Skip to content

· Private foundation

Icare Philanthropic Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$123kEducation$95kHuman Services$85kCommunity Improvement$46kRecreation & Sports$19kHealth$18kArts & Culture$11kScience & Tech$9kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
$700
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WISH OF ANGELS MISSIONS$35,000
St MARKS LUTHERAN SCHOOL$21,300
AUTISM HOSPITALITY FDN$5,000
CHINESE AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIO$4,980
Tzu Chi Foundation$3,000
CA YUAN YUNG BUDDHISM CENTER$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
GFCBWSCC$2,025
HK Schools Alumni Federation Founda$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,200
MP PRAJNA BUDDHIST MISSION$1,000
MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION$1,000
S CA Taiwanese American Emergency A$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUKE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $500 → 14%WISH OF ANGELS MISSIONS: $35k → 14%WISH OF ANGELS MISSIONS: $11k → 14%WISH OF ANGELS MISSIONS: $3k → 14%WISH OF ANGELS MISSIONS: $2k → 14%WISH OF ANGELS MISSIONS: $2k → 14%WISH OF ANGELS MISSIONS: $2k → 14%WISH OF ANGELS MISSIONS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$262k · 31 repeat orgs$245k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
99

Total granted

$262k
$226k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+36%

Still filing today

42%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationReligionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    EAST LOS ANGELES COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +23%
  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    2× · 2017–2019 · $9k · revenue +14%
  • CC
    CHINESE CLUB OF SAN MARINO
    4× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • MC
    MINI CARE
    one grant, 2022 · $80k
  • SG
    SAN GABRIEL COUNTRY CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +45%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
—
2
California University - Silicon Valley

Providing professional training of Chinese Medicine (TCM), including acupuncture, Chinese herbology, acupressure, Qigong and so on, granting the students Masters degree. Its a three to four years teaching program.

Education
3
Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Los Angeles

The mission of the organization is to promote and encourage the development of the chinese-american business community througout the greater los angeles area, to serve as an advocate of the chinese business community, to provide a forum…

Community Improvement
4
San Francisco Guzheng Music Society
Arts & Culture
5
Chinese University Alumni Association of Southern California Center for Edu
Education
6
San Fernando Valley Chinese Cultural Association

The san fernando valley chinese cultural association (sfvcca) is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to the preservation and celebration of the splendors of chinese civilization. sfvcca is deeply committed to promoting nutual…

Arts & Culture
7
Southern California Council of Chinese Schools

To promote, propagate and perpetuate chinese language and culture to assist and guide member chinese schools for their betterment to encourage cooperation and to facilitate the interchange of ideas and experiences among member chinese…

—
8
Monterey Bay Chinese Association

Provide Chinese Culture and Help to Advance social, economic well-being of Chinese American at Monterey Bay, California.

Arts & Culture
9
Central California Chinese Culture Center Inc

To preserve and promote chinese cultures. there are more than 1000 people who visit the center annually in addition to being open to school field trips. no admission charged.

Arts & Culture
10
Foundation for Chinese Cultural Heritage
Philanthropy
11
Torrance Chinese School

Torrance Chinese School is a non-profit, non-religious and non-political educational institution which provides a friendly environment for students who are interested in learning the Chinese language. The school offers classes not only for…

Arts & Culture
12
Scarsdale Chinese Association Inc
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Taiwan Center Foundation of Greater Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Charles J Soong Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 148 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
26/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MINI CARE: $80,000 · OtherMINI CARESt MARKS LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $38,300 · OtherSt MARKS LUTHERAN SCHOOLCHINESE AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIO: $38,260 · OtherCHINESE AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIOSAN GABRIEL COUNTRY CLUB: $14,668 · Other+121 more: $175,836 · Other+121 moreWISH OF ANGEL'S MISSIONS: $56,500 · Human ServicesWISH OF ANGE…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $34,650 · ReligionBUDDHIST …MP PRAJNA BUDDHIST MISSION INC: $5,400 · ReligionMP PRAJNA…+2 more: $1,340 · ReligionEAST LOS ANGELES COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,640 · EducationBUDDHIST TZU CHI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $9,000 · EducationMORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationGO AND LOVE FOUNDATION: $4,500 · EducationCHINESE CLUB OF SAN MARINO: $5,550 · Arts & CulturePasadena Showcase House For The Arts: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $610 · Arts & CultureMHG CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,000 · HealthUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $350 · Health+3 more: $660 · HealthLINCOLN TRANING CENTER AND REHABILITATION WORKSHOP: $4,200 · Employment
Other$347,064Human Services$57,000Religion$41,390Education$40,140Arts & Culture$9,160Health$8,010Employment$4,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISH OF ANGEL'S MISSIONS: $56,500 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION: $34,650 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAN GABRIEL COUNTRY CLUB: $14,668 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEAST LOS ANGELES COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,640 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHINESE CLUB OF SAN MARINO: $5,550 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMP PRAJNA BUDDHIST MISSION INC: $5,400 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGO AND LOVE FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLINCOLN TRANING CENTER AND REHABILITATION WORKSHOP: $4,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena Showcase House For The Arts: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLA OPEN TABLE TENNIS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE BIBLE MISSIONS CHURCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES TABLE TENNIS ASSOC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUKE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUSC ARCADIA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWONG TAI-SEN CENTER: $340 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARE MISSION USA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARROYO VISTA FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $210 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSEMEAD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOCIETY FOR CONFUCIAN STUDIES OF AMERICA: $200 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAHMC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBEIJING ASSOCIATION USA: $175 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH PASADENA CHINESE-AMERICAN CLUB: $85 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISH OF ANGEL'S MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN GABRIEL COUNTRY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds EAST LOS ANGELES COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUDDHIST TZU CHI EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE CLUB OF SAN MARINO ↗
  • Who funds MP PRAJNA BUDDHIST MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MHG CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GO AND LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN TRANING CENTER AND REHABILITATION WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Showcase House For The Arts ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Grace and Li Yu Family FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Grace and Li Yu Family Foundation · Wish of Angel's Missions · MY Charitable Foundation · Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California · Hong W Moy Foundation · Sean and Christine Yu Private Foundation · Cathay Bank Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Icare Philanthropic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Icare Philanthropic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Icare Philanthropic Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Icare Philanthropic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 148 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Icare Philanthropic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph