Skip to content
Holland-Iribe Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Holland-Iribe Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$267k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.4MArts & Culture$56kHealth$44kHuman Services$30kFood & Nutrition$27kAnimals$14kEnvironment$9kInternational$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $225k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$890k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWEET BRIAR COLLEGE$225,000
HOUSE OF RUTH$5,000
GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION (WETA)$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC$3,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$3,000
ALIVE$3,000
THE NORTH CAROLINA PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATION INC (PBS NORTH CAROLINA)$3,000
MARTHA'S TABLE$3,000
VIRGINIA AQUARIUM AND MARINE SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION$3,000
HAMPTON ROADS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION (WHRO)$3,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF THE KING'S DAUGHTERS$3,000
NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL$3,000
CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK$3,000
UNICEF USA$2,000
KEY WEST WILDLIFE CENTER$1,030
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALIVE: $3k → 9%ALIVE: $3k → 9%ALIVE: $1k → 9%ALIVE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 22 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
26

Total granted

$1.6M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+36%

Still filing today

68%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +2%
  • MT
    MARTHA'S TABLE INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +41%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF RUTH
    5× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • NW
    NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +72%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • JF
    John F Kennedy Center
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.

Public Benefit
3
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
4
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
5
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
6
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
12
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Table Inc; the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
26/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $1,401,000 · EducationSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE+1 more: $1,000 · EducationNATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN SCHOOL INC: $32,000 · OtherNATIONAL …GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION (WETA): $7,000 · OtherHOUSE OF RUTH: $7,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherVIRGINIA AQUARIUM & MARINE SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · OtherJohn F Kennedy Center: $6,000 · OtherKennedy Center Circles: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · OtherHAMPTON ROADS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION (WHRO): $5,000 · OtherTHE NORTH CAROLINA PUBLIC TELEVISION FOUNDATION INC (PBS NORTH CAROLINA): $5,000 · OtherALIVE Inc: $8,000 · OtherALIVE IncUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $7,000 · Other+18 more: $25,200 · Other+18 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $14,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $13,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $250 · HealthMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $17,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $9,000 · Food & NutritionBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHAMPTON ROADS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $2,000 · Arts & CultureHOUSE OF RUTH: $16,000 · Housing & ShelterCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $7,500 · AnimalsKEY WEST WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $1,530 · Animals
Education$1,402,000Other$137,200Health$37,250Food & Nutrition$27,000Arts & Culture$23,500Housing & Shelter$18,000Animals$9,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSWEET BRIAR INSTITUTE: $1,401,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $16,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON DRAMA SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON DC INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALIVE Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTON ROADS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA AQUARIUM & MARINE SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetORANGUTAN FOUNDATION INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEY WEST WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $1,530 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST STEPHEN'S AND ST AGNES SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHESDA-CHEVY CHASE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOceana Volunteer Fire Department: $200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Give Lively Foundatio…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Greater Washington Co…Vanguard Charitable E…T Rowe Price Program …National Philanthropi…The Ayco Charitable F…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodRenaissance Charitabl…
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY15× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Holland-Iribe Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Holland-Iribe Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Holland-Iribe Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home