RightsCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    IMPACT SILVER SPRING
    6× · 2017–2022 · $195k · revenue +14%
  • VO
    VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $180k · revenue +4%
  • BF
    BREAD FOR THE CITY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • WA
    WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue +67%
  • PF
    Pillars Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +610%
  • TF
    TIDES FOUNDATIONCENTER FOR WORKING FAMILIES FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
2
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
3
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
4
Fair Chance

Strengthen sustainability of community based non-profits to benefit those experiencing poverty.

Human Services
5
Dc Action for Children Today Dc Act

We're making the District of Columbia a place where all kids grow up safe, resilient, powerful and heard. DC Action uses research, data, and a racial equity lens to break down barriers that stand in the way of all kids reaching their full…

Human Services
6
Coalition for Dc Representation in Congress Education Fund

Founded in 1998, dc vote is a national citizen engagement and advocacy organization dedicated to strengthening democracy and securing equality for all in the district of columbia.

Education
7
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
8
Greater Greater Washington Commons

Greater Greater Washington Commons (GGWash Commons) aims to build civic capacity through media, education, and engagement, to advance racial, economic, and environmental justice in land use, transportation, and housing throughout Greater…

Community Improvement
9
Dc Policy Center

The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…

Public Benefit
10
Washington Community Alliance

Washington Community Alliance WCA is a statewide network of over 70 organizations working to advance multiracial social democracy by coordinating values aligned civic engagement

Civil Rights
11
Community Development Network of Maryland Inc

To promote, strengthen, and advocate for the community development sector throughout Marylands urban, suburban, and rural communities.

