Skip to content
Ibew Local No 48 at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ibew Local No 48

Promote safe employment for fair wages for members.

$314k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$522kEducation$92kRecreation & Sports$79kArts & Culture$72kPublic Benefit$10kHousing & Shelter$10kScience & Tech$7kMembership Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $215,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $313,745 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $98,745 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $145k
$35,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$75M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL$90,000
HILLSBORO HOPS SHORT SEASON LLC$55,000
LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY$35,000
PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION$25,000
UKANDU$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL: $65k → 10%IBEW LOCAL 340: $25k → 12%IBEW UNITY FUND: $50k → 14%HILLSBORO HOPS BASEBALL: $79k → 8%KIDS CHANCE OF OREGON: $10k → 8%CONSTRUCTING HOPE: $30k → 12%GORGE TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE: $7k → 16%IURBAN TEEN: $12k → 9%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL: $90k → 9%IURBAN TEEN: $10k → 9%KOREAN WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL: $10k → 6%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL: $40k → 10%HILLSBORO HOPS SHORT SEASON LLC: $55k → 8%CONSTRUCTING HOPE: $20k → 12%WASHINGTON STATE ASSOCIATION OF: $5k → 9%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL: $72k → 9%NATIONAL ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORIT: $39k → 10%REBUILD TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY: $10k → 8%CONSTRUCTING HOPE: $20k → 12%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY: $25k → 10%NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 12%NATIONAL ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORIT: $10k → 10%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $35k → 12%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY: $10k → 10%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $31k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $31k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $24k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $21k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $12k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $8k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $7k → 12%NW OREGON LABOR COUNCIL: $6k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $6k → 12%ALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $25k → 12%PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $24k → 12%PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $24k → 12%UKANDU: $10k → 12%NECA IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING: $10k → 12%NECA IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING: $10k → 12%NECA IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING: $10k → 12%NECA IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING: $10k → 12%OREGON TRADESWOMEN INC: $15k → 12%OREGON TRADESWOMEN INC: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$889k · 10 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +87% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$889k
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+25%

Still filing today

60%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Labors Community Service Agency Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $174k · revenue +224%
  • Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program
    3× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +140%
  • OT
    Oregon Tradeswomen Inc
    2× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +25%
  • IB
    INTL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 340graduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +162%
  • AC
    ALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +81%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701

Operating engineers local 701 represents heavy equipment operators, heavy duty repairers, technical engineers and stationary engineers in oregon and southwest washington and promotes wage levels, benefits and working conditions of its…

Employment
2
Eastern Oregon Workforce Board

To coordinate the resources need to help employers succeed and individuals to advance through innovation and partnerships.

Community Improvement
3
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

—
4
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 18

Local 18 iuoe is a labor organization that has been instrumental in negotiating progressive contracts for the residential & heavy highway & building industry.

—
5
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
6
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 288

To organize all electrical workers in the construction industry, to promote goodwill among all of those in our trade, to assist each other in sickness and in distress, to secure employment for our members, to secure adequate pay for our…

—
7
Oregon and Southern Idaho Laborers - Employers Training Trust Fund

Training, education and certification of unionized construction craft laborers and apprentices to make them more competitive.

Education
8
The Laborers Northwest Regional Organizing Coalition

The northwest regional organizing coalition (nroc) is established and exists to increase union participation in the industries in which the laborers' international union of north america (liuna!) currently represents workers. it is nroc's…

—
9
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 624

The organization is a trade union that represents operating engineers, who work as heavy equipment operators, mechanics,and surveyors in the construction industry, and stationary engineers, who work in operations and maintenance in…

—
10
Laborers International Union of North America Local Union No 242

Serving the greater seattle area, the union is committed to working on behalf of their members with the main goal of making the quality of life better for them and their families.

—
11
International Union of Operating Engineers' Local 324

To anticipate for, and capitalize on the ever-changing economic, social, political and legal challenges facing our union; to provide an unmatched level of services to members through a dedicated, loyal team of professionals.

—
12
Lane Workforce Partnership

To meet the workforce needs of employers and individuals through partnerships and innovations in lane county, oregon.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Native American Youth and Family Center; the most unlike its peers is Gen Richard G Stillwell Korean War Veterans Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL: $267,000 · OtherELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCALHILLSBORO HOPS BASEBALL: $134,000 · OtherHILLSBORO HOPS BASEBALLINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $50,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERSNATIONAL ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORIT: $49,160 · OtherNATIONAL ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITIndividual grant recipient: $35,038 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 340: $25,048 · Other+5 more: $33,275 · Other+5 moreLabors Community Service Agency Inc: $174,174 · EmploymentLabors Community Serv…Oregon Tradeswomen Inc: $25,500 · EmploymentOregon Tradeswomen In…Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program: $70,000 · EducationConstructing H…NECA-IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING CENTER: $40,000 · EducationNECA-IBEW ELEC…IURBAN TEEN: $22,000 · EducationIURBAN TEENPORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $72,000 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND R…ALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $24,500 · Arts & CultureALL CLASSI…Kids Chance of Oregon: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUKANDU: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsGEN RICHARD G STILLWELL KOREAN WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$593,521Employment$199,674Education$132,000Arts & Culture$96,500Philanthropy$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLabors Community Service Agency Inc: $174,174 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetPORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $72,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetConstructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program: $70,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNECA-IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING CENTER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOregon Tradeswomen Inc: $25,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetINTL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 340: $25,048 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $24,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIURBAN TEEN: $22,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetKids Chance of Oregon: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGEN RICHARD G STILLWELL KOREAN WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCOLUMBIA RIVER GORGE TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE: $7,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetNorthwest Oregon Labor Council: $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $5,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …United Association of…Worksystems IncThe Robert D and Marc…OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · United Association of Journeymen & 290 Local · Worksystems Inc · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ibew Local No 48 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ibew Local No 48. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Oregon Tradeswomen Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center: 23% of income from government
  • Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program: 2% of income from government
  • Portland Rose Festival Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • All Classical Public Media Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ibew Local No 48’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home