Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ibew Local No 48

Promote safe employment for fair wages for members.

$285k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Employment$522kEducation$92kRecreation & Sports$79kArts & Culture$72kPublic Benefit$10kHousing & Shelter$10kScience & Tech$7kMembership Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $159,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $284,503 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $125,503 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$23,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$65M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL$72,000
LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY$23,500
PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION$23,500
CONSTRUCTING HOPE$20,000
REBUILD TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY$10,000
IURBAN TEEN$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL: $65k → 10%IBEW LOCAL 340: $25k → 12%IBEW UNITY FUND: $50k → 14%HILLSBORO HOPS BASEBALL: $79k → 8%KIDS CHANCE OF OREGON: $10k → 8%CONSTRUCTING HOPE: $30k → 12%GORGE TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE: $7k → 16%IURBAN TEEN: $12k → 9%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL: $72k → 9%IURBAN TEEN: $10k → 9%KOREAN WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL: $10k → 6%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL: $40k → 10%REBUILD TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY: $10k → 8%CONSTRUCTING HOPE: $20k → 12%WASHINGTON STATE ASSOCIATION OF: $5k → 9%NATIONAL ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORIT: $39k → 10%CONSTRUCTING HOPE: $20k → 12%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY: $25k → 10%NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 12%ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY: $10k → 10%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $31k → 12%NATIONAL ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORIT: $10k → 10%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $31k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $24k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $21k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $12k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $8k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $7k → 12%LABOR COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $6k → 12%NW OREGON LABOR COUNCIL: $6k → 12%ALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $25k → 12%PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $24k → 12%PORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION: $24k → 12%NECA IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING: $10k → 12%NECA IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING: $10k → 12%NECA IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING: $10k → 12%NECA IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING: $10k → 12%OREGON TRADESWOMEN INC: $15k → 12%OREGON TRADESWOMEN INC: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$605k · 9 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$605k
$222k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+25%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEmploymentArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Labors Community Service Agency Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $139k · revenue +224%
  • Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program
    3× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +140%
  • OT
    Oregon Tradeswomen Inc
    2× · 2017–2021 · $26k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • HH
    HILLSBORO HOPS BASEBALL
    one grant, 2023 · $79k
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +25%
  • IB
    INTL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 340graduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +137%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

2
Eastern Oregon Workforce Board

To coordinate the resources need to help employers succeed and individuals to advance through innovation and partnerships.

Community Improvement
3
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701

Operating engineers local 701 represents heavy equipment operators, heavy duty repairers, technical engineers and stationary engineers in oregon and southwest washington and promotes wage levels, benefits and working conditions of its…

Employment
4
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 288

To organize all electrical workers in the construction industry, to promote goodwill among all of those in our trade, to assist each other in sickness and in distress, to secure employment for our members, to secure adequate pay for our…

5
Oregon and Southern Idaho Laborers - Employers Training Trust Fund

Training, education and certification of unionized construction craft laborers and apprentices to make them more competitive.

Education
6
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 18

Local 18 iuoe is a labor organization that has been instrumental in negotiating progressive contracts for the residential & heavy highway & building industry.

7
Lane Workforce Partnership

To meet the workforce needs of employers and individuals through partnerships and innovations in lane county, oregon.

8
Afl-Cio Snohomish & Island County Labor Council

Member, affiliate, and community education for worker's issues - union and non-union

9
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

10
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers 194 Local

Labor union - electrical workers

11
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 606

The Union and its employees work for the benefit of its membership including negotiations of wages, benefits, and working conditions.

12
The Laborers Northwest Regional Organizing Coalition

The northwest regional organizing coalition (nroc) is established and exists to increase union participation in the industries in which the laborers' international union of north america (liuna!) currently represents workers. it is nroc's…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oregon Tradeswomen Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gen Richard G Stillwell Korean War Veterans Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCAL — $177,000 · OtherELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITY CAUCUS LOCALHILLSBORO HOPS BASEBALL — $79,000 · OtherHILLSBORO HOPS BASEBALLINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS — $50,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERSNATIONAL ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORIT — $49,160 · OtherNATIONAL ELECTRICAL WORKERS MINORITIndividual grant recipient — $35,038 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 340 — $25,048 · OtherINTL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 340+3 more — $21,250 · OtherLabors Community Service Agency Inc — $139,174 · EmploymentLabors Community Servi…Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — $25,500 · EmploymentOregon Tradeswomen IncConstructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — $70,000 · EducationConstructing Hope…NECA-IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING CENTER — $40,000 · EducationNECA-IBEW ELECTRI…IURBAN TEEN — $22,000 · EducationIURBAN TEENPORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION — $47,000 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND …ALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $24,500 · Arts & CultureALL CLASS…GEN RICHARD G STILLWELL KOREAN WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Public BenefitKids Chance of Oregon — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBIA RIVER GORGE TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE — $7,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $5,025 · Youth Development
Other$436,496Employment$164,674Education$132,000Arts & Culture$71,500Public Benefit$10,000Philanthropy$10,000Community Improvement$7,000Youth Development$5,025

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLabors Community Service Agency Inc — $139,174 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetConstructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program — $70,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND ROSE FESTIVAL FOUNDATION — $47,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNECA-IBEW ELECTRICAL TRAINING CENTER — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOregon Tradeswomen Inc — $25,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetINTL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 340 — $25,048 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALL CLASSICAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $24,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIURBAN TEEN — $22,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGEN RICHARD G STILLWELL KOREAN WAR VETERANS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetKids Chance of Oregon — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER WASHINGTON COUNTY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCOLUMBIA RIVER GORGE TECHNOLOGY ALLIANCE — $7,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetNorthwest Oregon Labor Council — $6,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $5,025 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · United Association of Journeymen & 290 Local · Worksystems Inc · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ibew Local No 48 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Oregon Tradeswomen Inc46% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center23% of income from government
  • Constructing Hope Pre-Apprenticeship Program2% of income from government
  • Portland Rose Festival Foundation1% of income from government
  • All Classical Public Media Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph