Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Husain Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$273k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$83k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$455kHealth$175kEnvironment$143kHuman Services$65kFood & Nutrition$30kReligion$25kEmployment$20kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $188k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVANSTON SCHOLARS$83,333
INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$55,000
CAMP CATANESE FDN$50,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
WINE TO WATER$25,000
FOOTHILLS FOOD BANK$10,000
HILLSIDE FOOD PANTRY$5,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$5,000
SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE$5,000
ETHS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $75k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$767k · 11 repeat orgs$255k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$767k
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+40%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentEmploymentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EVANSTON SCHOLARS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $255k · revenue +35%
  • WT
    Wine to Water
    6× · 2019–2024 · $143k · revenue +312%
  • ET
    EVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 202 ED FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +671%

Funded once

  • VP
    VALLEY PROFESSIONALS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +32%
  • MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue +40%
  • INNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +270%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Evanston Community Foundation

The evanston community foundation mobilizes community resources to drive systemic social change and build a thriving, resilient evanston. we achieve this by: investing in community with a long-term and sustainable perspective, empowering…

Philanthropy
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
4
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

5
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
6
Executive Service Corps of Chicago

Executive Service Corps is the premier nonprofit consultancy that engages highly skilled professionals who use their experience and expertise to provide nonprofits with the consulting services they need to be successful. Our vision is to…

Community Improvement
7
The International Student Exchange Programs

Isep empowers higher education institutions to expand the perspectives and potential of students around the world through our wide range of accessible, authentic academic intercultural programs.

International
8
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
9
Goodwill Industries of the Valley Works

Goodwill's mission is to empower individuals, strengthen families, and inspire communities through job skills training and work placement opportunities with a multi-generational approach focused on removing barriers.

Human Services
10
Foundry Educational Foundation Dba Fef

Foundry educational foundation strenghtens the metal casting industry by supporting unique partnerships among students, educators, and industry, helping today's students become tomorrow's leaders.

11
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
12
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evanston Scholars and the most unlike its peers is Wine to Water. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EVANSTON SCHOLARS — $254,999 · EducationEVANSTON SCHOLARSIndiana State University Foundation Inc — $120,000 · EducationIndiana State University Foundation IncCAMP CATANESE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationCAMP CATANESE FOUNDATIONEVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 202 ED FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationEVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 202 ED FOUN…Individual grant recipient — $107,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…THE MORAN CENTER — $40,000 · OtherTHE MORAN CENTERSISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS — $25,000 · OtherSISTERS OF PROVIDENCE…Foothills Food Bank — $10,000 · OtherHILLSIDE FOOD PANTRY — $9,368 · OtherWine to Water — $143,373 · EnvironmentWine to WaterVALLEY PROFESSIONALS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $100,000 · HealthVALLEY PROF…MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEB…BACK ON MY FEET — $25,000 · Human ServicesBACK ON MY …INNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EmploymentGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $10,500 · Food & NutritionWOMEN FOR EVANSTON YOUTH — $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$454,999Other$191,368Environment$143,373Health$100,000Human Services$100,000Employment$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,500Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEVANSTON SCHOLARS — $254,999 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetWine to Water — $143,373 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetIndiana State University Foundation Inc — $120,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVALLEY PROFESSIONALS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP CATANESE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetEVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 202 ED FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoothills Food Bank — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN FOR EVANSTON YOUTH — $2,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Husain Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph