Skip to content
Human-Animal Alliance Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Human-Animal Alliance Inc

The mission of the human-animal alliance is to directly support programs that share our belief in the power and value of human-animal connection.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Animals$300kHealth$29kHuman Services$26kYouth Development$23k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$16,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$779k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWS OF WAR$30,000
PASADENA HUMANE$25,000
PHILLY GOAT PROJECT$17,500
TOMORROW'S RAINBOW$16,000
PAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS$16,000
CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY$15,700
PAWS NY$15,000
CROSSROADS CORRAL$12,000
WORK TO RIDE$10,500
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER'S INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN-ANIMAL CONNECTION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INSPIRATION RANCH: $10k → 9%CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY: $16k → 13%BEAUTIFUL TOGETHER SANCTUARY: $15k → 9%PAWS4PEOPLE INC: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
CA
CO
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws Need People

Paws need people strive to rescue pets from shelters and provide a place they can stay until they are adopted. they provide pets to veterans through its therapy pet program.

—
2
Pet Helpers
Animals
3
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
4
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
5
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
6
Hopeful Tails Rescue

Our purpose is to make a positive impact on the lives of animals by rescuing, rehabilitating, and finding them loving homes or providing them sanctuary. Through education and advocacy, we strive to foster responsible ownership and ensure…

Animals
7
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
8
Dogs Unbroken

Dog Rescue Dogs Unbroken supports Colorado dogs at higher risk for euthanasia evaluating their behavioral stability and applying training methods appropriate for their needs. The goal of helping each dog learn to make good choices in…

Animals
9
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
10
Where the Wild Things Are Rescue in

The rescue and rehabilitation of canines.

Animals
11
Giving Paw Inc

Animal care

Animals
12
Pats Pets Corporation

Animal rescue

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspiration Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tomorrow's Rainbow Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
8/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PACT: $30,000 · AnimalsPACTPAWS OF WAR INC: $30,000 · AnimalsPAWS OF WAR INCPAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS: $26,000 · AnimalsPAWSITIVE BEGINNINGSHARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · AnimalsHARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATIONPASADENA HUMANE: $25,000 · AnimalsPASADENA HUMANERanch Hands Rescue: $20,000 · AnimalsRanch Hands RescuePhilly Goat Project Inc: $17,500 · AnimalsPhilly Goat Project IncPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS: $15,000 · AnimalsPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWSLost Pet Services Inc: $15,000 · AnimalsLost Pet Services IncThe Street Dog Coalition: $10,000 · AnimalsPAWSTER NASHVILLE: $10,000 · AnimalsPAWS4PEOPLE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesPAWS4PEOPLE INCCANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC: $15,700 · Human ServicesCANINE ASSISTED THE…BEAUTIFUL TOGETHER: $15,000 · Human ServicesBEAUTIFUL TOGETHERINSPIRATION RANCH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesINSPIRATION RANCH I…TOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC: $29,000 · HealthTOMORROW'S RA…HOPE REINS: $16,000 · HealthHOPE REINSWORK TO RIDE INC: $10,500 · OtherWOMEN FOR PAWS INC: $10,000 · OtherCROSSROADS CORRAL INC: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $10,000 · Education
Animals$223,500Human Services$65,700Health$45,000Other$20,500Youth Development$12,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACT: $30,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC: $29,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS: $26,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetPAWS4PEOPLE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRanch Hands Rescue: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE REINS: $16,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC: $15,700 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBEAUTIFUL TOGETHER: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLost Pet Services Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetThe Street Dog Coalition: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetINSPIRATION RANCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPAWSTER NASHVILLE: $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Duffield Family F…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …
The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's FundCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Human-Animal Alliance Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Human-Animal Alliance Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Human-Animal Alliance Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Human-Animal Alliance Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Human-Animal Alliance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home