Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hope Through Life Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$102kInternational$85kHealth$66kHuman Services$50kYouth Development$35kEmployment$30kArts & Culture$27kReligion$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REALITY MINISTRIES$11,000
FRIENDS OF MUKHANYO$10,000
BRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP$10,000
MISSION FIJI$5,000
SKJAJA FUNDYOUTHWORKS ON MAIN$5,000
FULLER CENTER HOUSING OF UTAH COUNTY$5,000
EXPERIENCE REALITY INC$5,000
MAKER UNION$5,000
MIRACLEFEET$5,000
YOUNG LIFE PARK CITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SISU ADULT GROWTH: $5k → 8%SISU ADULT GROWTH: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$400k · 15 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$400k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+91%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthReligionInternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $92k · revenue +96% · 32% of their budget
  • M
    MIRACLEFEET
    5× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +114%
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • SB
    SIDE BY SIDE SPOKANE
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • TF
    THRIVEWORX FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +158%
  • PC
    PARK CITY YOUNG LIFE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Unify Ministries
Religion
2
Thrive Church Planting
Religion
3
Raise Up Global Ministries

Raise Up Global Ministries is committed to educating Christian leaders in communities around the world. The three programs of Raise Up equip the global church by 1 Developing biblically based interactive materials and 2 Training…

—
4
Transform Ministries
—
5
Christian Foundation
—
6
The Trinity Foundation
—
7
Upreach Ministry International Inc
—
8
Triveni Institute
Environment
9
Paradigm Shift

Paradigm Shift equips churches to empower entrepreneurs in the developing world. Over 25,000 entrepreneurs from 25 different African nations have been impacted.

International
10
Transform African Ministries

To make disciples and empower them for transformation in Jesus name. The transformation is on three levels: spiritual social and econmic.

International
11
The Pathway International
Philanthropy
12
Revelation Enterprise
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sisu Adult Growth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP: $92,000 · HealthBRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORPMIRACLEFEET: $35,000 · HealthMIRACLEFEETIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSIDE BY SIDE SPOKANE: $20,000 · OtherSIDE BY SIDE SPOKANETURNING POINT USA INC: $15,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCYOUNG LIFE PARK CITY: $10,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE PARK CITYFULLER CENTER HOUSING OF UTAH COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherFULLER CENTER HOUSING OF UTAH…PARK CITY YOUNG LIFE: $10,000 · OtherPARK CITY YOUNG LIFEYOUNG LIFE IMPACTING HEARTS: $10,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE IMPACTING HEARTSMAKER UNION: $10,000 · OtherMAKER UNIONSISU ADULT GROWTH: $10,000 · OtherSISU ADULT GROWTHTHE FOUNDATION: $65,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATIONUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FOUNDAT…Academy31 Inc: $5,000 · EducationAcademy31 IncCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $30,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN CE…EXPERIENCE REALITY INC: $20,000 · ReligionEXPERIENCE R…REALITY MINISTRIES INC: $26,000 · Youth DevelopmentREALITY MI…SKJAJA Fund: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentSKJAJA Fun…OUR RESCUE: $27,000 · Arts & CultureMISSION FIJI: $10,000 · InternationalTHRIVEWORX FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · International
Health$127,000Other$120,000Education$75,000Religion$50,000Youth Development$41,000Arts & Culture$27,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP: $92,000 over 4y, 32% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetMIRACLEFEET: $35,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $27,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREALITY MINISTRIES INC: $26,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEXPERIENCE REALITY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKJAJA Fund: $15,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetMISSION FIJI: $10,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetMAKER UNION: $10,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetTHRIVEWORX FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSISU ADULT GROWTH: $10,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAcademy31 Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLEFEET ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds REALITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE REALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SKJAJA Fund ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FIJI ↗
  • Who funds MAKER UNION ↗
  • Who funds THRIVEWORX FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SISU ADULT GROWTH ↗
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Academy31 Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kenan Family FoundationNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kenan Family Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope Through Life Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope Through Life Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hope Through Life Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Hope Through Life Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hope Through Life’s filings →

    More from the funding graph