· Private foundation
Hutchinson Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN | $10,000 |
| YMCA | $2,600 |
| MAT VALLEY KITTIES AND PUPPIES RESCUE INC | $2,500 |
| KCMS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| BRIGHT LIGHTS BOOK PROJECT | $2,500 |
| KIHEI CANOE CLUB | $2,500 |
| PACIFIC CANCER FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| KCMS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| UCSB FOUNDATION PARENTS FUND | $1,000 |
| KLAHOWYA SECONDARY SCHOOLS | $990 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OLOLYMPIC LUTHERHAVEN5× · 2021–2025 · $19k
- KFKCMS FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $17k · revenue +55%
- YPYMCA PIERCE & KITSAP COUNTIES3× · 2021–2023 · $7k
Funded once
- SMST MICHAEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $4k
- BYBREMERTON YACHT CLUBone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +11%
- OHOLYMPIC HIGH SCHOOL PTSAone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The org's mission is to rescue, nurture, and relocate at-risk animals in the ca central valley.
To slow down and stop the overpopulation of unwanted pets on the kenai peninsula
To save Hawaii Kitties by providing critical care and services that transform these sick, injured, tortured, and abused cats/kittens into a placeable position. The success of the cat/kitten placement has been enhanced by the non-profit…
To prevent cruelty to animals
The mission of kuakini foundation is to improve the health status of the community by: providing comprehensive health care services and programs at reasonable cost; continuously improving the quality of health care services and programs;…
To benefit the university of california santa cruz.
Protection and conservation of the environment and ecosystems of the west maui mountains through restoration and conservation projects.
To provide a safety net for Kauai's homeless pets that cannot be assisted through existing Island Rescue efforts.
The Kona Brewers Festival is a potent blend of craft beer, Hawaiian culture and charitable support. This beloved event brings beer enthusiasts and the community together while raising money for impactful causes focusing on conservation,…
The mission of the hawaii island humane society is to prevent cruelty to animals, eliminate pet over population, and enhance the bond between humans and animals.
Resolve the homeless cat problem on kauai.
Health & welfare of abandonded & homeless cats
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kitsap Rescue Mission and the most unlike its peers is Mat Valley Kitties & Puppies Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KCMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT LIGHTS BOOK PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BREMERTON YACHT CLUB ↗
- Who funds LANAI CAT SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds KEITH HUDSON MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds TED BROWN MUSIC OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds Mat Valley Kitties & Puppies Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds KIHEI CANOE CLUB ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KITSAP RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds ALPHA DELTA PI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hutchinson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.