Community Improvement
12
Virginia Coalition for Progressive Values

To establish an effective, long-term and resilient political infrastructure that advocates for and delivers public policy victories which reflect the values held in common by our members.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is National Coalition of 100 Black Women. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 156 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
47
Early backer (in before they grew)
108/112
Grantees still filing
88/112
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CASA INC: $140,000 · OtherLEADERSHIP MONTGOMERY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $263,000 · OtherLEADERSHIP MONTGOMERY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC: $125,000 · OtherBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $170,000 · OtherTENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED: $120,000 · Other+80 more: $2,730,922 · Other+80 moreGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,235,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER WASHINGTON COMM…IMPACT SILVER SPRING: $195,000 · PhilanthropyIMPACT SILVER SPRINGWASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS: $110,000 · PhilanthropyWASHINGTON REGIONAL ASS…+5 more: $195,000 · Philanthropy+5 moreMOTHERS OUTREACH NETWORK: $80,000 · Human ServicesMOTHERS OUT…MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $75,000 · Human ServicesMIRIAM'S KI…Virginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights: $70,000 · Human ServicesVirginia Co…CENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $70,000 · Human ServicesCENTREVILLE…INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION: $70,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE F…COMMUNITY MINISTRY OF PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY: $65,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY M…Festival Center Inc: $65,000 · Human ServicesFestival Ce…Asian American LEAD: $55,000 · Human ServicesAsian Ameri…WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON …THE HIVE MENTALITY: $40,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $30,000 · Human Services+11 more: $175,000 · Human Services+11 moreLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC: $155,000 · HealthLA CLINICA…PRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND INC: $115,000 · HealthPRIMARY CA…DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · HealthDISTRICT O…THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $90,000 · HealthTHE PRAXIS…COLLECTIVE ACTION FOR SAFE SPACES: $85,000 · HealthCOLLECTIVE…IDENTITY INC: $55,000 · HealthIDENTITY I…OUR MINDS MATTER: $50,000 · HealthOUR MINDS …COLOR OF GASTROINTESTINAL ILLNESSES INC: $30,000 · HealthMARYLAND CITIZENS' HEALTH INITIATIVE INC: $25,000 · Health+2 more: $35,000 · HealthVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $180,000 · Community ImprovementFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC: $70,000 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA COMMUNITY VOICE INC: $60,000 · Community ImprovementMARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: $60,000 · Community ImprovementSt Luke Legacy Center Foundation Inc: $40,000 · Community ImprovementDC PEACE TEAM: $40,000 · Community ImprovementAFRITHRIVE INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementGATEWAY MUNICIPALITIES COMMUNITY: $25,000 · Community ImprovementDC FISCAL POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 · Community Improvement+4 more: $48,100 · Community ImprovementDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $120,000 · Civil RightsMANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE: $107,000 · Civil RightsVOICES FOR VIRGINIA'S CHILDREN: $95,000 · Civil RightsAsian Pacific Islander Domestic Violence Resource Project: $45,000 · Civil RightsVirginia Civic Engagement Table: $40,000 · Civil RightsWomens Equity Center and Action Network: $40,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC: $40,000 · Civil RightsTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION: $20,000 · Civil Rights+2 more: $25,000 · Civil RightsLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER: $155,000 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC: $100,000 · Crime & LegalDC JUSTICE LAB: $45,000 · Crime & LegalCONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalPEACE FOR DC: $20,000 · Crime & LegalTHE NATIONAL REENTRY NETWORK FOR RE: $20,000 · Crime & LegalWho Speaks for Me Project: $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,548,922Philanthropy$1,735,000Human Services$850,000Health$740,000Community Improvement$578,100Civil Rights$532,000Crime & Legal$375,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,235,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLEADERSHIP MONTGOMERY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $263,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetIMPACT SILVER SPRING: $195,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC: $180,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $170,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER: $155,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC: $155,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCASA INC: $140,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND INC: $125,000 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $120,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetTENANTS AND WORKERS UNITED: $120,000 over 6y, 9.3% of budgetPRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BLACK SWAN ACADEMY INC: $110,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetWASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS: $110,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMANY LANGUAGES ONE VOICE: $107,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPUBLIC JUSTICE CENTER INC: $100,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMARYLAND CENTER ON ECONOMIC POLICY INC: $95,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetVOICES FOR VIRGINIA'S CHILDREN: $95,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $90,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLECTIVE ACTION FOR SAFE SPACES: $85,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetMOTHERS OUTREACH NETWORK: $80,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetThe Commonwealth Institute for: $80,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOOD EQUITY: $75,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetVirginia Coalition For Immigrant Rights: $70,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetCENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $70,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY MINISTRY OF PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY: $65,000 over 4y, 8.9% of budgetFestival Center Inc: $65,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTRABAJADORES UNIDOS DE WASHINGTON DC: $65,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetVIRGINIA COMMUNITY VOICE INC: $60,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC: $60,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetMARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: $60,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetAsian American LEAD: $55,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetFirst Generation College Bound Inc: $55,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetIDENTITY INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPillars Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR MINDS MATTER: $50,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetDC JUSTICE LAB: $45,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetVirginia Interfaith Center For Public Policy: $45,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetAsian Pacific Islander Domestic Violence Resource Project: $45,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eugene & Agnes E Meye…Greater Washington Co…The Morris and Gwendo…Weissberg FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Public Welfare Founda…United Way of the Nat…Annie E Casey Foundat…Philip L Graham Fund …Borealis PhilanthropyRichmond Memorial Hea…Potomac Health Founda…
Eugene & Agnes E Meyer FoundationDC106.1× affinity50 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Weissberg Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Public Welfare Foundation Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Borealis Philanthropy · Richmond Memorial Health Foundation · Potomac Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization If Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from If Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • World Arts Focus: 100% of income from government
  • Afrithrive Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Maryland Association of Non-Profit Organizations: 27% of income from government
  • Conflict Resolution Center of Montgomery County Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Prince George's Child Resource Centerinc: 17% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Identity Inc: 7% of income from government
  • First Generation College Bound Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Public Justice Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Ourspace World Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 156 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on If’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home