Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hong W Moy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$636kArts & Culture$345kHealth$143kCommunity Improvement$111kReligion$43kRecreation & Sports$10kYouth Development$4kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION$32,500
BOWERS MUSEUM$24,845
CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE$11,000
PROJECT VISION$3,000
CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM$3,000
ST THERESE CHINESE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$3,000
Coalition For A Better Chinese Amer$2,000
The Asian Pacific Cultural Center A$2,000
PUI TAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
JOHN CHARLES HAINES SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 76% of grant dollars ($981k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 24% that went abroad ($312k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NAMO AMITABHA SOCIETY: $10k → 8%BOWERS MUSEUM: $78k → 10%THE HNTINGTON LIBRARY: $100k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR LUPUS RESEARCH: $2k → 17%SPECAIL OLYMPICS INC: $10k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $22k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION: $200k → 19%NAMO AMITABHA SOCIETY: $10k → 8%BOWERS MUSEUM: $25k → 10%MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION: $64k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $22k → 14%OC ASSOCIATE FOR BUDDHIST PRECTICE: $10k → 10%MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION: $63k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $21k → 14%MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $11k → 14%MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION: $33k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $11k → 14%MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION: $21k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE: $10k → 14%CHINESE CLUB OF SAN MARINO: $12k → 14%PROJECT VISION: $3k → 14%MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF CHICAGO: $2k → 14%NAMO AMITABHA SOCIETY: $10k → 14%PUI TAK CENTER: $2k → 14%THE WALDEN FUND: $25k → 14%Coalition For A Better Chinese Amer: $2k → 14%THE WALDEN FUND: $25k → 14%PUI TAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $2k → 14%WALDEN SCHOOL: $1k → 14%JOHN CHARLES HAINES SCHOOL: $1k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $21k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $12k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $10k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $10k → 14%THE LOS ANGELES CHEN LUN ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $10k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $10k → 14%ST THERESE CHINESE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $4k → 14%CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM: $3k → 14%ST THERESE CHINESE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $4k → 14%CHINESE CONSOLIDATED BENEVELENT: $2k → 14%ST THERESE CHINESE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 14%CHINESE CONSOLIDATED BENEVELENT: $2k → 14%CHINESE CONSOLIDATED BENEVELENT: $2k → 14%HKSAF: $10k → 14%The Asian Pacific Cultural Center A: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US — 24% of all-years giving ($312k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
China$312k · 8 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Hong W Moy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 50% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 32% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Hong W Moy Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 42% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$754k · 15 repeat orgs$540k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$754k
$538k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+1%

Still filing today

47%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION
    2× · 2019–2024 · $103k · revenue +28%
  • CA
    CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $97k · revenue +85%
  • PV
    PROJECT VISION INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $4k · revenue +268%

Funded once

  • University of Illinois Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $200k · revenue +127%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $141k
  • TH
    THE HNTINGTON LIBRARY
    one grant, 2018 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Advanced China Research
2
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
3
Ray Chinese School

Ray chinese school is a non-for-profit corporation that operates one of the largest chinese schools in the chicago area.

Education
4
California University - Silicon Valley

Providing professional training of Chinese Medicine (TCM), including acupuncture, Chinese herbology, acupressure, Qigong and so on, granting the students Masters degree. Its a three to four years teaching program.

Education
5
Torrance Chinese School

Torrance Chinese School is a non-profit, non-religious and non-political educational institution which provides a friendly environment for students who are interested in learning the Chinese language. The school offers classes not only for…

Arts & Culture
6
Kwong Kow Chinese School Inc

To respond to the expressed needs of the boston chinatown community to provide children with knowledge of the chinese language and culture.

7
Pacific East Quality Education

Ycis silicon valley is a welcoming school community where all children from preschool through grade 8 are encouraged to find and follow their gifts as they learn in both chinese and english. our goal:to help our students become…

Education
8
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
9
Yu Ming Charter School

As a leader in mandarin immersion education, we nurture our inclusive and diverse community to become empowered, engaged, and outstanding global citizens.

Education
10
Chinese Mutual Aid Association

Proudly founded by ethnic chinese refugees, chinese mutual aid association (cmaa) is led by many prominent individuals from the asian american community. our purpose is to serve the needs, promote the interests, and enhance the well-being…

Human Services
11
Chinese American International School

At cais, we are committed to inspiring and empowering learners to: embrace chinese, become our best selves, and contribute to a better world.

Education
12
Yunguang Chan Center

Religious culture and education, meditation and religions comparative study

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese American Service League Inc and the most unlike its peers is Orange County Association for Buddhist Practices Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $140,720 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE HNTINGTON LIBRARY — $100,000 · OtherTHE HNTINGTON LIBRARYTAISHAN CITY CENTRAL SCHOOL — $88,102 · OtherTAISHAN CITY CENTRAL SCHOOLTHE WALDEN FUND — $50,000 · OtherTHE WALDEN FUNDTAISHAN SHI JIAO YU JU — $43,124 · OtherTAISHAN SHI JIAO YU JUNAMO AMITABHA SOCIETY — $30,000 · Other+15 more — $114,587 · Other+15 moreMORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION — $231,500 · EducationMORNING LIGHT FOUNDATIONUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $200,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation+1 more — $3,000 · EducationCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION — $102,845 · Arts & CultureCHARLES W BOWERS…FRIENDS OF THE CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM — $75,574 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE C…CHINESE CLUB OF SAN MARINO — $11,500 · Arts & CultureCHINESE CLUB OF …CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $96,732 · Community ImprovementPROJECT VISION INC — $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $2,000 · Health
Other$566,533Education$434,500Arts & Culture$189,919Community Improvement$96,732Youth Development$4,000Health$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION — $231,500 over 6y, 17% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION — $102,845 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC — $96,732 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM — $75,574 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCHINESE CLUB OF SAN MARINO — $11,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetORANGE COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR BUDDHIST PRACTICES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPROJECT VISION INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPUI TAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPUI TAK CENTER — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WALDEN SCHOOL OF CALIFORNIA — $1,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORNING LIGHT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation
  • Who funds CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION
  • Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHINESE AMERICAN MUSEUM
  • Who funds CHINESE CLUB OF SAN MARINO
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR BUDDHIST PRACTICES INC
  • Who funds PROJECT VISION INC
  • Who funds PUI TAK CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds PUI TAK CENTER
  • Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds THE WALDEN SCHOOL OF CALIFORNIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Charity FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Charity Foundation · Icare Philanthropic Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hong W Moy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hong W Moy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hong W Moy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph