Skip to content
IAAAA Education Institute Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

IAAAA Education Institute Inc

To assist those who work with aging and disabled persons through education and training primarily through local area agencies on aging in Indiana.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$394k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$806kCommunity Improvement$471k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $178k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $479k
  • $250k+2 grants · $691k
$42,277
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions$393,878
CoAction$297,100
Lifestream Services$104,955
Lifespan Resources$86,592
Aging and In-Home Services of Northeast Indiana Inc$80,749
Area Five Agency on Aging and Community Service$77,748
Real Services Inc$74,479
Thrive Alliance$54,286
Hoosier Uplands$42,277
Lifetime Resources Inc$39,778
West Central Indiana Economic Development District$39,734
Area 10 Agency on Aging$17,705
Southwestern Indiana Regional Council on Aging$14,775
Hendricks County Senior Services Inc$12,945
Agency on Aging$10,926
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $613k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Hendricks County Senior Services Inc: $17k → 5%Lifetime Resources Inc: $47k → 11%Aging and In-Home Services of Northeast Indiana Inc: $81k → 12%Area Five Agency on Aging and Community Service: $64k → 13%CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions: $124k → 16%Area 10 Agency on Aging: $18k → 18%Lifestream Services: $115k → 19%Hendricks County Senior Services Inc: $16k → 5%Aging and In-Home Services of Northeast Indiana Inc: $44k → 12%Area Five Agency on Aging and Community Service: $25k → 13%CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions: $25k → 16%Lifestream Services: $24k → 19%AGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $7k → 12%Aging and In-Home Services of Northeast Indiana Inc: $6k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 18 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue 0% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$2.4M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
-4%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $167k · revenue +31%
  • WC
    WEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $81k · revenue +15%
  • VU
    VINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $48k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IA
    Indiana Association of Area Agencies on Aging Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aging and Community Services of South Central Indiana Inc

Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…

Human Services
2
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
3
Central Illinois Agency On Aging Inc

Central illinois agency on aging believes in the independence and dignity of older persons, and that each older person should be empowered to exert control over their own life & have access to needed services. we do planning, program…

—
4
Area Agency On Aging District 7 Inc

Assisting individuals to maintain independence and personal choice by providing resource options and services

—
5
Northwestern Il Area Agency On Aging

To enable older persons to live in dignity and independence.

—
6
Area Agency On Aging Region 9 Inc

The organization's mission is to work with people, communities, and organizations to educate, prepare, and assist them in meeting the needs of the aging.the organization's vision is to be the recognized community leader in providing…

Human Services
7
Seniorage Area Agency On Aging

A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.

Human Services
8
Vna Extended Home Care

The organization was established to promote health, mobility, dignity, independence and social well-being for individuals and families in the Indiana County, PA area by providing home care and related services.

—
9
Area 1 Agency On Aging

Area 1 agency on aging provides leadership and services that support and promote healthy aging.

Human Services
10
Ohio District 5 Area Agency On Aging Inc

The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…

—
11
Tippecanoe County Council On Aging Inc

Providing seniors with services and programs to promote overall wellness.

Human Services
12
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwestern Indiana Regional Council On Aging Inc Dba Swirca & More; the most unlike its peers is Vincennes University Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
6/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CICOA AGING & IN-HOME SOLUTIONS INC: $543,159 · Human ServicesCICOA AGING & IN-HOME SOLUTIONS INCLifeStream Services Inc: $243,784 · Human ServicesLifeStream Services IncAREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $166,525 · Human ServicesAREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICESREAL SERVICES INC: $142,532 · Human ServicesREAL SERVICES INCAGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $138,253 · Human ServicesAGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INCLifetime Resources Inc: $86,938 · Human ServicesLifetime Resources Inc+3 more: $127,302 · Human Services+3 moreNorthwest Indiana Community Action Corporation: $389,699 · Community ImprovementNorthwest Indiana Communi…WEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $80,836 · Community ImprovementWEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECON…HOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $75,162 · Community ImprovementHOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC …LIFESPAN RESOURCES INC: $204,873 · OtherLIFESPAN RESOURC…THRIVE ALLIANCE INC: $85,516 · OtherTHRIVE ALLIANCE …Agency on Aging: $32,176 · OtherAgency on AgingPRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC: $20,975 · OtherPRIMELIFE ENRICH…VINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $47,697 · EducationSAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC: $17,200 · HealthIndiana Association of Area Agencies on Aging Inc: $5,086 · Civil Rights
Human Services$1,448,493Community Improvement$545,697Other$343,540Education$47,697Health$17,200Civil Rights$5,086

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCICOA AGING & IN-HOME SOLUTIONS INC: $543,159 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNorthwest Indiana Community Action Corporation: $389,699 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLifeStream Services Inc: $243,784 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLIFESPAN RESOURCES INC: $204,873 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetAREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES: $166,525 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetREAL SERVICES INC: $142,532 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC: $138,253 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLifetime Resources Inc: $86,938 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $80,836 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $75,162 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $47,697 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $46,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE: $45,463 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING OF MONROE AND OWEN COUNTIES INC: $35,339 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC: $20,975 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetSAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC: $17,200 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetIndiana Association of Area Agencies on Aging Inc: $5,086 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Commu…Duke Energy FoundationUsagingAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Usaging · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization IAAAA Education Institute Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from IAAAA Education Institute Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on IAAAA Education Institute’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home