· Public charity
Hutchinson County United Way Inc
The organization conducts an annual fundraising campaign to collect and disburse the funds to not-for-profit agencies approved for support by the board.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $359,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $368,720 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,420 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $225k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $128k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HUTCHINSON CO CRISIS CENTER | $66,240 |
| BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC | $62,000 |
| LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC | $41,500 |
| FRIENDS OF DRUG COURT | $40,000 |
| OPPORTUNITIES INC | $33,520 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $30,000 |
| BORGER AREA LEARNING CENTER | $26,000 |
| AMARILLO AREA CASA INC | $20,000 |
| GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS | $12,040 |
| THE BRIDGE | $12,000 |
| STEPPING STONES | $10,000 |
| JERRY WAGGONER FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBUTTERCUP HOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $572k · revenue +22%
- HPHIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $506k · revenue +50% · 99% of their budget
- LWLIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $362k · revenue +19% · 54% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $24k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $10k
- C2CENSUS 2020one grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.
Brazoria County Counseling Center, Inc. assures and provides access to Mental and Substance Abuse services and support to meet the mental health needs of all ages. BCCC ensures effective and culturally competent care to empower families to…
Service to youth
Big country casa recruits, trains, and supervises community volunteers who are appointed by judges to represent and advocate for the best interest of abused and neglected children in the cps system in taylor county, texas.
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
Training and supporting quality volunteers who speak out for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court in an effort to find each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.
To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.
Life skills and employment training
Assisting in the growth and development of the College Station community in the areas of employment health care housing and counseling.
None
To recruit, train and supervise volunteers that advocate in the best interests of abused and neglected children in court.
To provide abused children with trained, court appointed volunteers who investigate, monitor and serve as advocates to help them secure a permanent and safe residence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge and the most unlike its peers is Biblical Wellness Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUTTERCUP HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH PLAINS HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING WATER BENEVOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD COUNCIL INC 562 OF THE BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BORGER SATELLITE ADVISORY BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds BIBLICAL WELLNESS CENTER ↗
- Who funds CCS CONNECT COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds AMARILLO AREA COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Mary E Bivins Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Josephine Anderson Charitable Trust · Pampa United Way Inc · Kimble Foundation Trust · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · High Plains Christian Ministries Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hutchinson County United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.