Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Hollyjolly Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$292k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Animals$1.9MArts & Culture$1.0MHealth$868kEnvironment$511kEducation$425kHuman Services$310kRecreation & Sports$192kHousing & Shelter$155kOther$0
02FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $298k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+2 grants · $542k
$50,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LABELLE FOUNDATION INC$292,000
RESCUE LIFE$250,000
U MIAMI HOSPITAL - DR CORREA ONCOLOGY$150,008
DIABETES NETWORK OF ARIZONA$100,098
ADDICTION EDUCATION SOCIETY INC$100,002
Individual grant recipient$100,000
AMERICA'S VETDOGS$99,901
ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME$99,901
NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$75,286
NAMI$75,286
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA$75,286
FILLING IN THE BLANKS$75,286
STETSON UNIVERSITY$65,000
DOLPHIN RESEARCH CENTER$51,250
WEST POINT ASSOCIATION OF GRADUATES$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DIABETES NETWORK OF ARIZONA: $100k → 11%FAIRWINDS FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%SIERRA DELTA: $25k → 9%FILLING IN THE BLANKS: $75k → 9%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $50k → 12%ELIZABETH GREGORY HOME: $100k → 9%DOLLARS & GOOD SENSE FOUNDATION: $50k → 13%CHILDREN'S PLACE AT HOME SAFE: $50k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 20 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
28

Total granted

$3.8M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+8%

Still filing today

80%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $412k · revenue +77%
  • SU
    STETSON UNIVERSITY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $360k · revenue +7%
  • UF
    UTAH FILM CENTER
    2× · 2020–2023 · $213k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $180k · revenue -101%
  • TF
    THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +117%
  • GP
    GREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
4
Marine Megafauna Foundation

Save threatened marine life using pioneering research, education, and sustainable conservation solutions

International
5
Sea Research Foundation Inc

To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.

Animals
6
Reef Environmental Education Foundation

Reef environmental education foundation (reef) was established as a nonprofit organization in 1990. reef conserves marine environments worldwide. our mission is to protect biodiversity and ocean life by actively engaging and inspiring the…

Recreation & Sports
7
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
8
The Seattle Aquarium Society

Our mission is inspiring conservation of our marine environment.

Animals
9
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
10
The Marine Mammal Center

The marine mammal center advances global ocean conservation through marine mammal rescue and rehabilitation, scientific research, and education. the center's work is guided and inspired by a shared vision of a healthy ocean for marine…

Animals
11
The Ocean Foundation

As the only community foundation for the ocean, The Ocean Foundation's 501(c)(3) mission is to improve global ocean health, climate resilience, and the blue economy. We create partnerships to connect people in the communities in which we…

Environment
12
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the City of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringLocal History MuseumsSenior Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Equine Therapy ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/55
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,510

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/54
Grantees still filing
27/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Labelle Foundation Inc — $536,090 · AnimalsThe Labelle Foundation IncRESCUE LIFE INC — $475,000 · AnimalsRESCUE LIFE INCAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $190,095 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATIONDOLPHIN RESEARCH CENTER INC — $186,215 · AnimalsDOLPHIN RESEARCH CENTER INCNEW ENGLAND ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $180,035 · AnimalsNEW ENGLAND ANIMAL SANCTUARY INCGREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $100,000 · AnimalsDOLPHIN COMMUNICATION PROJECT INC — $70,000 · Animals+5 more — $145,000 · Animals+5 moreIndividual grant recipient — $410,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientU MIAMI HOSPITAL - DR CORREA ONCOLOGY — $150,008 · OtherU MIAMI HOSPITAL - DR CORREA ONCOL…Individual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC — $75,286 · OtherAMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC — $190,000 · OtherAMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION I…AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC — $99,901 · OtherSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue — $75,000 · Other+33 more — $871,307 · Other+33 moreTHEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC — $411,720 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE WORKSHOP …UTAH FILM CENTER — $212,577 · Arts & CultureUTAH FILM CENTERFriends Of Bafta Us Inc — $200,000 · Arts & CultureFriends Of Bafta …THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM COLLABOR…+3 more — $48,760 · Arts & CultureANCHOR HEALTH INITIATIVE CORP — $175,000 · HealthADDICTION EDUCATION SOCIETY INC — $100,002 · HealthNAMI National — $85,286 · HealthNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $75,286 · HealthTHE GIVE BACK COMMUNITY INC — $50,000 · HealthDIABETES NETWORK OF ARIZONA INC — $100,098 · Human ServicesElizabeth Home — $99,901 · Human ServicesFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC — $75,286 · Human ServicesDollars and Good Sense Foundation — $50,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesThe Children's Place at Home Safe Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesSIERRA DELTA INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesFAIRWINDS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC — $360,000 · EducationSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $15,000 · EducationOCEANA INC — $120,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC — $65,617 · EnvironmentSEAWORLD & BUSCH GARDENS CONSERVATION FUND — $45,000 · EnvironmentTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $25,000 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Environment
Animals$1,882,435Other$1,971,502Arts & Culture$973,057Health$485,574Human Services$475,285Education$375,000Environment$265,617

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Labelle Foundation Inc — $536,090 over 4y, 23% of budgetRESCUE LIFE INC — $475,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetTHEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC — $411,720 over 4y, 14% of budgetSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC — $360,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $212,577 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFriends Of Bafta Us Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $190,095 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC — $190,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetDOLPHIN RESEARCH CENTER INC — $186,215 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNEW ENGLAND ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $180,035 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetANCHOR HEALTH INITIATIVE CORP — $175,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetOCEANA INC — $120,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetADDICTION EDUCATION SOCIETY INC — $100,002 over 1y, 17% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC — $99,901 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetElizabeth Home — $99,901 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetNAMI National — $85,286 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $75,286 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC — $75,286 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFILLING IN THE BLANKS INC — $75,286 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue — $75,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetDOLPHIN COMMUNICATION PROJECT INC — $70,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetTHE CORAL RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC — $65,617 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetThe Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc — $60,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMELANOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GIVE BACK COMMUNITY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetCaptain Planet Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDollars and Good Sense Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 98% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Children's Place at Home Safe Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSEAWORLD & BUSCH GARDENS CONSERVATION FUND — $45,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE TARAS OCEANOGRAPHIC FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetLEADERS IN FURTHERING EDUCATION INC — $37,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAir Warrior Courage Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSIERRA DELTA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE CORAL REEF ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSEACOLOGY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCox Science Center and Aquarium Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAIRWINDS FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetNANTUCKET COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER — $20,010 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE PALM BEACHES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF PALM BEACH COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable F…Silicon Valley Commun…Morgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodAmerican Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Paypal Charitable Giv…Fidelity Investments …
The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY11.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hollyjolly Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Ywca of Palm Beach County — 72% of income from government
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Cox Science Center and Aquarium Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Community Music Center — 1% of income from government
  • Stetson University Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Dolphin Research Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines