· Private foundation
Icf Foundation John D Ong
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of ICF FOUNDATION JOHN D ONG’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AKRON CIVIC THEATRE | $20,000 |
| LAWRENCE SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY | $20,000 |
| PINE POINT SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| AMHERST COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,500 |
| MOUNTAIN WATERSHED ASSOCIATION | $3,500 |
| CASE BARLOW FARM | $3,500 |
| HUDSON HERITAGE ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| BOWDOIN COLLEGE | $2,500 |
| WESTERN RESERVE ACADEMY | $2,500 |
| PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND | $2,500 |
| SMITH COLLEGE MUSEUM OF ART | $2,500 |
| UNIVERSITY SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY TISCH SCHOOL OF THE ARTS | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WRWESTERN RESERVE ACADEMY4× · 2019–2024 · $103k · revenue +25%
- SLST LOUIS UNIVERSITY3× · 2019–2021 · $90k · revenue +9%
- WRWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- WRWESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +27%
- SCSUMMIT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +38%
- CECHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…
Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amherst College Trustees and the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 60 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BALDWIN-BUSS HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PENINSULA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds Hudson Heritage Association ↗
- Who funds PINE POINT SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CASE BARLOW FARM ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY GLEE CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WESTERN RESERVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds Episcopal Preaching Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
- Who funds CULTURAL VISTAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PSI UPSILON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Burton D Morgan Foundation Inc · Hudson Community Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Icf Foundation John D Ong funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Icf Foundation John D Ong?
Find your warmest path to Icf Foundation John D Ong through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.