Skip to content
Hope for Living Water Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Hope for Living Water Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$405kInternational$195kHuman Services$116kRecreation & Sports$100kHealth$95kFood & Nutrition$40kArts & Culture$25kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH$40,000
SCV PREGANANCY CENTER$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS$20,000
SESPE CREEK BIBLE CHURCH$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $20k → 19%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$766k · 10 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$766k
$170k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+40%

Still filing today

30%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SCV PREGNANCY CENTER
    4× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +30%
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k · revenue +16%
  • ZI
    ZOE INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • CC
    CROSSROADS COMMUNITY CHURCH OFSANTA CLARITA VALLEY
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • SC
    SANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -36%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +106%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
5
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
9
Fh Association

Fh association is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that designs, develops and delivers solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on schedule…

Philanthropy
10
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding Hungry Children International

Provide food, shelter, and medical assistance for children around the world.

—
12
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arrowhead Ranch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH INC: $230,000 · OtherGRACE BAPTIST CHURCH INCArrowhead Ranch Inc: $100,000 · OtherArrowhead Ranch IncSESPE CREEK BIBLE CHURCH: $90,000 · OtherSESPE CREEK BIBLE CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $81,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCROSSROADS COMMUNITY CHURCH OFSANTA CLARITA VALLEY: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherNEW LIFE IN HIS PRESENCE: $25,000 · OtherSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $25,000 · Other+7 more: $50,000 · Other+7 moreWORLD VISION INC: $55,000 · InternationalWORLD VISIO…Compassion International Incorporated: $45,000 · InternationalCompassion …FEED THE CHILDREN INC: $5,000 · InternationalSCV PREGNANCY CENTER: $95,000 · HealthSCV PREGNA…ZOE INTERNATIONAL: $40,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 · ReligionFRESH BEGINNINGS MINISTRIES: $10,000 · ReligionCITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $30,000 · Human ServicesOUR RESCUE: $20,000 · Arts & CultureFeeding America: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$666,000International$105,000Health$95,000Religion$75,000Human Services$30,000Arts & Culture$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetArrowhead Ranch Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetSCV PREGNANCY CENTER: $95,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZOE INTERNATIONAL: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $30,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH BEGINNINGS MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hope for Living Water Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hope for Living Water Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hope for Living Water’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home