Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Kenan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$395k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$581kHealth$335kReligion$331kHousing & Shelter$321kArts & Culture$194kFood & Nutrition$97kEnvironment$79kEmployment$69kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $335k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGE 21 PARK CITY CORP$50,000
TRINITY SCHOOL$40,000
UNC AT WILMINGTON FOUNDATION$35,000
SINGING ON GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN$30,000
ST STEPHENS EPSICOPAL CHURCH$25,000
DUPLIN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION$25,000
CANAL ALLIANCE$25,000
COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES$20,000
GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION$15,000
SF MARIN FOOD BANK$15,000
ST STEPHENS EPSICOPAL CHURCH$15,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$15,000
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NC$15,000
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NC$10,000
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 10%COMMONWEAL: $5k → 8%COMMONWEAL: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 33 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
12

Total granted

$2.1M
$90k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+14%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $200k · revenue +368% · 28% of their budget
  • CA
    CANAL ALLIANCE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +80%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $24k
  • CF
    CAROLINA FRIENDS SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +27%
  • AS
    Agnes Scott College
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute of Integral Studies

Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…

Education
2
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
5
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

6
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
7
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
8
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
12
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carolina Friends School and the most unlike its peers is Sisu Adult Growth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-8 SchoolsLand Conservation Organizat…Native Hawaiian Community D…Affordable Housing Developm…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Food Pantries & AssistanceDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Sports Booster Organi…Community Arts OrganizationsAffordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Public University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%7%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr14%10%20–35yr12%17%35–55yr12%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%3%<5yr16%17%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr14%9%20–35yr12%23%35–55yr12%31%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
15%
7,957/53,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
23/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUPLIN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION — $228,000 · OtherDUPLIN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATIONUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NC — $136,000 · OtherUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION OF NCUNC AT WILMINGTON FOUNDATION — $136,000 · OtherUNC AT WILMINGTON FOUNDATIONSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $88,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKSEEDS — $80,000 · OtherSEEDSST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $71,000 · OtherST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCHDUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — $60,000 · OtherCAROLINA PERFORMING ARTS — $55,000 · OtherSINGING ON GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN — $45,000 · OtherNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $60,000 · Other+23 more — $357,000 · Other+23 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY — $110,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTrinity School Inc — $105,000 · EducationTrinity School …UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FOUN…The Thacher School Inc — $15,000 · EducationBRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP — $200,000 · HealthBRIDGE21 PA…CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN — $8,000 · HealthCANAL ALLIANCE — $115,000 · ReligionCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $65,000 · Human ServicesCOMMONWEAL — $10,000 · Human ServicesSISU ADULT GROWTH — $5,000 · Human ServicesGRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · EnvironmentLEARNING OUTSIDE INC — $3,000 · EnvironmentREALITY MINISTRIES INC — $61,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,316,000Education$285,000Health$208,000Religion$115,000Human Services$80,000Environment$78,000Youth Development$61,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP — $200,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE — $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $110,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity School Inc — $105,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $88,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetREALITY MINISTRIES INC — $61,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $60,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXTRAORDINARY VENTURES — $43,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DOCUMENTARY STUDIES — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMarin City Community Development Corporation — $27,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMAKER UNION — $26,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Orange County NC Inc — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC — $18,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Thacher School Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArts For Life — $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCAROLINA FRIENDS SCHOOL — $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAgnes Scott College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMONWEAL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HENRY MORRISON FLAGLER MUSEUM INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMIT COMMUNITY GARDENS AND EATS — $9,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetJUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN — $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSISU ADULT GROWTH — $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLEARNING OUTSIDE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIDGE21 PARK CITY CORP
  • Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Trinity School Inc
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
  • Who funds GRANDFATHER MOUNTAIN STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds REALITY MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER
  • Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds EXTRAORDINARY VENTURES
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR DOCUMENTARY STUDIES
  • Who funds Marin City Community Development Corporation
  • Who funds MAKER UNION
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity Orange County NC Inc
  • Who funds THE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC
  • Who funds The Thacher School Inc
  • Who funds Arts For Life
  • Who funds CAROLINA FRIENDS SCHOOL
  • Who funds Agnes Scott College
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE
  • Who funds COMMONWEAL
  • Who funds THE HENRY MORRISON FLAGLER MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds SUMMIT COMMUNITY GARDENS AND EATS
  • Who funds JUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds SISU ADULT GROWTH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · The Thomas S Kenan III Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Hope Through Life Foundation · Strowd Roses Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Kenan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Kenan Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Kenan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph