Skip to content

· Public charity

Hooptee Charities Inc

Hooptee charities, inc.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$231kYouth Development$148kHuman Services$147kScience & Tech$15kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $8,800, the rows itemized in this filing. The $165,384 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $156,584 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$8,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$664k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JIMMIE JOHNSON FOUNDATION$8,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF GREENSBORO INC: $15k → 12%Black Child Development Institute: $30k → 16%Black Child Development Institute: $20k → 16%Black Child Development Institute: $15k → 16%YMCA of Greater Greensboro: $10k → 16%Carolina Family Connections: $7k → 10%Right Moves for Youth Inc: $20k → 10%Right Moves for Youth Inc: $20k → 10%Right Moves for Youth Inc: $20k → 10%Bright Blessings: $20k → 10%Bright Blessings: $20k → 10%ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$433k · 10 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$433k
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-14%

Still filing today

70%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Black Child Development Institute of Greensboro Inc
    4× · 2018–2022 · $80k · revenue +67%
  • RM
    Right Moves for Youth Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $60k · revenue +32%
  • BB
    BRIGHT BLESSINGS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $40k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • DP
    DISCOVERY PLACE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -22%
  • CI
    Communities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -62%
  • MS
    METRO SCHOOL PTO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Junior Achievement of Central Carolinas Inc

Junior achievement is the world's largest organization dedicated to educating private and public school students in grades k-12 about entrepreneurship, workforce readiness, and financial literacy, through experiential, hands-on programs.

International
2
Communities in Schools of North Carolina Inc

Cisnc's mission is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. cisnc serves as the backbone for its statewide network of 20 independent nonprofit organizations that serve local…

Human Services
3
Communities in Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc

The mission of Communities In Schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
4
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
5
North Carolina Business Leaders for Educ

The mission of north carolina business leaders for education (dba best nc) is to unite an engaged and informed business perspective to dramatically transform and improve north carolina's education system. our goal is for every student to…

Education
6
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
7
Carolina Collaborative Prep

Carolina collaborative prep (ccp) is a non-profit academic center that serves students in grades 3-12 with learning differences, empowering them to thrive in school and in life.

Education
8
Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Carolina

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
9
Carolina International School

Carolina international school ("cis") strives to develop caring and compassionate students and citizens who embody those character traits most respected in every culture. hence character development at cis is immersed in every interaction…

Education
10
Breakthrough Twin Cities

Breakthrough Twin Cities supports students on their journey to college by fostering a community of mutual learning with the next generation of educators so they both can collaborate, grow, and thrive.

Education
11
Carolina Charter Academy

Operation of a public charter school.

Education
12
Carolina Youth Symphony

Carolina Youth Symphony provides professional training to young students and gives these students the opportunity to perform several public concerts throughout the year.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carolina Youth Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Rise 2 Impact. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Black Child Development Institute of Greensboro Inc: $80,000 · Human ServicesBlack Child Development Institute of Gree…Right Moves for Youth Inc: $60,000 · Human ServicesRight Moves for Youth IncBRIGHT BLESSINGS: $40,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHT BLESSINGSALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $10,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesCAROLINA FAMILY CONNECTIONS: $7,125 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $50,100 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLSUMBA Bright Stars Inc: $30,000 · EducationUMBA Bright Stars IncCAROLINA YOUTH COALITION: $25,000 · EducationCAROLINA YOUTH COALITIONCommunities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc: $15,000 · EducationCommunities In Schools of Cha…BENNETT COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationBENNETT COLLEGEGUILFORD COLLEGE: $8,415 · EducationGUILFORD COLLEGECLASSROOM CENTRAL INC: $7,500 · EducationTHE SALVATION ARMY: $47,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS: $40,000 · OtherCHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG SCHO…Southeast High School: $30,000 · OtherSoutheast High SchoolMETRO SCHOOL PTO INC: $15,000 · OtherMETRO SCHOOL PTO INCYoung Black Leadership Alliance: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentRise 2 Impact: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentDISCOVERY PLACE INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureThe Childrens Theatre of Charlotte Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureKNOTHOLE FOUNDATION KNOTHOLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsJIMMIE JOHNSON FOUNDATION: $8,800 · Philanthropy
Human Services$207,125Education$146,015Other$132,500Youth Development$40,000Arts & Culture$25,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Philanthropy$8,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBlack Child Development Institute of Greensboro Inc: $80,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetRight Moves for Youth Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $50,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUMBA Bright Stars Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetYoung Black Leadership Alliance: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCAROLINA YOUTH COALITION: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDISCOVERY PLACE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunities In Schools of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKNOTHOLE FOUNDATION KNOTHOLE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENNETT COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRise 2 Impact: $10,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greensboro Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Childrens Theatre of Charlotte Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGUILFORD COLLEGE: $8,415 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLASSROOM CENTRAL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC26× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Albemarle Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Bill and Sharon Allen Family Foundation · Brighthouse Financial Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Servant Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hooptee Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hooptee Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hooptee Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hooptee Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hooptee Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph