Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hyman & Susan Feldman Family Foundation C/O Ina Burd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$696
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$40kEducation$30kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$12kInternational$8kFood & Nutrition$6kHousing & Shelter$6kPublic Benefit$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANCONA SCHOOL$696
BLOCK CLUB OF CHICAGO$500
DAVID KABAKOW FOUNDATION$500
SALVATION ARMY$500
NAMI$400
PERCEPTUAL MOTION$200
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$200
THRESHOLDS$200
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$200
BRAINS AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH$200
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$200
GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN$200
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO COURT RELIEF$200
AUSTIN RIGGS CENTER$200
ST JUDES CHILDREN RESEARCH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $300 → 8%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25 → 14%SHALVA: $6k → 14%SHALVA: $1k → 14%SHALVA: $1k → 14%SHALVA: $600 → 14%SHALVA: $400 → 14%SHALVA: $100 → 14%SHALVA: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
NJ
CT
CA
NE
VA
AZ
TN
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 41 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
47

Total granted

$129k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+25%

Still filing today

61%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    The Ancona School
    7× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +36%
  • SI
    SHALVA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $10k · revenue +74%
  • TT
    THE THRESHOLDS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • 2C
    21ST CENTURY DADS
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • CC
    CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • CR
    CORONAVIRUS RESCUE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
2
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
3
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
4
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
5
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
6
Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc

The Auditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University ("The Auditorium"), an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, is committed to presenting the finest in international, cultural, community and educational programming to Chicago and to the…

Arts & Culture
7
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
8
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
9
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
10
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
11
Chicago Shakespeare Theater

To create vivid, entertaining theatrical experiences that invigorate and engage people of all ages and identities by illuminating the complexity, ambiguity, and wonder of our world. shared humanity and unforgettable stories - now this is…

Arts & Culture
12
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids First Chicago for Education; the most unlike its peers is Illinois Fatherhood Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
31/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $13,124 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNAMI: $12,200 · OtherNAMIDAVID J KABAKOW FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · OtherDAVID J KABAKOW FOUNDATION INCTHE THRESHOLDS: $5,950 · OtherTHE THRESHOLDSBRAINS AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH: $5,700 · OtherBRAINS AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCHCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $5,225 · OtherCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESSSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $2,650 · Other+57 more: $27,825 · Other+57 moreThe Ancona School: $27,346 · EducationThe Ancona School+3 more: $1,450 · EducationSHALVA INC: $9,720 · Human Services+3 more: $425 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,900 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,500 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $1,000 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $500 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $500 · International+1 more: $200 · InternationalBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION: $2,600 · Arts & CultureURBAN GATEWAYS: $1,400 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,200 · Arts & CultureAmericans for the Arts Inc: $700 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony Orchestra: $650 · Arts & CultureHEDWIG DANCES INC: $500 · Arts & CultureMANDALA SOUTH ASIAN PERFORMING ARTS INC: $300 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $450 · Arts & CultureAUSTEN RIGGS CENTER INC: $6,000 · Health+1 more: $25 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5,675 · Food & Nutrition
Other$78,674Education$28,796Human Services$10,145International$8,600Arts & Culture$7,800Health$6,025Food & Nutrition$5,675

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Ancona School: $27,346 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSHALVA INC: $9,720 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTEN RIGGS CENTER INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $5,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $5,675 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $5,225 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $2,650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION: $2,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN GATEWAYS: $1,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT PROMISES FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASTESHED: $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPERCEPTUAL MOTION INC: $750 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetAmericans for the Arts Inc: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION: $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEDWIG DANCES INC: $500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS ARTS ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH AMERICA: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMANDALA SOUTH ASIAN PERFORMING ARTS INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUNDS GOOD CHOIR NFP: $250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Human Rhythm Project: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSedona Charter School Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO SINFONIETTA INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Ancona School ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTEN RIGGS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds URBAN GATEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT PROMISES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE WASTESHED ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS FATHERHOOD INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PERCEPTUAL MOTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Americans for the Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL26.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Field Foundation of Illinois · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Joyce Foundation · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · The Irving Harris Foundation · Walder Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hyman & Susan Feldman Family Foundation C/O Ina Burd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hyman & Susan Feldman Family Foundation C/O Ina Burd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Austen Riggs Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hyman & Susan Feldman Family Foundation C/O Ina Burd’s filings →

More from the funding graph