· Private foundation
Homer Vinson Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLACE OF GRACE | $7,500 |
| ENTRUSTED HOPE MINISTRIES | $7,400 |
| CRU | $3,500 |
| MONTANA MISSION | $3,000 |
| GLOBAL 504 | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATI | $2,500 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| BILLY GRAHAM EVANG ASSOC | $2,000 |
| EL ROI | $1,900 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| LIGHTHOUSE PRISON MINISTRIES | $1,500 |
| AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION | $1,500 |
| SLAVIC GOSPEL ASSOCIATION | $1,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 6% of Homer Vinson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.
41 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- EHENTRUSTED HOPE MINISTRIES5× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +74%
- BFBibles For The World8× · 2018–2025 · $18k · revenue +63%
GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC8× · 2018–2025 · $17k · revenue +54%
Funded once
- DTDallas Theological Seminaryone grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue +9%
- RCRESOURCING CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONone grant, 2022 · $2k
- AOASSOCIATION OF MISSIONSone grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations
This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.
Religious Purposes
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Chruch
Providing shelter for the homeless
How this is measured
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENTRUSTED HOPE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Bibles For The World ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE PLACE OF GRACE INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Global 504 ↗
- Who funds EIGHT DAYS OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA GROCERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Christ for the World Inc ↗
- Who funds HOME OF EL ROI ↗
- Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗
- Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
- Who funds BIBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Horizons · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Homer Vinson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Homer Vinson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Homer Vinson Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Homer Vinson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Homer Vinson’s filings →