Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hugh a Wyatt & Jean P Wyatt Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$122kInternational$91kHuman Services$77kEducation$64kHealth$28kPublic Safety & Disaster$9kPublic Benefit$3k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Amridge University$7,000
Christian Relief Fund$7,000
SUNSET INTL BIBLE INSTITUTE$6,000
Eastern Eurpean Missions$4,000
Mision Para Cristo$3,000
Agape of Central Alabama$3,000
Hillcrest church of Christ$3,000
Upstate church of Christ$3,000
Rainbow Omega$3,000
Childhaven Childrens Home$2,500
Womens Care Medical Center$2,000
Allegro Organizational Solutions$2,000
Fairfax church of Christ$2,000
Extra Special People$2,000
Bayside Church$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Mision Para Cristo: $3k → 16%Rainbow Omega: $4k → 18%Mision Para Cristo: $3k → 16%Rainbow Omega: $3k → 18%Mision Para Cristo: $2k → 16%Rainbow Omega: $3k → 18%Mision Para Cristo: $2k → 16%RAINBOW OMEGA: $3k → 18%Rainbow Omega: $2k → 18%RAINBOW OMEGA: $2k → 18%RAINBOW OMEGA: $2k → 18%Rainbow Omega: $2k → 18%RAINBOW OMEGA: $1k → 18%Agape of Central Alabama: $4k → 18%Agape of Central Alabama: $3k → 18%Agape of Central Alabama: $3k → 18%AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $3k → 18%Agape of Central Alabama: $2k → 18%AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $2k → 18%AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $2k → 18%Agape of Central Alabama: $2k → 18%AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
VA
AR
TN
NC
SC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$375k · 19 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$375k
$18k

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AMRIDGE UNIVERSITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +12%
  • TC
    THE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +69%
  • AO
    AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • GC
    GRAPEVINE CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CH
    Central Haywood church of Christ
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • HM
    Hellenic Ministries
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
2
Childcare Worldwide

Childcare Worldwide (CW) transforms children's lives by exposing them to the gospel of Jesus Christ, providing for their physical needs, and sponsoring their education. We connect sponsors with children through Christ-based life centers.…

International
3
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
4
Orphan Outreach

To glorify the Lord Jesus Christ by ministering to orphans around the world by meeting spiritual, physical, emotional, and educational needs.

International
5
Agape Impact Ministries Inc

The organization provides shelter and care for orphaned children in the Philippines that were orphaned, abandoned, abused or neglected.

Religion
6
Children of Promise International

Children of promise international is a nonprofit organization providing humanitarian aid, relief and development in approximately 7 countries for the purpose of caring for orphans, widows, and destitute children and outreach to the poor…

—
7
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

—
8
Chosen Children Ministries Inc

To provide relief and aid in the name of christ to children and adults in nicaragua.

Human Services
9
African Children's Mission Inc

Reaching out to children in east africa living in destitute circumstances, both physically and with the gospel of jesus christ, to enable them to grow and develop in a secure environment.

Religion
10
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
11
Water By Women

Provide state of the art water filters into the hands of mothers and train them to provide clean water for themselves , their families and others in their communities.

Human Services
12
Fountains of Hope International Inc

Fountains of Hope is committed to serving God by providing safe water and community needs in developing countries and in disaster relief areas worldwide.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Churches of Christ Disaster Relief Effort Inc; the most unlike its peers is Extra Special People Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPANISH FORT CHURCH OF CHRIST: $38,000 · OtherSPANISH FORT CHURCH OF CHRISTCHILDHAVEN INC: $21,500 · OtherCHILDHAVEN INCExtra Special People Inc: $18,000 · OtherExtra Special People IncEastern Eurpean Missions: $16,000 · OtherEastern Eurpean MissionsUPSTATE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $15,000 · OtherUPSTATE CHURCH OF CHRISTHILLCREST CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13,000 · OtherHILLCREST CHURCH OF CHRISTFAIRFAX CHURCH OF CHRIST: $13,000 · OtherFAIRFAX CHURCH OF CHRISTGRAPEVINE CHURCH OF CHRIST: $10,000 · OtherGRAPEVINE CHURCH OF CHRISTSUNSET INTERNATIONAL BIBLE INSTITUTE INC: $7,500 · Other+4 more: $12,000 · Other+4 moreTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $58,000 · InternationalTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUN…HEALING HANDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $19,000 · InternationalHEALING HANDS INTERNATIO…ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $8,000 · InternationalALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL S…AMRIDGE UNIVERSITY INC: $63,500 · EducationAMRIDGE UNIVERSITY…AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $23,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE OF CENTRA…RAINBOW OMEGA INC: $22,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW OMEGA I…Mision Para Cristo Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesMision Para Cri…CHURCHES OF CHRIST DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT INC: $8,750 · ReligionMETRO MINISTRIES OF MOBILE INC: $6,000 · ReligionWOMENS CARE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Other$164,000International$85,000Education$63,500Human Services$55,000Religion$14,750Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMRIDGE UNIVERSITY INC: $63,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND: $58,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $23,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetRAINBOW OMEGA INC: $22,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDHAVEN INC: $21,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHEALING HANDS INTERNATIONAL INC: $19,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetExtra Special People Inc: $18,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWOMENS CARE MEDICAL CENTER INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMision Para Cristo Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHURCHES OF CHRIST DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT INC: $8,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO MINISTRIES OF MOBILE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMRIDGE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN RELIEF FUND ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW OMEGA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HANDS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Extra Special People Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS CARE MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Mision Para Cristo Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHES OF CHRIST DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds METRO MINISTRIES OF MOBILE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX16× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hugh a Wyatt & Jean P Wyatt Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hugh a Wyatt & Jean P Wyatt Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hugh a Wyatt & Jean P Wyatt Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hugh a Wyatt & Jean P Wyatt Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hugh a Wyatt & Jean P Wyatt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph