· Private foundation
Honey Perkins Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC | $1,000 |
| WASHINGTON & LEE UNIVERSITY | $1,000 |
| LOST-N-FOUND YOUTH INC | $1,000 |
| READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC | $1,000 |
| ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC | $1,000 |
| CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA | $1,000 |
| EQUALITY FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INC | $1,000 |
| MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC | $1,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHARLESTON SOUT | $1,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL WOMENS HOUSE INC | $1,000 |
| LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC | $1,000 |
| CHESTERFIELD CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL | $600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 36 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
PRINCETON PRO MUSICA5× · 2019–2023 · $11k · revenue +69%- TGTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $10k · revenue +264%
WESTRICK MUSIC ACADEMY INC4× · 2019–2022 · $7k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- LFLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCone grant, 2020 · $1k
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +36%- GHGreater Huntsville Humane Society Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +107%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide post-secondary education of excellence.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Our mission is to shape the future of finance by developing leaders whose innovation, investment excellence, and human-centered leadership advance the industry and its adjacent sectors.
The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity in Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reading Is Fundamental Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PRINCETON PRO MUSICA ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds WESTRICK MUSIC ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHARLESTON SOUTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds Chesterfield Cultural Arts Foundation ↗
- Who funds READING IS FUNDAMENTAL INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds DECATUR ARTS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Shakespeare Company Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
- Who funds DeKalb Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds ARM IN ARM INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL DISC GOLF EXPERIENCE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC ↗
- Who funds HITOPS INC ↗
- Who funds PRINCETON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MERCER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BATTERED WOMENS SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds Rescue Mission of Trenton New Jersey ↗
- Who funds Capital Harmony Works Inc ↗
- Who funds SETI INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Decatur Book Festival ↗
- Who funds Community Farmers Markets Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSAL PLAY DISC GOLF ↗
- Who funds THE HOKIE WAY INC ↗
- Who funds ONE SIMPLE WISH INC ↗
- Who funds MCCARTER THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Curtis W McGraw Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Educational Ventures Inc · George H and Estelle M Sands Foundation · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Griffin-Cole Fund · Mary Owen Borden Memorial Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Mercer Inc · The Snyder Family Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Honey Perkins Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Womanspace Inc — 47% of income from government
- Princeton Pro Musica — 14% of income from government
- Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
- Rescue Mission of Trenton New Jersey — 8% of income from government
- Arts Council of Princeton — 6% of income from government
- Princeton Symphony Orchestra Inc — 4% of income from government
- Arm in Arm Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.