Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Howard a Cook Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$31k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Religion$85kYouth Development$76kArts & Culture$52kEducation$51kHealth$10k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $117k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM$31,400
CHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF ST MAARTEN$30,000
PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE$20,000
CONGREGATION SHIRAT HAYAM OF THE NORTH SHORE$15,000
THE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC$11,000
BROOKWOOD SCHOOL INCORPORATED$10,000
FAIRWIND LEARNING CENTER$5,000
LAPPIN FOUNDATION$5,000
YESTERMORROW INC$5,000
CHABAD OF PEABODY JEWISH CENTER$3,600
FRIENDS OF YOUNG JUDAEA INC (DBA CAMP YJ)$3,600
CHABAD OF THE NORTH SHORE$2,500
MAYYIM HAYYIM LIVING WATERS COMMUNITY MIKVEH & EDUCATION CENTER INC$1,800
CHABAD CENTER OF BROOKLINE$1,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $56k → 10%PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$209k · 9 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$209k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $52k · revenue +32%
  • BROOKWOOD SCHOOL INCORPORATED
    2× · 2024–2025 · $23k · revenue +7%
  • TC
    THE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CF
    CHANGING FUTURES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
2
Creative Minds International Public Charter School

The mission of the charter school is to cultivate within all of our students the mindset, skills, creativity, and commitment to equity essential in becoming globally aware and independently minded citizens.

Education
3
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

4
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
5
Sycamore Schools Inc

Sycamore School exists so that academically gifted children can experience the enriched, accelerated education they need to reach their potential and lead responsible, constructive, fulfilling lives.

Education
6
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
7
Shalom School

Shalom school's mission is to provide each child with an outstanding education in a nurturing environment that is academically excellent, inclusive, innovative, and inspired by jewish values and traditions.

8
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
9
Pine Cobble School Incorporated

Provide private school education for children from nursery school through grade 8

Education
10
Brixham Montessori Friends School

Brixham montessori friends school (bmfs) honors each child's individuality, creativity, and intellectual potential through enriched montessori educational programs.

Education
11
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
12
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fairwind Learning Center and the most unlike its peers is Changing Futures Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC — $76,000 · Human ServicesPLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INCCHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF ST MAARTEN — $30,000 · OtherCHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF ST MAARTENCONGREGATION SHIRAT HAYAM OF THE NORTH SHORE — $15,000 · OtherCONGREGATION SHIRAT HAYAM OF TH…CHABAD OF PEABODY JEWISH CENTER — $10,400 · OtherCHABAD OF PEABODY JEWISH CENTERCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE NORTH SHORE — $7,500 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE NORTH S…CHABAD CENTER OF BROOKLINE MA — $6,800 · OtherCHABAD CENTER OF BROOKLINE MAFRIENDS OF YOUNG JUDAEA INC (DBA CAMP YJ) — $3,600 · Other+1 more — $1,800 · OtherPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC — $52,300 · Arts & CulturePEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INCCHANGING FUTURES INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHANGING FUTURES INCYestermorrow Inc — $10,000 · Arts & CultureYestermorrow IncBROOKWOOD SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $22,650 · EducationBROOKWOOD SCHOOL…THE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC — $13,000 · EducationTHE CHARLES RIVE…FAIRWIND LEARNING CENTER — $5,000 · EducationFAIRWIND LEARNIN…LAPPIN FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Religion
Human Services$76,000Other$75,100Arts & Culture$72,300Education$40,650Religion$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC — $76,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC — $52,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKWOOD SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $22,650 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC — $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAPPIN FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHANGING FUTURES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetYestermorrow Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAIRWIND LEARNING CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLUMMER YOUTH PROMISE INC
  • Who funds PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds BROOKWOOD SCHOOL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE CHARLES RIVER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds LAPPIN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHANGING FUTURES INC
  • Who funds Yestermorrow Inc
  • Who funds FAIRWIND LEARNING CENTER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Howard a Cook Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 64%
  • Plummer Youth Promise Inc64% of income from government
  • Peabody Essex Museum Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph