· Public charity
IAAAA Education Institute Inc
To assist those who work with aging and disabled persons through education and training primarily through local area agencies on aging in Indiana.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $178k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $479k
- $250k+2 grants · $691k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions | $393,878 |
| CoAction | $297,100 |
| Lifestream Services | $104,955 |
| Lifespan Resources | $86,592 |
| Aging and In-Home Services of Northeast Indiana Inc | $80,749 |
| Area Five Agency on Aging and Community Service | $77,748 |
| Real Services Inc | $74,479 |
| Thrive Alliance | $54,286 |
| Hoosier Uplands | $42,277 |
| Lifetime Resources Inc | $39,778 |
| West Central Indiana Economic Development District | $39,734 |
| Area 10 Agency on Aging | $17,705 |
| Southwestern Indiana Regional Council on Aging | $14,775 |
| Hendricks County Senior Services Inc | $12,945 |
| Agency on Aging | $10,926 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $613k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES3× · 2023–2025 · $167k · revenue +31%
- WCWEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC3× · 2023–2025 · $81k · revenue +15%
- VUVINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC2× · 2023–2024 · $48k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- IAIndiana Association of Area Agencies on Aging Incone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Working together, our mission is to enhance the quality of life in our communities, generation through generation to assist older adults, persons with disabilities, and persons that have needs, to access opportunities that will allow them…
Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…
Central illinois agency on aging believes in the independence and dignity of older persons, and that each older person should be empowered to exert control over their own life & have access to needed services. we do planning, program…
Assisting individuals to maintain independence and personal choice by providing resource options and services
To enable older persons to live in dignity and independence.
The organization's mission is to work with people, communities, and organizations to educate, prepare, and assist them in meeting the needs of the aging.the organization's vision is to be the recognized community leader in providing…
A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.
The organization was established to promote health, mobility, dignity, independence and social well-being for individuals and families in the Indiana County, PA area by providing home care and related services.
Area 1 agency on aging provides leadership and services that support and promote healthy aging.
The ohio district 5 area agency on aging, inc. provides leadership, collaboration, coordination and services to older adults, people with disabilities, their caregivers and resource networks that support individual choice, independence and…
Providing seniors with services and programs to promote overall wellness.
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwestern Indiana Regional Council On Aging Inc Dba Swirca & More and the most unlike its peers is Vincennes University Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CICOA AGING & IN-HOME SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Northwest Indiana Community Action Corporation ↗
- Who funds LifeStream Services Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFESPAN RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds AREA FIVE AGENCY ON AGING & COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds REAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AGING AND IN-HOME SERVICES OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Lifetime Resources Inc ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL INDIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC ↗
- Who funds HOOSIER UPLANDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds VINCENNES UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HENDRICKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL ON AGING INC DBA SWIRCA & MORE ↗
- Who funds AREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING OF MONROE AND OWEN COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds PRIMELIFE ENRICHMENT INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana Association of Area Agencies on Aging Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Usaging · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization IAAAA Education Institute Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.