Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Human-Animal Alliance Inc

The mission of the human-animal alliance is to directly support programs that share our belief in the power and value of human-animal connection.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Animals$300kHealth$29kHuman Services$26kYouth Development$23k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$16,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$779k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWS OF WAR$30,000
PASADENA HUMANE$25,000
PHILLY GOAT PROJECT$17,500
TOMORROW'S RAINBOW$16,000
PAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS$16,000
CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY$15,700
PAWS NY$15,000
CROSSROADS CORRAL$12,000
WORK TO RIDE$10,500
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER'S INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN-ANIMAL CONNECTION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INSPIRATION RANCH: $10k → 9%CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY: $16k → 13%BEAUTIFUL TOGETHER SANCTUARY: $15k → 9%PAWS4PEOPLE INC: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
CA
CO
TN
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws Need People

Paws need people strive to rescue pets from shelters and provide a place they can stay until they are adopted. they provide pets to veterans through its therapy pet program.

2
Pet Helpers
Animals
3
Happy Acres Pet Rescue
Animals
4
2nd Chance Ranch and Rescue

Sanctuary for abused or abandoned animals

Animals
5
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
6
Hopeful Tails Rescue

Our purpose is to make a positive impact on the lives of animals by rescuing, rehabilitating, and finding them loving homes or providing them sanctuary. Through education and advocacy, we strive to foster responsible ownership and ensure…

Animals
7
Platte Ranch Forever Home Sanctuary
Animals
8
Dogs Unbroken

Dog Rescue Dogs Unbroken supports Colorado dogs at higher risk for euthanasia evaluating their behavioral stability and applying training methods appropriate for their needs. The goal of helping each dog learn to make good choices in…

Animals
9
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
10
Where the Wild Things Are Rescue in

The rescue and rehabilitation of canines.

Animals
11
Giving Paw Inc

Animal care

Animals
12
Pats Pets Corporation

Animal rescue

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspiration Ranch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tomorrow's Rainbow Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%24%5–10yr19%52%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%53%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
7/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PACT — $30,000 · AnimalsPACTPAWS OF WAR INC — $30,000 · AnimalsPAWS OF WAR INCPAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS — $26,000 · AnimalsPAWSITIVE BEGINNINGSHARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · AnimalsHARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATIONPASADENA HUMANE — $25,000 · AnimalsPASADENA HUMANERanch Hands Rescue — $20,000 · AnimalsRanch Hands RescuePhilly Goat Project Inc — $17,500 · AnimalsPhilly Goat Project IncPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS — $15,000 · AnimalsPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWSLost Pet Services Inc — $15,000 · AnimalsLost Pet Services IncThe Street Dog Coalition — $10,000 · AnimalsPAWSTER NASHVILLE — $10,000 · AnimalsPAWS4PEOPLE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesPAWS4PEOPLE INCCANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC — $15,700 · Human ServicesCANINE ASSISTED THE…BEAUTIFUL TOGETHER — $15,000 · Human ServicesBEAUTIFUL TOGETHERINSPIRATION RANCH INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesINSPIRATION RANCH I…TOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC — $29,000 · HealthTOMORROW'S RA…HOPE REINS — $16,000 · HealthHOPE REINSWORK TO RIDE INC — $10,500 · OtherWOMEN FOR PAWS INC — $10,000 · OtherCROSSROADS CORRAL INC — $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $10,000 · Education
Animals$223,500Human Services$65,700Health$45,000Other$20,500Youth Development$12,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPACT — $30,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetTOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC — $29,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS — $26,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetPAWS4PEOPLE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRanch Hands Rescue — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE REINS — $16,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC — $15,700 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBEAUTIFUL TOGETHER — $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS — $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLost Pet Services Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRATION RANCH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Street Dog Coalition — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPAWSTER NASHVILLE — $10,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's FundCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Human-Animal Alliance Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Human-Animal Alliance Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Human-Animal Alliance Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph