Skip to content
Hutchinson Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Hutchinson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$32kHealth$24kEducation$9kAnimals$8kHuman Services$4kArts & Culture$3kReligion$3kEnvironment$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN$10,000
YMCA$2,600
KCMS FOUNDATION$2,500
MAT VALLEY KITTIES AND PUPPIES RESCUE INC$2,500
BRIGHT LIGHTS BOOK PROJECT$2,500
PACIFIC CANCER FOUNDATION$2,500
KCMS FOUNDATION$2,500
KIHEI CANOE CLUB$2,500
UCSB FOUNDATION PARENTS FUND$1,000
KLAHOWYA SECONDARY SCHOOLS$990
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%KIHEI CANOE CLUB: $3k → 9%ALPHA DELTA PI FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%KIHEI CANOE CLUB: $500 → 9%YMCA PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $3k → 9%BREMERTON YACHT CLUB: $3k → 10%BRIGHT LIGHTS BOOK PROJECT: $3k → 10%UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%LANAI CAT SANCTUARY: $3k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%YMCA PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $3k → 9%OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN: $10k → 10%MAT VALLEY KITTIES AND PUPPIES RESCUE INC: $3k → 10%UCSB FOUNDATION PARENTS FUND: $1k → 14%PACIFIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $3k → 9%YMCA PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $1k → 9%KCMS FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%UCSB FOUNDATION PARENTS FUND: $1k → 14%YMCA PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $1k → 9%YMCA: $3k → 10%UCSB FDN PARENTS FUND: $1k → 14%OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN: $3k → 10%SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%KCMS FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN: $3k → 10%KCMS FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN: $3k → 10%KCMS FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%KCMS FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN: $1k → 10%KCMS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%KCMS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%KITSAP SAILING & ROWING FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%KCMS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%KLAHOWYA SECONDARY SCHOOLS: $990 → 10%KLAHOWYA SECONDARY SCHOOLS: $990 → 10%KCMS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%KITSAP RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 10%KCMS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$50k · 6 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$50k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+9%

Still filing today

33%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $19k
  • KF
    KCMS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +55%
  • YP
    YMCA PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $7k

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MICHAEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • LC
    LANAI CAT SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kirkland Foundation

The org's mission is to rescue, nurture, and relocate at-risk animals in the ca central valley.

Human Services
2
Cat Tree & Barkery Rescue

To slow down and stop the overpopulation of unwanted pets on the kenai peninsula

Animals
3
Rescue Kitties of Hawaii

To save Hawaii Kitties by providing critical care and services that transform these sick, injured, tortured, and abused cats/kittens into a placeable position. The success of the cat/kitten placement has been enhanced by the non-profit…

Animals
4
Humane Society of Kodiak

To prevent cruelty to animals

Animals
5
Kuakini Foundation

The mission of kuakini foundation is to improve the health status of the community by: providing comprehensive health care services and programs at reasonable cost; continuously improving the quality of health care services and programs;…

—
6
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation

To benefit the university of california santa cruz.

Education
7
Aloha Puu Kukui

Protection and conservation of the environment and ecosystems of the west maui mountains through restoration and conservation projects.

Environment
8
Kauai Spca

To provide a safety net for Kauai's homeless pets that cannot be assisted through existing Island Rescue efforts.

Animals
9
Ke Kai Ala Foundation

The Kona Brewers Festival is a potent blend of craft beer, Hawaiian culture and charitable support. This beloved event brings beer enthusiasts and the community together while raising money for impactful causes focusing on conservation,…

Arts & Culture
10
Hawaii Island Humane Society Spca

The mission of the hawaii island humane society is to prevent cruelty to animals, eliminate pet over population, and enhance the bond between humans and animals.

Animals
11
Kauai Ferals

Resolve the homeless cat problem on kauai.

Animals
12
Kitty Harbor

Health & welfare of abandonded & homeless cats

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kitsap Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Mat Valley Kitties & Puppies Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN: $18,500 · OtherOLYMPIC LUTHERHAVENYMCA PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES: $7,400 · OtherYMCA PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIESST MICHAEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $3,500 · OtherST MICHAEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONUCSB FOUNDATION PARENTS FUND: $3,000 · OtherUCSB FOUNDATION PARENTS FUNDYMCA: $2,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherOLYMPIC HIGH SCHOOL PTSA: $2,500 · OtherPACIFIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherBREMERTON YACHT CLUB: $2,500 · OtherKLAHOWYA SECONDARY SCHOOLS: $1,980 · Other+8 more: $7,500 · Other+8 moreKCMS FOUNDATION: $16,500 · EducationKCMS FOUNDATIONUC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationUC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDA…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTO…MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 · AnimalsMAUI HUMA…Mat Valley Kitties & Puppies Rescue Inc: $2,500 · AnimalsMat Valle…LANAI CAT SANCTUARY: $2,500 · AnimalsLANAI CAT…BRIGHT LIGHTS BOOK PROJECT: $2,500 · EnvironmentKIHEI CANOE CLUB: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsTED BROWN MUSIC OUTREACH: $2,500 · Arts & CultureKEITH HUDSON MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 · Religion
Other$54,480Education$18,500Animals$8,000Environment$2,500Recreation & Sports$2,500Arts & Culture$2,500Religion$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKCMS FOUNDATION: $16,500 over 5y, 18% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLANAI CAT SANCTUARY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACIFIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBREMERTON YACHT CLUB: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRIGHT LIGHTS BOOK PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTED BROWN MUSIC OUTREACH: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetKEITH HUDSON MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetKITSAP RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA DELTA PI FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hutchinson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hutchinson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hutchinson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home