Skip to content

· Public charity

Hutchinson County United Way Inc

The organization conducts an annual fundraising campaign to collect and disburse the funds to not-for-profit agencies approved for support by the board.

$369k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.5MYouth Development$441kReligion$372kHealth$346kCrime & Legal$290kEducation$103kCivil Rights$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $359,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $368,720 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,420 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $225k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $128k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$899k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUTCHINSON CO CRISIS CENTER$66,240
BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC$62,000
LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC$41,500
FRIENDS OF DRUG COURT$40,000
OPPORTUNITIES INC$33,520
SALVATION ARMY$30,000
BORGER AREA LEARNING CENTER$26,000
AMARILLO AREA CASA INC$20,000
GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS$12,040
THE BRIDGE$12,000
STEPPING STONES$10,000
JERRY WAGGONER FOUNDATION$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $37k → 9%CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $33k → 9%CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $11k → 9%CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $8k → 9%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $68k → 12%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $66k → 12%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $66k → 12%THE BRIDGE: $17k → 20%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $65k → 12%THE BRIDGE: $14k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $13k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $12k → 20%THE BRIDGE: $12k → 20%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $62k → 12%THE BRIDGE: $12k → 20%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $62k → 12%THE BRIDGE: $11k → 20%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $62k → 12%THE BRIDGE: $9k → 20%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $62k → 12%THE BRIDGE: $9k → 20%BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $60k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $50k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $46k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $44k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $43k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $42k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $42k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $42k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $39k → 12%LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $14k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 20 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$4.1M
$40k

Still filing today

45%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $572k · revenue +22%
  • HP
    HIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $506k · revenue +142% · 99% of their budget
  • LW
    LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $362k · revenue +19% · 54% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $24k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • C2
    CENSUS 2020
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Battered Women's Center Inc

Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.

Human Services
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates Casa of Liberty/Chambers Counties

None

Human Services
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Brazoria County Counseling Center Inc

Brazoria County Counseling Center, Inc. assures and provides access to Mental and Substance Abuse services and support to meet the mental health needs of all ages. BCCC ensures effective and culturally competent care to empower families to…

—
5
Court Appointed Special Advocates in the Heart of Texas

Training and supporting quality volunteers who speak out for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court in an effort to find each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
6
Bluebonnet Childrens Center

To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.

Crime & Legal
7
Big Country Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Big country casa recruits, trains, and supervises community volunteers who are appointed by judges to represent and advocate for the best interest of abused and neglected children in the cps system in taylor county, texas.

Crime & Legal
8
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Milam County
—
9
Casa for Kids of South Central Texas Inc

To recruit, train and supervise volunteers that advocate in the best interests of abused and neglected children in court.

Housing & Shelter
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
11
Court Appointed Special Advocates of North Texas Inc

To provide abused children with trained, court appointed volunteers who investigate, monitor and serve as advocates to help them secure a permanent and safe residence.

—
12
Boys Club of Brazos County Inc

Service to youth

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge; the most unlike its peers is Biblical Wellness Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUTCHINSON CO CRISIS CENTER: $610,361 · OtherHUTCHINSON CO CRISIS CENTERHIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC: $505,605 · OtherHIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INCGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $293,457 · OtherGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAThe Salvation Army: $278,071 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyOPPORTUNITIES INC: $248,823 · OtherOPPORTUNITIES INCBORGER SATELLITE ADVISORY BOARD INC: $202,168 · OtherBORGER SATELLITE ADVISORY BOARD INCFRIENDS OF DRUG COURT: $181,204 · OtherFRIENDS OF DRUG COURTBACK TO SCHOOL FAIR: $111,213 · OtherBIBLICAL WELLNESS CENTER: $106,637 · OtherJERRY C WAGGONER MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $102,689 · Other+8 more: $301,220 · Other+8 moreBUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $572,345 · Human ServicesBUTTERCUP HOUSE INCLIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $361,940 · Human ServicesLIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INCTHE BRIDGE: $108,707 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGECCS CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $88,627 · Human ServicesCCS CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICESAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $60,500 · Civil RightsGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC: $36,750 · Youth Development
Other$2,941,448Human Services$1,131,619Civil Rights$60,500Youth Development$36,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUTTERCUP HOUSE INC: $572,345 over 9y, 11% of budgetHIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC: $505,605 over 8y, 99% of budgetLIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC: $361,940 over 9y, 54% of budgetGOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $293,457 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INC: $248,823 over 9y, 30% of budgetBORGER SATELLITE ADVISORY BOARD INC: $202,168 over 9y, 94% of budgetTHE BRIDGE: $108,707 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetBIBLICAL WELLNESS CENTER: $106,637 over 2y, 88% of budgetCCS CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES: $88,627 over 4y, 25% of budgetAMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC: $60,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC: $36,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BORGER SATELLITE ADVISORY BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds BIBLICAL WELLNESS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CCS CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amarillo Area Foundation IncTX19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Pampa United Way Inc · Kimble Foundation Trust · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hutchinson County United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hutchinson County United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hutchinson County United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph